Skip to main content

Questions tagged [forcing]

Forcing is a set theoretic method used mainly for proving independence results. For questions about forcing function please use (differential-equations).

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
0 answers
18 views

"Correct" definition of $\kappa$-closed poset

Compare the following two definitions: (1) a poset is $\kappa$-closed if any decreasing sequence of length $<\kappa$ has a lower bound; (2) a poset is $\kappa$-closed if any decreasing sequence of ...
new account's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
24 views

How to force the unboundedness number to be uncountable?

Using Cohen forcing to add Cohen reals $c_\alpha$, $\alpha < \omega_1$, one can show that these form an unbounded family of said cardinality in the generic extension. As $\mathfrak{b} = \min \{ |\...
Nibbler's user avatar
  • 59
-1 votes
0 answers
70 views

Reading Intuitionistic Logic: Model Theory and Forcing in order to learn forcing [closed]

I'm trying to learn the intuitionistic approach to forcing by reading Intuitionistic Logic: Model Theory and Forcing by Melvin Fitting. I don't particularly care about the various theorems concerning ...
zaq's user avatar
  • 984
1 vote
2 answers
87 views

$\mathbb{P}$-names for powersets in forcing extension

So, I am trying to understand how to solve the following: Take the usual setup for forcing: a poset $\mathbb{P}$ lying in a countable transitive model $\mathcal{M}$. Give an explicit description of $\...
Ben123's user avatar
  • 1,551
0 votes
0 answers
56 views

If ($\mathbb{P} \ \text{is c.c.c.})^M$ then $\mathbb{P}$ preserves cardinals.

In "Old Kunen", we have that a partial order $\mathbb{P}$ preserves cardinals $$\iff \forall \beta \in o(M)[\beta > \omega \land (\beta \ \text{is a cardinal})^M \to (\beta \ \text{is a ...
Ben123's user avatar
  • 1,551
5 votes
1 answer
64 views

Choice of bound in the Laver property

$\newcommand{\P}{\mathbb{P}}$ Recall the following formulation of the Laver property (Page 459, Combinatorial Set Theory: With a Gentle Introduction to Forcing (Second Edition) by Halbeisen): Laver ...
Clement Yung's user avatar
  • 8,439
1 vote
1 answer
53 views

Kunen recursive definition of $\Vdash^*$ in the $\exists$-case.

Stupid question: In Kunens "Set Theory An Introduction to Independence Proofs", VII, $\S3$, definition 3.3,(e), we are given the following: $$p \Vdash^* \exists x\ \phi(x,\tau_1,\ldots,\...
Ben123's user avatar
  • 1,551
0 votes
0 answers
83 views

Exercise IV 2.8 in "New Kunen" (Set Theory).

So, I am learning about the most basic setup to get forcing on the ground, and I feel like I want to understand the recursively defined notion \begin{align*} \text{val}(\tau,G) &:= \{\text{val}(\...
Ben123's user avatar
  • 1,551
3 votes
0 answers
67 views

Is there a structure or abstraction that genuinely generalizes both field extensions and (Cohen) forcing?

I'm just starting with the topic so I don't know much. But I'm always told that the similarity with field extensions is just an analogy and we shouldn't take it so seriously. However, I just must ask ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,449
1 vote
1 answer
56 views

Consistency Strength of OCA?

I was wondering whether we know the consistency strength of the Open Colouring Axiom (or Todorčević's Axiom). It is a consequence of PFA, so clearly it is below a supercompact, but I cannot find ...
alvoi's user avatar
  • 993
0 votes
0 answers
62 views

What exactly are characteristic functions of sets when constructing Boolean models?

Reading J. L. Bell's Set Theory --- Boolean-Valued Models and Independence Proofs. This is how the introduction of Boolean models is motivated: Suppose that for each set $x ∈ V$ we are given a ...
zaq's user avatar
  • 984
2 votes
1 answer
122 views

In what sense is forcing "impossible" in $L$?

I just saw an interesting video from Hugh Woodin about Ultimate $L$. In it, he says one of the reasons $L$ is so interesting is because it not only settles many natural set theory questions, but is ...
Mike Battaglia's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
126 views

Intuition for working with p-names.

