As of May 31, 2023, we have updated our Code of Conduct.

Questions tagged [constructive-mathematics]

The term "constructive mathematics" refers to the discipline in mathematics in which one proves the existence of mathematical objects only by presenting a construction that provides such an object. Indirect proofs involving proof by contradiction and law of excluded middle are considered nonconstructive. Constructivism is the philosophical stance that the only "true" mathematics is constructive mathematics.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
6 votes
2 answers
117 views

Proving the Existence of a Number without Constructing

Prove that for all $k \in \mathbb{N}$ then there exists $n$ such that $$ 7^k \mid 2^n + 5^n + 3 $$ My idea is to construct $n$ such that the equation above is valid. However, the construction that I ...
FaranAiki's user avatar
  • 266
0 votes
0 answers
28 views

Defining function "constructability"

I have a question regarding the idea of a "constructible" function, in the sense that I can write down an expression for it. For example, a bijection between $\mathbb{R}$ and its Hamel basis ...
sam wolfe's user avatar
  • 3,023
1 vote
2 answers
134 views

How to solve $(x-1)(x-2)=0$ constructively?

I want to prove that $$(x-1)(x-2)=0\Leftrightarrow x=1, 2$$ $\Leftarrow$ is easy. The problem is $\Rightarrow$. Assuming $x\neq 1, 2$, we can derive $1=0$ by dividing both sides of $(x-1)(x-2)=0$ by $...
BonBon's user avatar
  • 186
-1 votes
0 answers
31 views

What kind of partition of N over a computable function would describe the construct I'm posting?

I was wondering whether a pattern for Collatz conjecture be found within a partition based on a computable function. I constructed the S6 set as follows: The first member would be (0 x 2) + (2^0 x 21)...
Knight Who Says Ni's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
79 views

The points M and N and the circle k are given. Construct an equilateral triangle ABC inscribed in circle k such that |AM|=|BN|.

I chose an arbitrary length r and constructed two circles with centers in M ​​and N of radius r and marked their intersections with the given circle. Then I looked at the angle formed by the center of ...
kaykay's user avatar
  • 99
1 vote
1 answer
89 views

Countable set in constructive mathematics

Let $A$ be an alphabet (i.e. a set of symbols) and suppose that $A$ is countable. Let $X$ be the set of all the words (i.e. finite strings) that I can write using the alphabet $A$. Can I prove in ...
effezeta's user avatar
  • 275
4 votes
1 answer
231 views

What is considered proof? Wondering about the construction of the reals via Dedekind cuts, and how they can be said to exist.

BIG EDIT: I decided to re-write this question completely as it was first posted with a lot of misunderstandings on my part and unclear statements. Trying to edit it - with feedback from the lovely ...
Isa_Degn's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
320 views

Is intuitionist logic two-valued?

On this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_bivalence : Intuitionistic logic is a two-valued logic but the law of excluded middle does not hold. On this page https://en.wikipedia.org/...
Fnifni's user avatar
  • 111
0 votes
1 answer
32 views

About double negation and dependent function in Agda

data ⊥ : Set where f : {A : Set} → {B : A → Set} → ((a : A) → ((B a) → ⊥) → ⊥) → (((a : A) → B a) → ⊥) → ⊥ f = {! !} Type of the function f means: If "If ...
Komoe's user avatar
  • 13
1 vote
0 answers
62 views

Errett Bishop's formulation of Diaconescu's theorem

The Wikipedia article on Diaconescu's theorem states that Already in 1967, Errett Bishop posed the theorem as an exercise (Problem 2 on page 58 in Foundations of constructive analysis). The exercise ...
simple jack's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
111 views

Real numbers cannot be constructed?

Sorry if this is another crank finitism question, I am bit confused. According to wikipedia: Constructivism asserts that it is necessary to find (or "construct") a specific example of a ...
confusedscreaming's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
74 views

Is there a non-constructive proof-functional logic

I understand that classical logic preserves truth, is bivalent, and contains non-constructive proofs. In contrast, intuitionistic logic preserves justification/verification for a proof, is not ...
PW_246's user avatar
  • 606
0 votes
1 answer
161 views

Does the Axiom of Constructibility make Pasch's Axiom unnecessary?

