Questions tagged [categorical-logic]

Categorical logic is a study of semantics constructed by categories.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
1 answer
59 views

"Axioms are the containments in $C$."

On the nlab page for internal logic it says The Internal Logic as a Functor As described above, a model of a given theory $T$ in a category $C$ consists of an assignment \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 791
1 vote
0 answers
49 views

Free monoidal category out of multicategory

There's a known adjoint pair $Cat \rightarrow MonCat \dashv MonCat \rightarrow Cat$. See here. The question is: is there a similar construction $Multicat \rightarrow MonCat \dashv MonCat \rightarrow ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 791
0 votes
1 answer
61 views

A subobject is regarded as a proposition - internal logic

a subobject $\ \phi\hookrightarrow A\ $ is regarded as a proposition: by thinking of it as the subcollection of all those things of type $A$ for which the statement $\phi$ is true First of all I ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 791
1 vote
0 answers
68 views

A doctrine is a categorification of a theory

So it says in the nlab page of doctrine. Let's focus on first order theories for simplicity. I have two questions, one regarding vertical categorification and another regarding horizontal ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 791
5 votes
0 answers
73 views

Images are stable under pullback if and only if covers are

Let's say that an arrow $ f\colon X\to Y $ in a category $ \mathcal C $ have an image if there exists a mono $ \iota\colon \operatorname{Im} f\rightarrowtail Y $ through which $ f $ factors, such that ...
GeometriaDifferenziale's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
214 views

What *is* a geometric formula?

In logic (and categorical logic) one learns that infinitary logic is like finitary logic, only that the formulas may contain set-indexed disjunctions and conjuctions such as $\bigvee_{i\in I}\phi_i$. ...
Nico's user avatar
  • 3,998
0 votes
1 answer
67 views

Conditions on when a functor $F: Syn_0 \to Set$ arises from a model

In Lecture 4 of Lurie's notes on categorical logic, it is proved when a functor $F: Syn_0(T) \to Set$ arises from a model of the weak syntactic category. I think I can follow most of the argument, up ...
Proficiscor's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
28 views

What does "full first-order logic" mean?

I see this phrase in the categorical logic literature, but always undefined. What does the "full" mean in "full first-order logic"?
IllogicalUser's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
49 views

What is a Boolean functor?

According to nlab, a coherent functor is a morphism of coherent categories. And a Boolean category is a coherent category where subobject posets are always Boolean algebras. Is a Boolean functor a ...
IllogicalUser's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
92 views

Classifying Topos of a Classical First-order Theory

This nlab page shows a chart describing the structure of the classifying topos of a theory in various logics, but it doesn't have an entry for the classifying topos of a classical first-order theory. ...
IllogicalUser's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
95 views

is the NNO in a sheaf topos a model of classical PA?

In their book Models for Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis Moerdijk and Reyes claim that the natural number object in any Grothendieck topos is a model of all classical provable statements of first order ...
Nico's user avatar
  • 3,998
2 votes
2 answers
128 views

Why is $V(xy)$ the (geometrically correct) union of the two axis (as a scheme)?

Consider $\newcommand{\Spec}{\operatorname{Spec}}V(xy) \subset \Spec \mathbb C[x,y]$ as a closed subscheme. We think of $V(xy)$ as the union of the two axis in $\mathbb A_\mathbb C^2$. But why? The ...
Nico's user avatar
  • 3,998
2 votes
1 answer
79 views

Is there a decent notion of "double Lawvere theory?"

I've been playing with the idea of a "double Lawvere theory" for mechanizing first order logical theories. I've been able to find only a tiny amount of detail online though and want feedback ...
Molly Stewart-Gallus's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
275 views

Linear logic and linearly distributive categories

1. Context On page two of the introduction to their paper Weakly distributive categories on linearly distributive categories Cockett and Seely write: It turns out that these weak distributivity maps, ...
Max Demirdilek's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
204 views

Mistake in B. Jacobs book Categorical Logic and Type Theory?

Lemma 1.8.9 in B. Jacobs book Categorical Logic and Type Theory describes how a collection of fibre-wise adjoints of a morphism of fibrations can be promoted to a global adjoint. Let $p: \mathbb E \...
Nico's user avatar
  • 3,998
2 votes
0 answers
106 views

Name of functor from "Propositions"/"Properties" to "Power set" implied (in part?) by axiom schema of specification?

$\newcommand{\Inj}{\operatorname{Inj}}$$\newcommand{\Prop}{\operatorname{Prop}}$Consider the "category of propositions" or "of properties" $\Prop$, where objects are logical ...
hasManyStupidQuestions's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
91 views

Models of pretoposes vs. models of coherent categories

I'm confused about these lecture notes. Theorem 4 states, roughly, that for each coherent category $C$ there is a pretopos $C^\mathrm{eq}$ such that for any pretopos $D$, morphisms of coherent ...
user1015467's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
54 views

Does the forgetful functor from the category of models of a cartesian theory preserve and create limits?