So I have been trying to learn about forcing in set theory from kunen. There are these things called "p-names" which have a complicated definition in forcing. if $M$ is a countable ...
Kripke Platek's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
46 views

What is meant by this association of the universe $V$ and the set of all formulas $\mathcal{L}^{(B)}$?

Reading J. L. Bell's Set Theory --- Boolean-Valued Models and Independence Proofs. The author introduces the class $V^{(B)}$, defined by $$x \in V^{(B)} \iff \mathrm{Fun}(x) \land \mathrm{ran}(x) \...
zaq's user avatar
  • 984
4 votes
1 answer
117 views

Introduction to Proper forcing

I’m trying to understand how proper forcing was introduced and the feeling of the model theoretic equivalence Could you please recommend a great introductory text? I have read the Jech’s Multiple ...
Selena's user avatar
  • 113
0 votes
1 answer
128 views

Can we sheaf-theoretically force a violation of the continuum hypothesis in a (nice) topos which is *bicomplete*?

$\newcommand{\p}{\mathcal{P}}$I recently dug through the exercises and details in Mac Lane and Moerdijk's book "Sheaves in Geometry and Logic" which concern themselves with (a baby version ...
FShrike's user avatar
  • 43.8k
0 votes
1 answer
111 views

Cohen proof that : Forcing has to be done using ordinals within countable models

In Cohen "Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis" on page 110 says : Our last theorem shows we must consider countable models. And then goes on to say : M is a fixed countable model of ZF ...
Confusdius's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
144 views

Which forcing technique implies "every set is countable from some perspective"? Which notion of "the same set" is used between models?

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paradox-skolem/ contains this claim: Further, the multiverse conception leads naturally to the kinds of conclusions traditional Skolemites tended to favor. Let $a$ ...
truth_enjoyer's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
221 views

Infinite Set of Naturals in Forcing Extension

Just a random doubt that came up while talking to a friend. Assume we have some forcing $\mathbb P$ that behaves pretty nicely, so for example we can assume it doesn't collapse $\omega_1$, it doesn't ...
alvoi's user avatar
  • 993
0 votes
2 answers
110 views

Why is $[[x \in y]]$ not $y(x)$ in Boolean-valued models?

I'm reading about Boolean-valued models (in order to understand the first Cohen model), and it seems as though the truth value of the formula "$x \in y$", which is written $[[x \in y]]$, is ...
Cloudscape's user avatar
  • 5,146
1 vote
1 answer
58 views

What is the cardinality of $\operatorname{Add}(\lambda, \kappa)$ for $\kappa < \lambda$?

I am reading the proof of the theorem 6.17 (in the chapter VII page 215) of the Kunen's Book (the old edition), that says: Theorem 6.17: In $M$, assume that $\lambda < \kappa$, $\lambda$ is ...
NON's user avatar
  • 117
1 vote
1 answer
47 views

Why is the union of working parts in the Hechler forcing a well-defined function?

Source: Set Theory, Third Edition by Thomas Jech. Definition (Hechler Forcing): Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a given family of functions $h: \omega\to\omega$. A forcing condition is a pair $p=(s, E)$, where $...
Dick Grayson's user avatar
  • 1,467
1 vote
0 answers
51 views

Kanamori, The Higher Infinite: Levy collapse, Propositions 10.20 and 10.21

I have a question regarding Kanamori's book The Higher Infinite, propositions 10.20 and 10.21. Proposition 10.20 states: Let $\mathbf{P} = (P, \leq)$ be a separative forcing notion with $\lvert P \...
C_M's user avatar
  • 57
1 vote
0 answers
63 views

Does a set of ground models and forcing extensions of a c.t.m. can make a tree (set theory)?

I think the set of all such models become a partially ordered set. For instance, I define $M_1 \leq M_2$ as $M_2$ is a forcing extension of $M_1$ or reversibly, $M_1$ is a ground model of $M_2$. Then, ...
beginner_nt's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
191 views

If GCH is wrong in ZFC...