I conjecture that we can weaken or replace Pasch's axiom while still admitting the n-dimensional Cartesian spaces over Euclidean ordered fields. Am I correct? Tarski's axioms include the Continuity ...
SRobertJames's user avatar
  • 2,317
2 votes
1 answer
81 views

Constructive proof of compactness theorem for countable propositional languages

Let $\mathcal{L}$ be a countable propositional language and let $\Gamma$ be a set of propositions of $\mathcal{L}$ (i.e. $\Gamma \subseteq \text{Prop}(\mathcal{L})$). Definition: $\Gamma$ is ...
effezeta's user avatar
  • 275
2 votes
1 answer
147 views

Is there a sheaf model where the Weak Markov's principle fails?

We define a real number $x$ to be pseudopositive if $\forall y \in \mathbb{R}$ we have $ \neg \neg (x > y) \vee \neg \neg (y > 0) $. The Weak Markov's Principle (WMP) is the axiom that every ...
saolof's user avatar
  • 609
2 votes
1 answer
216 views

Having hard times to understand the double negation translation implications. Is constructive logic at least as strong as classical, after all?

I do understand that constructive logic forbids the "lemma of excluded middle" for various reasons (let's not discuss these now). I do understand that lots & lots of classical theorems ...
Zazaeil's user avatar
  • 1,426
3 votes
1 answer
50 views

Books about constructivist approach for proof

I'm interested about the constructivist approach to math, and how the proof works in thoose framework. What are good introductory books I can read? I'm interested in online sources
Daniel Muñoz's user avatar
11 votes
3 answers
406 views

Two vertices of a triangle being fixed, find the locus of the third vertex such that the triangle has its circumcenter inside the incircle

Recently I played a little bit around with GeoGebra and I constructed the in- and circumcircle of a $\triangle ABC$ with $A=(0,0)$ and $B=(1,0)$ and I asked myself if it is possible to construct the ...
calculatormathematical's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
132 views

Are constructivists in favor of the Property of Baire?

Since the Axiom of Choice proves the law of excluded middle, constructivists reject it. Does this mean that constructivists are in favor of the negation of Choice? I take this further: Perhaps ...
Dannyu NDos's user avatar
  • 1,619
0 votes
0 answers
94 views

Proving axiom consistency

I am trying to prove that some preconditions don't introduce an inconsistency to my (constructive) system. I would like to know if this is possible with the set-up below, and how to do this, and what ...
Polina's user avatar
  • 1
0 votes
0 answers
64 views

What methods/objects in ZFC can't be computed and why not?

I was reading the Wikipedia page for set theory and read the following passage: "The most common objection to set theory, one Kronecker voiced in set theory's earliest years, starts from the ...
Joa's user avatar
  • 321
2 votes
0 answers
114 views

Does "Every set of $\mathbb{R}$ is Lebesgue measurable" imply some weakened LEM?

I would like to know if the Reverse Mathematics has a conclusion for this axiom ($\text{LM}$:Every set of $\mathbb{R}$ is Lebesgue measurable). I have tried to translate this axiom into a halting ...
Ember Edison's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
95 views

LLPO implies $x\leq0$ or $x\geq0$ in $\mathbb R$ [closed]

LLPO:If $a^{n}$ is a binary sequence containing at most one $1$, then either $a^{2n}=0$ for each $n$, or else $a^{2n+1}=0$ for each $n$. Prove LLPO implies $x\le 0$ or $x\ge 0$ in $\mathbb R$.
Yosuke Amano's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
106 views

Prove the existence of $f$ and why the function $f_n$ is constructed

I'm not an experienced person in proof. This is a proposition in Amann/Escher's Analysis. Let $X$ be a nonempty set and $\mathcal{a}\in X$. For each $n \in\mathbb{N}^{\times}$, let $V_{n}:X^{n} \to X$ ...
cycle motor's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
129 views

