New answers tagged

1 vote
Accepted

Proof of the completion of a normed space

Recall that elements of $\hat{X}$ are equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences in $X$, with the equivalence relation $[x] \sim [y]$ iff $x_n - y_n \to 0$, i.e $\lim_{n \to \infty}\|x_n - y_n\| = 0$. ...
Kakashi's user avatar
  • 361
1 vote

Do we have Arzela-Ascoli theorem on the space of all continuous stochastic process?

$X_k$ need not have a subsequence that converges in $U$. One way to generate a counterexample is to consider constant processes (i.e. processes such that $t \mapsto X_{k,t}(\omega)$ is constant for ...
Rhys Steele's user avatar
1 vote

Semigroup properties of spectral fractional Laplacian

Yes on all counts. The first question should be whether the spectral fractional Laplacian generates a semigroup at all. This is indeed the case. An explicit formula is $$ P_t f=\sum_{k=1}^\infty e^{-t\...
MaoWao's user avatar
  • 14.7k
1 vote
Accepted

When you extend a bounded, injective, and compact operator with dense image, is the extension also injective

Let $X = Y = \ell^2$, $c_c$ are the finite sequences and $$ V = \left\{x \in c_c \;\middle|\; x_1 = \sum_{n=2}^\infty x_n \right\}.$$ Further, $$ L x := (x_2/2, x_3/3, x_4/4, \ldots).$$ It is clear ...
gerw's user avatar
  • 29.8k
0 votes

If $(f_{n})_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ is bounded in $\mathcal{C}([0,1],\mathbb{R})$, then $(Sf_{n})_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ has a convergent subsequence

The result has to be true, because $S$ (the Volterra Operator) is compact. Here is an ad-hoc argument. For each $n\in\mathbb N$, consider the partition $X_n=\big\{[\frac{k-1}n,\frac kn)\big\}_{k=1}^n$ ...
Martin Argerami's user avatar
-2 votes

Sharp constant in the $L^p$ regularity estimate?

That is just an attempt, I tried using Fourier theory and the Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev theorem, but this does not work if $\alpha=2$ is equal to the dimension $d=2$, where $\alpha$ is the power ...
zeraoulia rafik's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Is there an inequality to compare the essential supremum of a function to the function itself?

Yes, it follows that $\text{ess sup} f \geq f(x)$ for almost every $x\in \Omega$. Indeed, if by contradiction this is false, then there exists a set $A$ of positive measure so that $f(x) > \text{...
Yanko's user avatar
  • 13.3k
-1 votes

How can I show $\|XMY\|=\|M\|$?

The only way I can prove it is using tensor notation. Start with the definition, $$ \|M\|^2 = {M^j}_i {{M^*}_j}^i = {M_j}^i {{M^*}^j}_i $$ since if $M = {M^j}_i$ then $M^H := {{M^*}_j}^i$ (in words, a ...
Ted Black's user avatar
  • 355
2 votes
Accepted

How can I show $\|XMY\|=\|M\|$?

I'm afraid your second step $\langle XMY, XMY\rangle=\langle X^HXM,MYY^H\rangle $ is not valid, since we can only do the conversion $X\to X^H$ from the left side, not the right side. The correct proof ...
Ricky's user avatar
  • 2,593
0 votes

Exponential Shift Operator with another differential Operator

If you Fourier transform by $y$, you will get $$e^{{1\over 2} y^TCy}\sim \det(C)^{-d\over2}\int e^{iqy}e^{{1\over2}q^{T}C^{-1}q}dq$$ and so $$e^{-t\nabla_x \nabla_y} e^{{1\over2} y^TCy}\sim\int dq e^{...
user619894's user avatar
  • 3,583
0 votes

Commutant of a set of operators and norm topology.