I am currently working on a presentation about the Symmetric Group $Sym(X):= \{ \sigma : X \to X \mid \sigma \text{ is bijective} \}$ of a set $X \neq \emptyset$. I was able to show that for any ...
Timon Kolt's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
82 views

Real degrees after forcing a random real

We know a lot about the properties of the real degrees if we assume the existence of an $L$-generic Cohen real (e.g. see Abraham and Shore Degrees of Constructibility of Cohen Reals). Among other ...
Lorenzo's user avatar
  • 2,331
1 vote
1 answer
74 views

Mapping Reflection Principle

I'm reading this paper written by Moore and he mentions the notion of a continuous $\in-$chain. Can anyone tell me what he means by that? I can't find the definition The link for the original paper ...
Selena's user avatar
  • 113
2 votes
0 answers
54 views

Definition of a Partial Order (In: Kanamori, The Higher Infinite)

I have a question regarding a definition in Kanamori's book on page 136. (it's the beginning of the subsection about Random Reals) Let $\mathcal{B}^{\star} = \{X \in \mathcal{B} \ \lvert \ X \ \text{...
C_M's user avatar
  • 57
13 votes
2 answers
829 views

Infinite wacky race

Dick Dastardly is taking part in an infinite wacky race. What is infinite about it, you ask? Well, just everything! There are infinitely many racers, every one of which can run infinitely fast and the ...
Alma Arjuna's user avatar
  • 3,933
0 votes
1 answer
111 views

Is my intuition here regarding generic sets used in forcing correct?

In Jech's Chapter 14, p. 218 (2nd edition), the proof for the generic model theorem (i.e. Theorem 14.5) begins with: "Let $(P, <) $ be a notion of forcing in the ground model $M$, and let $G \...
Link L's user avatar
  • 645
1 vote
0 answers
129 views

Forcing as a Quotient

I'm reading Jech and following his Boolean algebra models approach to it. I'm wondering if I've got the right idea here. Let $M \models \mathrm{ZFC}$ and $B \in \mathbf{CompBoolAlg}$. We construct $M^...
ASheard's user avatar
  • 53
0 votes
1 answer
92 views

What are generic ideals and dense sets, intuitively?

Someone commented under one of my previous posts that, intuitively, a generic set isn't supposed to have any "conspicuous properties". I wonder what the precise meaning of that comment was ...
zaq's user avatar
  • 984
1 vote
1 answer
95 views

Theorem of Shelah about the existence of an inaccessible cardinal

There is a theorem of Shelah, stated in the following way: If all $\Sigma_3^1$ sets of reals are measurable, then $\aleph_1$ is an inaccessible cardinal in $L$. In some textbooks (for example ...
C_M's user avatar
  • 57
4 votes
0 answers
99 views

Forcing with the generic multiverse

Fix a countable transitive model $M$ and consider the collection $\mathbb{P}$ of all forcing extensions of $M$ (i.e., the generic multiverse of $M$), ordered by reverse containment. What happens if we ...
Lxm's user avatar
  • 1,008
3 votes
1 answer
136 views

Symmetric submodels of $M[G]$ are exactly the classes $(HOD(M[x]))^{M[G]}$

I'm trying to understand Grigorieff's proof (Theorem 3, page 478, Intermediate Submodels and Generic Extensions in Set Theory) that symmetric submodels of $M[G]$ are exactly $(HOD(M[x]))^{M[G]}$ for $...
JLB's user avatar
  • 312
2 votes
1 answer
113 views

Questions about Namba forcing

I am looking at Jech's proof of properties of Namba forcing. The conditions consist of perfect subtrees of $\omega_2^{<\omega}$, where perfect means every node has $\omega_2$ many (not necessarily ...
new account's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
97 views

Where does the term 'dense' used in forcing/Martin's axiom come from?