Why do most constructivists accept the axiom of countable choice? [closed]

One obvious reason is that it is useful. But is there a philosophical justification for it? This axiom does not seem of constructive flavour to me since there is no clear way to construct a choice ...
Subscribe for more Minecraft's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
84 views

Why does Brouwer choose time as the only *a priori* concept in intuitionism, and how the numbers are constructed under such interpretation

I recently read some materials about intuitionism in the philosophy of mathematics, such as Intuitionism and Formalism by Brouwer himself, and some relative interpretations, I maybe understand how he ...
Dylech30th's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
37 views

Constructive proof that analytic function equals zero

Let $h : V \to \mathbb{R}$ be an analytic function where $V \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ is open. This means by definition that for all $c$ in the domain of $h$, there is some neighbourhood $U \subseteq V$ ...
Mark Saving's user avatar
  • 29.8k
2 votes
0 answers
57 views

Does the inverse image part of a geometric morphism preserve "transitive set objects"?

Background Definitions Recall that a functor $F : A \to B$, where $A$ and $B$ are toposes, is said to be the inverse part of a geometric morphism when $F$ preserves finite limits and has a right ...
Mark Saving's user avatar
  • 29.8k
1 vote
1 answer
76 views

Constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory is contained in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory

I'm searching for a book or an article that proves that if a statement can be proved in Constructive Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory then the statement can be proved in Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (for ...
effezeta's user avatar
  • 275
0 votes
1 answer
113 views

Does the LNC imply the LEM?

If we do not assume the Law of Excluded Middle, we do not assume that there is no proposition $P$ for which it is false. However, if there were such a proposition, it would violate the Law of Non-...
user110391's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
133 views

What are proofs in constructivist logic?

The difference in syntax between classical and constructivist mathematics is, as far as I've understood, not because constructivists think a well-formed proposition may be untrue and unfalse at the ...
user110391's user avatar
0 votes
3 answers
117 views

Constructive proof that limits preserve inequalities

Suppose that $a_n \leq b_n$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$, where $a_n$ and $b_n$ are two convergent sequences. Is there a constructive proof that $\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n \leq \lim_{n \to \infty} b_n$? ...
ಠ_ಠ's user avatar
  • 10.3k
7 votes
1 answer
298 views

Axiom of Choice in Constructive Mathematics. Is it really an axiom?

The status of the Axiom of Choice varies between different branches of Constructive Mathematics. For example, in Constructive Set Theory the Axiom of Choice is not accepted because it implies the law ...
effezeta's user avatar
  • 275
0 votes
0 answers
31 views

Can we see association of sequencing of words in linguistic expression and the corresponding mathematical concept?

Consider a mathematical concept: "discrete random variable", here as par part of speech variable (being a noun) is coming first and the random (being an adjective) is coming just after the ...
Lakshman's user avatar
-3 votes
1 answer
163 views

Why do intuitionists think that proving $\neg \neg P$ merely constitutes a proof of the inexistence of a proof for $\neg P$?

In every case of $\neg \neg P$ that I've come across, the statement $\neg P$ has been disproven. Never has such a proof merely been proof for the inexistence of a proof for $\neg P$. Take the ...
user110391's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
205 views

Is there a constructive proof of Brouwer's fixed-point theorem that does not rely on triangulation?

I'm aware of the constructive proof of Brouwer's fixed-point theorem via Sperner's Lemma, and I love it for its simplicity, directness, and constructiveness. However, I still have a lingering ...
user3716267's user avatar
  • 1,125
0 votes
1 answer
58 views

Proving that the map $f:\mathbb R \to \text{Seq}(\mathbb Q)/\sim$ is surjective

I was reading about constructing Real numbers using Cauchy sequences of rational numbers. To be more specific, let $\text{Seq}(\mathbb Q)$ be the set of all Cauchy sequences of rational numbers and ...
Eduardo Magalhães's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
62 views

On constructive calculus of variations

I am looking for a constructive treatment of calculus of variations and, a bit more generally, infinite-dimensional vector spaces. To a certain extent, my problem is that I am not sure what the right ...
yoshi's user avatar
  • 138
2 votes
1 answer
52 views

Constructively, under what conditions is $x < y \vee y < x$ an apartness relation?