Note the weak topology is weaker than the strong topology which in turn is weaker than the norm topology. So saying the commutant is WOT closed implies it is closed in the other two (this is in ...
Dylan's user avatar
  • 21
0 votes

Hankel Operator is compact

Solution 1 By the Schur test, with $p_n=1,$ we have $\|A\|_{\ell^2\to \ell^2}\le \sum_{n=1}^\infty|a_n|.$ Let $A_N$ denote the truncated matrix, i.e. $$A_N(i,j)=\begin{cases} A(i,j) & i+j\le N\\ 0 ...
Ryszard Szwarc's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Using density to prove an inequality for functions $f \in H^{1}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$

First: Fatou’s lemma is the key. Whenever you have convergence in $L^2$, you have convergence a.e. (up to subsequences). And whenever you have a sequence of functions $\varphi_n$ that converge a.e. to ...
Lorenzo Pompili's user avatar
0 votes
Accepted

Ultra-weak topology on space of operators: conditions for convex set to be closed

Ok, I guess to close the question I should just copy down the guided exercise in Rudin's 'Functional Analysis' book, chapter 4, exercise 21. Here $X$ is a Banach space with its dual of continuous ...
Liron Atia's user avatar
  • 1,449
3 votes

Maximal domain of unbounded linear differential operator

To determine the domain $\mathcal{D}(\mathrm{T})$ and the range $\mathcal{R}(\mathrm{T})$ of the linear operator $\mathrm{T}$ defined as $\mathrm{T}f = v \cdot \partial_xf(x,v)$ on the weighted ...
zeraoulia rafik's user avatar
1 vote

Are nuclear operator between Banach spaces compact?

The $T_{m}$ that you have defined are finite rank operators, which are compact since they have finite dimensional range. Since you have showed that the the operator $T$ is a norm limit of finite rank ...
liamsi Meean's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Counterexample concerning Rudin's definition of open sets in $\mathscr D(\Omega)$

The simplest counterexample $\{0\}$ was given in comments. Since you asked meanwhile for "a convex balanced set $W⊂\mathcal D$ such that $\mathcal D_K∩W$ is open for some $K,$ but not all $K$&...
Anne Bauval's user avatar
  • 27.4k
0 votes
Accepted

Space of functions of infinitely many variables with norm different from the uniform one

Assuming each $\mu_t$ is a Radon probability (your seminorm $\|\cdot\|_p$ is ill-defined without some assumption on the total masses of the measures $\mu_t$), one can prove the existence and ...
P. P. Tuong's user avatar
0 votes

Is the derivative of differentiable function $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ measurable on $\mathbb{R}$?

I have read the only answer posted to this question, but I am afraid it is not right: Of course, if the derivative of $f$ at a point $x$ is greater than a real number $L$, there will be a natural ...
Emilio Mora's user avatar
4 votes
Accepted

Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for Bochner spaces

Holder’s inequality very generally states that for every measurable function $f,g:\Omega\to [0,\infty]$, we have for every $1\leq p\leq\infty$ that \begin{align} \int_{\Omega}fg\,d\mu\leq \|f\|_{p}\|g\...
peek-a-boo's user avatar
  • 49.7k
1 vote

Counterexample concerning Rudin's definition of open sets in $\mathscr D(\Omega)$

As noted by Anne in the comments, there are several easy counterexamples ($\{0\}$ being one of them). However, I think you are a little confused when it comes to the definition here. The definition ...
Vasily Melnikov's user avatar
1 vote

Is there a proof that continuous linear operators are bounded that uses this line of reasoning?

Firstly, unfortunately there is no such result about continuous images of unit spheres being bounded in infinite dimensions. In fact, a result of Bessaga shows that an infinite dimensional Hilbert ...
M W's user avatar
  • 4,002
1 vote
Accepted

Holder inequality for 3 functions

Indeed, you can recursively apply the Hölder inequality using associativity to get $$\|f^2g\|_{L^1(\Omega)}=\|f\cdot (fg)\|_{L^1(\Omega)}\leq \|f\|_{L^\infty(\Omega)}\cdot \|fg\|_{L^1(\Omega)}\leq \|f\...
b00n heT's user avatar
  • 15.8k
1 vote
Accepted

Question about proof that normal operators have invariant subspace

Perhaps it is more transparent to apply the spectral theory of self adjoint operators. Assume $T$ is a normal operator and is is not a multiple of the identity operator. We have $T=A+iB$ where $A={1\...
Ryszard Szwarc's user avatar
0 votes

Variational formulation-exercise

The expression you want to prove relates to the inner product between functions in the Sobolev spaces H^(-1)(Ω) and H^1(Ω). To prove this, you'll need to use the properties of Sobolev spaces and ...
joesaille's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Eigenfunctions of 1D gaussian kernel