It is well-known that a monadic functor preserves and creates limits, which in particular shows that any algebraic category, or equivalently, any category of models of an algebraic theory, has limits, ...
Lingyuan Ye's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
73 views

Categories of presheaves with topologies stronger than $\neg\neg$-topology

In any topos, the Lawvere-Tierney topology given by $\neg\neg:\Omega\to\Omega$ is the strongest for which the morphism $0\to 1$ is closed. In most of the examples I am familiar with (admittedly, these ...
Malice Vidrine's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
216 views

Intuition for Exists and Forall functors

This question gives a concise definition of the exists and forall functors, in the form invented (I gather) by Lawvere. Quoting: Let $f:X\rightarrow Y$ be an arrow in $\mathsf{Set}$. $f$ induces ...
Theo H's user avatar
  • 135
8 votes
0 answers
215 views

Precise statement of the syntactic category of a logic/type theory, in maximum generality?

I've been trying to understand the notion of syntactic category for a type theory/logic. This entry in the ncatlab is the closest I've found to a clear explanation. It seems like a fairly good article,...
user56834's user avatar
  • 12.7k
2 votes
0 answers
111 views

categorical logic and computation

After encountering the field of Categorical Logic recently, and more specifically the nLab page on Computational Trilogy as well as this paper, I'm under the impression that we have a pretty complete ...
H. Jenkins's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
217 views

Why realizability topos instead of category of assemblies?

A realizability topos is the exact completion of a category of assemblies. If I understood correctly, the major achievement of the completion is having (1) subobject classifier and (2) finite colimits,...
S.Park's user avatar
  • 61
6 votes
1 answer
163 views

Why is coherence important in the LCCC interpretation of substitution in dependent type theory?

Reading about the categorical models of dependent type theory (DTT) I have faced many articles pointing out the coherence problem for the interpretation of DTT in locally cartesian closed categories (...
Mayk Alves de Andrade's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
31 views

How does the universal property of the classifying category and generic algebra characterize them up to equivalence and isomorphism respectively?

I have been working through a multi-sorted, categorical presentation of equational logic. Given a collection of equations in context $ Th $, there is a syntactic construction of the "classifying ...
user38770's user avatar
  • 549
6 votes
0 answers
134 views

Universal property of the codomain fibration

Let $\mathcal{C}$ a category with pullbacks. Does $\mathsf{cod}: \mathcal{C}^{\to}\to\mathcal{C}$ have any kind of universal property in the category of (co)fibrations over $\mathcal{C}$? I'd want it ...
eta's user avatar
  • 129
1 vote
2 answers
123 views

Decidability of bi-cartesian closed categories

This is actually in reference to the question posed here https://stackoverflow.com/posts/66285948/edit but is more appropriate as a question to be posed on a non-coding site. I provide a partial ...
Lydia Marie Williamson's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
64 views

Which context weakening rules are derivable in this system of equational logic?

I am trying to work through Andrew Pitts' chapter on categorical logic: Categorical Logic. On page 7 he presents a system of equational logic. The rules are listed below: $$\dfrac{}{M = M : \sigma \ [\...
user38770's user avatar
  • 549
3 votes
1 answer
175 views

Strong induction for natural number object

From Lawvere's paper about ETCS we know that we can do induction for natural number object. My aim is to prove the strong induction principle for an NNO in a topos by translating this argument https://...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 3,813
1 vote
0 answers
73 views

Proving the following is a equalizer by proving factorization for $1$ implies factorization for every object

I am reading the following document about Lawvere's ETCS: http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/11/tr11.pdf My question is about Theorem 6 in this document. The aim is to prove an equivalence ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 3,813
1 vote
0 answers
110 views

Existence of subobject classifier in Lawvere's ETCS

I am reading this document: http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/11/tr11.pdf Compared with the ordinary definition of a topos, the axioms of ETCS do not assume the existence of a subobject ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 3,813
1 vote
1 answer
396 views

Why is intuitionistic type theory without dependent types more powerful than Martin-Löf type theory?

In the preface of Introduction to higher order categorical logic, Lambek and Scott write (emphasis mine): [L]ogicians have made three attempts to formulate higher order logic, in increasing power: ...
user828672's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
81 views

Counterexample to Frobenius reciprocity in a 1st-order classical hyperdoctrine?

Is there an intuitively-reasonable hyperdoctrine for classical first-order logic that doesn't satisfy the Frobenius condition, eg where $[\exists y. P^*(x) \land Q(x, y)] \ne [P(x) \land \exists y. Q(...
Nate's user avatar
  • 2,205
2 votes
0 answers
54 views

Defining truth in a topos model

My colleague and I are working through Goldblatt's Topoi, and we're stuck on exercise 2 in chapter 11, section 4. The exercise is to show that $\|\phi\|^m \circ f = \|\phi\|^m \circ h$, for any ...
John Hill's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
155 views

What is a logical formula in the language of categories? How can we express basic model theoretic concepts categorically?

