875
reputation
1
7
13

probabilityislogic

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?

5
answers
4
questions
~18k
people reached
  • Australia
  • Member for 9 years, 10 months
  • 103 profile views
  • Last seen Feb 25 '20 at 14:03

Top tags (16)

Score 4
Posts 3
Posts % 33
Score 2
Posts 1
Score 1
Posts 1
Score 1
Posts 1
Score 0
Posts 2
Score 0
Posts 1

Top posts (9)

Badges (21)

Gold

1

Rarest

Silver

7

Rarest

Bronze

13

Rarest