Taking the Fourier transform of both sides of $$ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-(x-y)^2/\sigma^2}f(y)\,dy = \lambda f(x), \tag{1} $$ we obtain $$ \sqrt{\pi}\sigma e^{-\frac{1}{4}\sigma^2k^2}F(k)=\lambda F(...
Gonçalo's user avatar
  • 4,457
1 vote
Accepted

Continuous mean ergodic theorem

There are some assumptions missing in question (e.g. where f lives?, it is impossible to integrate a vector in an arbitrary Hilbert space), but this proof should work with these assumptions (if not ...
Yanko's user avatar
  • 13.3k
1 vote
Accepted

Proving $\|fg\|_{L^1} \leq \|f\|_{L^p}^{\alpha} \|g\|_{L^q}^{1-\alpha}$

Let $f$ and $g$ be any positive functions for which all the integrals here are finite. Replacing $f$ by $nf$ we see that we must have $1 \leq \alpha$. Replacing $g$ by $ng$ we see that $1 \leq 1-\...
geetha290krm's user avatar
  • 28.6k
1 vote

Finding the conjugate of an operator between the Banach spaces $\ell_{p}$

The key to these kind of questions is how the duality is implemented. When we say that $\ell_q$ is the dual of $\ell_p$, what we mean is that any continuous linear functional $f:\ell_p\to\mathbb C$ is ...
Martin Argerami's user avatar
0 votes

Why are coercive functions called coercive, and why is it useful?

I don't know if this can be helpful, but I'll provide an insight about the definition. As already pointed out, a function $f:\mathbb{R^n} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is usually said to be coercive "...
rod's user avatar
  • 643
3 votes

Why are coercive functions called coercive, and why is it useful?

$\bf{Definition}$: A function $f : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R^n}$ is coercive if and only if: $$\lim_{\| x \| \to + \infty} \frac{f(x) \cdot x}{\| x \|} \to + \infty,$$ In terminology, this is named a ...
ThunbergFan's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Uniqueness of Sturm-Liouville like problem

I doubt that uniqueness holds under these assumptions. Consider any function $f\in C^1(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})$ such that $f(\xi)=\pi^2\xi$ $(\xi \in [-1,1])$ and $f(\xi)=0$ $(|\xi| > 2)$. Clearly $...
Gerd's user avatar
  • 5,999
1 vote
Accepted

No nonzero continuous linear functional on $C([0,1])$ with this metric

As stated the assertion is trivially false because $V$ could be finite-dimensional, and the dual of a finite-dimensional TVS agrees with the algebraic dual and it has the same dimension as $V$. The ...
Martin Argerami's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Functional Analysis trying to show that hilbert space equals $\sum \mathbb{F} e_j$

This statement is false. As has already been commented we can consider the sequence $x_n=\sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{k}e_k$. Since the sequence is cauchy it has a limit $x$ and it is easy to see that $<x,...
spinosarus123's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

Doubt in a simple statement related to the maximal dyadic operator.

This is from the definition of supremum. The maximal function is the supremum of all averages $\frac1{|Q|}\int_Q |f(y)|dy$, so if the supremum is greater than $t$ there must exist a cube whose average ...
kieransquared's user avatar
0 votes

On a locally-compact group $h(x^{-1})$ constant a.e. $\implies h(x)$ constant a.e. (proof of uniqueness of Haar measure)

Knapp's argument shows that there is a $\lambda$-null set $N\subset G$ such that if $x_0\in N^c=G\backslash N$ and we set $h_{x_0}(g) := |h(g^{-1}x_0)-h(x_0)|$ then $\text{supp}(h_{x_0}) = L_{x_0}$ ...
krm2233's user avatar
  • 2,501
6 votes
Accepted

Are there any nonzero continuous multilinear functions $\ell^\infty(\mathbb{R})\to\mathbb{R}$?

No, even with just the second requirement. Assume $f(x) \neq 0$ for some $x$. Let $y^n = \left((1 + \frac 11)\cdot x_1, (1 + \frac 12)\cdot x_2, (1 + \frac 13)\cdot x_3, \ldots, (1 + \frac 1n)\cdot ...
mihaild's user avatar
  • 14.2k
2 votes
Accepted

Trying to compute norm of an operator

You cannot expect to compute the norm of an operator of the form $T(h,k)=Th+Sk$ without consideration of the particular form of $T$ and $S$. Consider $H_1=H_2=\mathbb C$, and $T=S=1$ and fix $h,k\in\...
Martin Argerami's user avatar
1 vote

Convergence in weak topology implies pointwise convergence for a subsequence

This is not true. The sequence $$ x_n := sign(\sin(n \pi t) $$ converges weakly in $L^p(0,1)$ to $x=0$. But $x_n\ne0$ almost everywhere.
daw's user avatar
  • 47.1k
1 vote

Does the "precise representative" $f^*$ uniquely represent classes in $L^1_{loc}$?