There are some common meanings to 'dense' in Mathematics. In Topology, a subset $S\subseteq X$ of a topological space $(X, \tau)$ is dense if the intersection of every non-empty open set with $S$ is ...
Chad K's user avatar
  • 4,993
3 votes
1 answer
158 views

BPI in Cohen Model

I'm reading Miroslav Repicky's paper "A proof of the independence of the Axiom of Choice from the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem" and I'm confused by the claim that an ideal $I$ on a Boolean ...
blark's user avatar
  • 682
0 votes
1 answer
49 views

κ-chain-condition in Levy collapse

I'm studying the Levy collapse: For S ⊆ On and λ regular, Col(λ, S) is defined in the following way: Col(λ, S) = {p | p is a function ∧ |p| < λ ∧ dom(p) ⊆ S × λ ∧ ∀ <α, ξ > ∈ dom(p)(p(α, ξ ) =...
C_M's user avatar
  • 57
3 votes
2 answers
167 views

Explicit construction of the transitive closure in the Boolean valued model

Suppose $t\in M^B$ is an element of the Boolean valued model. Since $ZF\vdash\exists$x x=TC({$Val_G(t)$}), there is $s\in M^B$ such that $1\Vdash Val_G(s)$=TC({$Val_G(t)$}). Is it possible to ...
JLB's user avatar
  • 312
0 votes
1 answer
128 views

Confused by Definition 14.25 in Jech regarding generic ultrafilters

In Definition 14.25 of Jech's set theory, the canonical name $\dot{G}$ for a generic ultrafilter is the Boolean function defined by: $$ \text{dom}(\dot{G})=\{\check{u} : u \in B \} $$ such that: $$ \...
Link L's user avatar
  • 645
7 votes
3 answers
434 views

Motivation behind Generic filters in forcing.

So I was reading about forcing in wikipedia to try to get an intuitive idea about forcing in set theory. There is this paragraph in it: A subtle point of forcing is that, if $X$ is taken to be an ...
Kripke Platek's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
68 views

How to understand canonical ultrafilter in forcing chapter of Jech

Am new to forcing (obviously...), and I got to read Definition 14.25 in Jech's Set Theory which defines the canonical ultrafilter $\dot{G}$ on the Boolean algebra $B$ which is: $\dot{G}(\check{u})=u$ ...
Link L's user avatar
  • 645
1 vote
1 answer
55 views

A step in Kunen's proof of ccc preserving cofinalities

I have a question about one of the steps in the proof of "$ccc$ preserves cofinalities" in Kunen. The whole proof is below. My question concerns the claim that $\sup Y=\beta$. I am not sure ...
J.R.'s user avatar
  • 481
4 votes
1 answer
169 views

How exactly does $G$ not being generic make $\mathbf{M}[G]$ not a model?

I've been trying to solve this exercise from Nik Weaver's Forcing for Mathematicians. Let $P$ be the set of all finite partial functions from $\mathbb{N}^2$ into $\{0,1\}$, let $α$ be a countable ...
zaq's user avatar
  • 984
0 votes
0 answers
86 views

Name for this Set

In Set Theory p. 209 - Jech (2003), the Jech performs the following construction: Let $ B \in \mathbf{BoolAlg} $. For $ \alpha \in \mathbf{Ord} $ and $ \lambda \in \mathbf{Lim} $, let $ V_0 = \...
ASheard's user avatar
  • 53
3 votes
1 answer
95 views

Permutation model in which infinite sets are Dedekind-infinite

I've been looking for a permutation model in which $IDI$ (every infinite set is Dedekind-infinite) and $\neg AC$ holds. I have found several (for example in Countable Sums and Products of Metrizable ...
JLB's user avatar
  • 312
4 votes
1 answer
122 views

Is this exercise on forcing trivial?

I'm reading Nik Weaver's Forcing for Mathematicians. This is one of the exercises. Let $P$ be a forcing notion, let $G$ be a generic ideal of $P$, and suppose $G \in \mathbf{M}$. (As we noted at the ...
zaq's user avatar
  • 984
2 votes
0 answers
52 views

Finite/Countable support iteration of countable cofinality and mad families

Using a finite support iteration $\langle P_\alpha, \dot{Q}_\alpha : \alpha < \kappa\rangle$ it has been shown that if $\kappa$ has uncountable cofinality, then using Mathias forcing one obtains a ...
JtSpKg's user avatar
  • 415
4 votes
0 answers
89 views

Is every ccc Baire forcing a Suslin tree?

Exercise IV.6.11 of Kunen says there exists an atomless ccc Baire poset iff there is a Suslin tree; I think here Baire can be taken to mean either countable intersection of dense open sets is dense or ...
Lxm's user avatar
  • 1,008

1
2 3 4 5
16