At the beginning of a course in Model Theory, one is introduced to the definition of signature, structure and homomorphism. It is then clear that the class of all structures over a fixed signature $L$ ...
Francesco Bilotta's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
103 views

Syntactic category of a geometric theory has finite limits.

Let $T$ be a geometric theory. Consider the syntactic category $C_T$. I want to show that $C_T$ has all finite limits. To show this, it is enough to show that it has finite products and equalizers. ...
Pouya Layeghi's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
885 views

The legitimacy of topos theory and intuitionism.

This is an exercise in critical thinking. I am not looking, therefore, for opinions on the matter; rather: I would like to know the evidence (whatever that might mean). Background: I have a ...
Shaun's user avatar
  • 43.6k
2 votes
0 answers
96 views

Which limit sketches produce Grothendieck toposes?

A limit sketch $\mathcal S=(\mathcal A,L)$ consists of a small category $\mathcal{A}$, together with a set $L$ of cones in $\mathcal A$. A model (in the category of sets) of a limit sketch is a ...
Lukas Stoll's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
205 views

Logic and adjunctions with ideals in ring theory

Studying ring theory, I remarked two things in the context of ideals that look like some interpretation of a logic in the ideals of a ring (I never studied this subject so my formulation is quite ...
Dabouliplop's user avatar
  • 2,061
2 votes
1 answer
138 views

Sorting out what's true in the generic model in the classifying topos of a theory

I'm interested in trying to understand the generic model in the classifying topos of a particular coherent theory$^1$, and more specifically trying to sort out what non-coherent formulae hold in said ...
Malice Vidrine's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
168 views

Hyperdoctrines and Contravariance

I've been reading through the extremely useful discussion of First-Order Categorial Logic that recently popped up over at The Diagonal Argument. But when I compare Baez and Weiss's construction to ...
Tom's user avatar
  • 23
2 votes
1 answer
410 views

An $\omega$-categorical theory $T$ with no finite models is complete.

I'm trying to understand the following proof of this result, but I don't understand: where the assumption that $T$ has no finite models is used; why the final step is valid. Take two models $\...
probablystuck's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
27 views

Basic Constructive Modal Logic and Monoidal Endofunctors

I'm reading this paper by Kakutani : http://nicosia.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~kakutani/files/aplas07.pdf but I can't see how to use naturality of $m$ (given by the monoidal endofunctor modelling $\Box$) ...
user659207's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
235 views

If a Grothendieck topos has a geometric morphism to $Sets$, then it is unique

In Caramello, Theories, Sites, Toposes, I read that Every Grothendieck topos $\mathcal E$ admits a unique (up to isomorphism) geoemtric morphism $\gamma_{\mathcal E}:\mathcal E\to \bf Set$. The ...
W. Rether's user avatar
  • 3,080
2 votes
1 answer
425 views

Universal quantifiers in category theory

I’ve recently learned about the curry howard isomorphism for dependent type theory, and I’m now interested in learning about how to capture this in category theory. I believe that I understand how to ...
user56834's user avatar
  • 12.7k
0 votes
1 answer
181 views

Introduction to categorical logic and CHL-correspondence?

My motivation for this question is that I’m interested in using categorical logic/category theory to intuitively visualize and think about proofs in advanced type-theory based proof-assistants like ...
user56834's user avatar
  • 12.7k
3 votes
2 answers
355 views

Universal properties of universal and existential quantification

In the paper What You Needa Know about Yoneda, Boisseau and Gibbons appeal to the universal properties of universal and existential quantification in order to derive the "co-Yoneda" data type: $$ \...
Dan Oneață's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

How to categorically characterize the structure of all grounded first-order logic formulas?

If the notion of topos corresponds to set theory or first-order logic, then what if one is only interested in grounded logic formulas, ie, formulas that don't contain variables? In a topos one has ...
Yan King Yin's user avatar
  • 1,183
2 votes
1 answer
134 views

What is a presentation of a Lawvere theory formally, and how do you generate the associated Lawvere theory?

A Lawvere theory for a specific algebraic theory is usually given by some sort of presentation. You have generating functions and constants $f_i:A^n \to A$, and relations $(r_1,r_2) \in ``\mathrm{Hom}(...
Daniel Satanove's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
122 views

Internal equality for Eq-fibrations

In Jacob's Categorical logic and Type Theory in relation to fibrations with equality the author gives the following definition: ...call two morphisms of Eq-fibrations $(K,H),(H',K') \colon p \to q$ ...
Giorgio Mossa's user avatar