# Questions tagged [formal-proofs]

For questions about proofs within a formal system, such as natural deduction or Hilbert system.

54 questions
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
823 views

### Prove $( \lnot C \implies \lnot B) \implies (B \implies C)$ without the Deduction Theorem

The issue is Exercise 1.47 (d) in Elliot Mendelson's "Mathematical Logic". The exercise is to prove $(\lnot C\implies\lnot B)\implies(B\implies C)$ by using the three axioms $(A1,A2,A3)$ without using ...
2k views

401 views

### Deducing $(\lnot B) \to A$ from $\lnot A \to B$ using Hilbert deductive system

As the title says, I've been trying to prove this: $(\lnot A \to B) \vdash (\lnot B) \to A)$ but unfortunately keep winding up with crazy long steps and then I have no idea where to go. The only ...
540 views

### Fitch proof for $(p \implies (q \implies r)) \implies ((p \implies q) \implies (p \implies r))$ with no premises

I'm having trouble solving this problem using the Fitch system. As I understand Fitch, if the goal has the form $(φ \implies ψ)$, it is often good to assume $φ$ and prove $ψ$ and then use Implication ...
561 views

### Fitch System For logic proofs

Does anyone know the Fitch program/ system used for logical proofs ? I am stuck with using fitch to construct a proof of¬(¬A∨¬B) from the premises A and B ... This is how it looks like in ...
2k views

### Proof of a theorem in Hilbert's system

I have been trying to prove that the propositional formula $\big( \alpha \rightarrow \lnot \beta \big) \rightarrow \big((\alpha \rightarrow \beta) \rightarrow \lnot \alpha \big)$ is a theorem in ...
1k views

### Natural deduction proof / Formal proof : Complicated conclusion with no premise

Find a formal proof for the following: $\vdash [(\neg p \land r)\rightarrow (q \lor s )]\longrightarrow[(r\rightarrow p)\lor(\neg s \rightarrow q)]$ As you can see. No premise to use. We have to use ...
220 views

### How to prove this sequent using natural deduction?

How do I prove $$S\rightarrow \exists xP(x) \vdash \exists x(S\rightarrow P(x))$$ using natural deduction? Just an alignment of which axioms or rules that one could use would be much appreciated.
476 views

### Formal deductions on Hilbert system

I have proved {(α→β),(β →γ)} ⊢ (α→γ) } using formal deductions using Modus Ponens and the three axiom of H2 : A1: A -> (B-> A) A2: (A-> (B->C)) -> ((A-> B) -> ( A -> C)) A3: (( ¬ A) -> ( ¬B)) -> ( ...
58 views

### Stuck on formal proofs. Not sure how to continue

I'm stuck on what how to continue. I know I'm missing a few steps but this is what I have so far. Thank you in advance! ¬Cube(b) → Small(b) Small(c) → (Small(d) ∨ Small(e)) Small(d) → ¬Small(c) Cube(...
2k views

### When writing proofs, is logical notation a crutch?

I'm near the end of Velleman's How to Prove It, self-studying and learning a lot about proofs. This book teaches you how to express ideas rigorously in logic notation, prove the theorem logically, and ...
3k views

### Use Fitch system to proof ((p ⇒ q) ⇒ p) ⇒ p without any premise. ONLY FOR FITCH SYSTEM.

I know here has few similar questions, but I cannot figure out with those answer. Since for Fitch system, I can only use And Intro, And Elim, Or Inro, Or Elim, Neg Intro, Neg Elim, Impl Intro, Impl ...
83 views

### Construct a deductive system where $1^n$ is provable iff $n$ is prime

I'd appreciate some help or at least a hint for the following exercise: Construct a (as simple as possible) deductive system where all sequences of the form $1^n$ (which means 111... $n$-times) is ...
372 views

### $A⇒(B \lor C)$ and $[(A \Rightarrow B) \lor (A \Rightarrow C)]$

[(A⇒ B∨C)] ⇒ [A⇒(¬B⇒C)] ⇒[(A⇒¬B)⇒(A⇒C)] ⇒ [¬(A⇒¬B)∨(A⇒C)]⇒[(A∧B)∨(A⇒C)] [(A⇒B)∨(A⇒C)] is equivalent to A⇒(B∨C). Can I prove [(A∧B)∨(A⇒C)] ⇒ [A⇒(B V C)]? or is there problem in the proof above ...
84 views

405 views

81 views

### How do we formally define “j-th smallest element”?

Let $A$ be a nonempty finite subset of $\mathbb{R}$. Firstly, let me write down how to define the term "the smallest element of $A$" formally. Suppose 'for every $x\in A$, there exists $y \in A$ ...
64 views

34 views

241 views

### Inductive proof using Fitch software

I am trying to prove the integer square root theorem $\forall x: \mathbb{N}, \exists y : \mathbb{N}((y^2 \leq x) \land (x < (y+1)^2))$ for $\lfloor \sqrt{x} \rfloor$. In words: for any natural ...
123 views

### (P → Q) v (Q → R), Fitch-style proof

I'm trying to construct a Fitch-style proof for $(P \to Q) \lor (Q \to R)$ using reductio ad absurdum and the introduction and elimination rules for conjunction, disjunction, and implication. I'm not ...
304 views

### How to show that $[(p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow r] \Rightarrow [p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r)]$

To show that $[(p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow r] \Rightarrow [p \rightarrow (q \rightarrow r)]$ without using a truth table. That is, using logical laws.
76 views

### Prove: $\forall n\in\mathbb{N}(3|n^2\Rightarrow 3|n)$

guys. I just started to learn infinitesimal mathematics 1 (I think it's analagous to calculus A - the professor said that it's the most theoretical course on calculus offered in the university (The ...