5
votes
Accepted
How can we correctly understand the definition stating that the union of conjugacy classes forms a normal subgroup?
Neither of your characterisations of normal subgroup are correct. You should re-read whatever sources you are using carefully.
A subgroup $H$ of $G$ is normal if and only if for all $h \in H$, for ...
- 10.3k
1
vote
$K \unlhd A \rightarrow \Phi(A)$ is isomorphism
There is 1-1 correspondence between $\{ A\leq G_1 : K\leq A\}$ and subgroups of $\pi (G_1) = G_1 / K$.
surjective: as $\pi$ is surjective, for every subgroups $C \leq G_1 / K$ exists $\pi ^ {-1} (C) \...
- 71
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
Related Tags
normal-subgroups × 2396group-theory × 2119
abstract-algebra × 1275
finite-groups × 401
sylow-theory × 166
quotient-group × 166
group-homomorphism × 148
group-isomorphism × 145
abelian-groups × 140
solution-verification × 134
symmetric-groups × 70
cyclic-groups × 63
direct-product × 60
group-actions × 55
simple-groups × 52
permutations × 48
solvable-groups × 44
dihedral-groups × 37
examples-counterexamples × 36
p-groups × 33
semidirect-product × 32
proof-explanation × 31
free-groups × 28
infinite-groups × 24
lie-groups × 23