A binary relation $⧣$ on a set $A$ is called an apartness relation if it satisifies the following three properties: irreflexivity: for all $x \in A$, $\neg (x ⧣ x)$; symmetry: for all $x,y \in A$, if ...
Ian Maxwell's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
122 views

Class functions in constructive set theory

In Aczel’s book (draft) on constructive set theory (https://www1.maths.leeds.ac.uk/~rathjen/book.pdf) there is a proposition (4.2.4 on page 34) regarding when a class function exists. I’m not ...
ToucanIan's user avatar
  • 209
2 votes
4 answers
244 views

Is the dual of Cantor's theorem provable without choice? without excluded middle?

For the sake of concreteness let's say we're talking about ZF, though I imagine this question can be asked for any 'typical' set theory without a choice axiom (and would prefer an answer that doesn't ...
Ian Maxwell's user avatar
14 votes
2 answers
630 views

law of excluded middle from subsets of finite sets being finite in “five stages of accepting constructive mathematics”

i’m reading andrej bauer’s five stages of accepting constructive mathematics (after watching his excellent talk of the same name). here i stumbled upon a curiosity. on page 6 of the document, he ...
windfish's user avatar
  • 429
2 votes
1 answer
186 views

Intuitionistic Disproof of Intermediate Value Theorem

For uni I'm studying intuitionism, and I came across the following disproof for the IVT: The thing I'm trying to understand is why this disproof is not valid in classical mathematics. In my research ...
Jord van Eldik's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
203 views

distribution of disjunction and conjunction over each other in intuitionistic logic

I can't find any references as to whether or not the usual properties of disjunction and conjunction distributing over each other hold in intuitionistic logic. Consider: $$(1) \ \ (p \vee (q \& r))...
provocateur's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
228 views

A Reference From Andrej Bauer's Recent Talk on Countable Reals

Andrej Bauer gave a talk today in the topos institute colloquium (video here) announcing a proof that the dedekind reals can be countable in the absence of LEM and CC. At roughly the 27 minute mark, ...
HallaSurvivor's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
28 views

Show the rational representation of e "converges to e" under constructive math, i.e. show that $\sum _{k=j+1}^i \frac{1}{k!} \le \frac{1}{n}$.

I'm trying to show that $e$ has a representation in constructive mathematics from Wikipedia's definition of convergence and definition of finite e. Here is their definition of "convergence": ...
Jerry Randle's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
47 views

Make n numbers equal

Given $n$ rational numbers. Every time you can delete $2$ numbers, and add 2 numbers which are equal to $\frac{a+b}{2}$ (assume the number you delete is $a$ and $b$). How to judge whether it is ...
jh w's user avatar
  • 11
0 votes
0 answers
47 views

Zermelo-Fraenkel versus Constructive-Zermelo-Fraenkel

Let's suppose that a particular theorem cannot be proved in ZF (for example, because I have a counterexample in ZF). Is it possible that the theorem hold in CZF?
effezeta's user avatar
  • 275
2 votes
1 answer
99 views

“Large” Dependent Choice in IZF

The scheme of “large dependent choice” (LDC) consists of statements of the form Suppose $\forall x \exists y P(x,y)$. Then for all $z$, there is some infinite sequence $\{s_i\}_{i \in \mathbb{N}}$ ...
Mark Saving's user avatar
  • 29.8k
1 vote
1 answer
44 views

Constructive proof that AOC implies every subset has a complement

I am studying Bridges' Varieties of Constructive Mathematics. Exercise 7 in the first chapter is confounding to me. I don't know how the hinted proof strategy works. Let $A$ be a subset of a set $B$. ...
Xiaoyu Liu's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
11