I tried to give myself an answer. However, the fastest way to see this is definitley, as it has been suggested in the comments, passing through Lebesgue-Besicovitch differentiation theorem, which ...
rod's user avatar
  • 643
1 vote

Showing operator norm over $\mathbb{R}$ attains supremum

Consider the following set $S$={$v\in V;||v||=1$}$=B_V[0,1]$ by riesz compactness theorem $S$ is copmact since V is of finite dimension . And then define the mapping $N:S\rightarrow\mathbb R^+$ by ...
Mahmoud Mrowi's user avatar
0 votes

Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the Fredholm integral equation of the second kind

Since $$ Ku(x)=\sin(x)\int_{0}^{\pi}\sin(y)u(y)\,dy + \alpha \cos(x)\int_{0}^{\pi}\cos(y)u(y)\,dy, \tag{1} $$ the eigenfunctions of $K$ associated with nonzero eigenvalues must be linear combinations ...
Gonçalo's user avatar
  • 4,457
3 votes
Accepted

Extension of equivalent norm in subspace to the whole space

In my opinion the equality $B_{XX}\cap Y=B_{YY}$ suffices and there is no need to study the closure of $B_{XX}.$ Indeed, for $y\in Y$ we have $$\|y\|_{YY}=\inf\{r>0\,:\, y\in rB_{YY}\}=\inf\{r>0\...
Ryszard Szwarc's user avatar
5 votes

Extension of equivalent norm in subspace to the whole space

[update: as I suspected this answer is more complicated than what you need (see Ryszard Szwarc‘s answer below for a simpler way to think about this), nonetheless here it is.] We must show that $\text{...
M W's user avatar
  • 4,002
2 votes
Accepted

Is the weak derivative a Radon-Nikodym derivative?

There is indeed a connection there, but your require a bit more regularity. You actually need $f\in W^{1,\infty}_{loc}(\mathbb{R})$, i.e. $f$ has to be locally Lipschitz. Then by Rademachers Theorem (...
humanStampedist's user avatar
0 votes

Fredholm Integral Equation of the Second Kind in $L_2[0,1]$

Let's first consider the simplest case: if $\lambda=0$, the solution to the integral equation $$ x(t) + \lambda \int_{0}^{1}\left(\frac{1}{2} - |t-s|\right)x(s)\, ds = \cos(\pi t) \tag{1} $$ is ...
Gonçalo's user avatar
  • 4,457
0 votes

Gelfand - Mazur theorem

If $a \in \mathcal{A}$ and $a \neq 0$ then $\sigma(a) = \left\{\lambda \in \mathbb{C} : \lambda e - a \text{ is not invertible}\right\}$ is non empty (due to another theorem). Observe also that $\...
user8469759's user avatar
  • 5,126
1 vote
Accepted

Is $a \mapsto(\pi(a) h \mid h)$ for $h \in \mathcal{H}$ with $\|h\|=1$ a state for non-unital C*algebra?

For the argument you are looking at, you don't really need to show that $$\tag1a\longmapsto\langle \pi(a)h,h\rangle$$ is a state; all that is needed is that it is a positive linear functional, because ...
Martin Argerami's user avatar
2 votes

Gelfand - Mazur theorem

An algebra $A$ in which the units (= invertible elements) are all non-zero elements of $A$ is called a division algebra. It is not true that any unital division algebra over $\mathbb C$ is isomorphic ...
krm2233's user avatar
  • 2,501
2 votes

Gelfand - Mazur theorem

The proof seems fine to me. The assumption is that all non-zero elements of $\mathcal{A}$ are invertible. So, $$a \neq 0 \implies \text{$a$ is invertible}. \tag{$\star$}$$ The contrapositive of this, ...
Theo Bendit's user avatar
  • 48.9k

Top 50 recent answers are included