Skip to main content

Questions tagged [categorical-logic]

Categorical logic is a study of semantics constructed by categories.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
1 answer
42 views

Equivalence between equality as a left adjoint and as a right adjoint

Given a hyperdoctrine $P : C^{op} → HA$ it is common to define equality as a left adjoint to contraction $$ \dfrac{weak(φ) ∧ =_σ ⊢ ψ : P\ (σ × σ)}{φ ⊢ contr(ψ) : P\ σ} $$ Here $$weak := P\ π : P\ \...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
1 vote
1 answer
55 views

Explicit definition of cartesian multicategories

In the definition of cartesian multicategories of the nlab it says "symmetric multicategory [equiped with contraction and deletion operations ...] which satisfy certain evident axioms". In ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
1 vote
0 answers
23 views

Symmetry of cartesian multicategories in first order logic syntax

Cartesian multicategories are symmetric multicategories with a weakening and contraction operations. When thinking of multicategories as some kind of "algebra" (?) of terms of first order ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
2 votes
0 answers
114 views

About F.Lawvere article "AN ELEMENTARY THEORY OF THE CATEGORY OF SETS"

reference articles: [L] AN ELEMENTARY THEORY OF THE CATEGORY OF SETS (LONG VERSION) WITH COMMENTARY, F. WILLIAM LAWVERE (http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/11/tr11.pdf) [T] Topos theory, P....
Buschi Sergio's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
45 views

Categoriсal perspective on the Disjuntion property of the intuitionistic propositional calculus

I came about four different proofs of the disjunction property: formulated in the language of Heyting algebras; done using Kripke models; using the fact that every topological space is an open ...
Georgii's user avatar
  • 88
1 vote
1 answer
58 views

Morphism between product types as a product of diagonal maps

I am trying to follow this post https://ncatlab.org/toddtrimble/show/Notes+on+predicate+logic and I got confused on this paragraph: From this point of view, a morphism between product types is a ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,267
1 vote
1 answer
65 views

Models of a slice of coherent category

I am trying to get some sense of the proof of Theorem 10 in this link. https://www.math.ias.edu/%7Elurie/278xnotes/Lecture6-Completeness.pdf Immediately after it, Exercise 11 says a model of coherent ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,267
0 votes
1 answer
51 views

Prove two versions of Godel’s completeness are equivalent

In this notes: https://www.math.ias.edu/~lurie/278xnotes/Lecture6-Completeness.pdf Lurie says Theorem 5 implies Theorem 9 by adding constants and an axiom demands that the newly added constants ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,267
1 vote
0 answers
40 views

Understanding the proof of Giraud's Theorem

I am trying to understand the proof of a lemma of Giraud's Theorem in Lurie's notes on categorical logic: https://www.math.ias.edu/~lurie/278xnotes/Lecture10-Giraud.pdf I am confused by the proof of ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,267
2 votes
1 answer
76 views

Monomorphism to $\{\emptyset.\top\}$ implies equivalence to a sentence

I remember from a discussion the statement: In the context category (I think of some geometric theory, but I do not think the property of theory matters.) If $\{\vec{x}. \varphi\}\overset{[\theta]}\to ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,267
1 vote
2 answers
95 views

Explicit geometric machinery to check the truth of FOL formula

It is standard to use the semantics of topological spaces for checking the truth value of propositional formula in the absence of excluded middle. An explicit description is written down here, for ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,267
0 votes
1 answer
65 views

How are existential quantifiers present in the internal logic of regular categories?

Intuitively speaking, how do existential quantifiers appear? I'm just starting to get familiar with these definitions. Top and conjunctions appear because of finite products. (Plus, I assume, ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
0 votes
1 answer
83 views

Deducing the definition of subobject classifier from Sub functor being representable

As the title says. Let's consider some category $C$ and the contravariant functor $Sub : C^{op} \rightarrow Set$ that for each object gives its set of subobjects. The introductory book by Leinster ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
1 vote
0 answers
67 views

Are the "intramural" and "extramural" definitions of "set" from category theory equivalent?

Note: This question takes a pluralistic / "multiverse" view of sets (including "classes" and "collections") and set theories. My understanding (from reading many nLab ...
hasManyStupidQuestions's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
63 views

$Lang$ of a Hyperdoctrine

$$Form \dashv Lang : Hyp \rightarrow FOL$$ We consider an object of $FOL$ to be a signature made of sorts, function symbols and relation symbols, together with a set of axioms of first order logic. ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
2 votes
1 answer
85 views

Definition of structure over first order hyperdoctrine

I'm having trouble understanding this definition. I use Hyperdoctrine in the sense of Pitts. I know the word hyperdoctrine is very loaded so let me give some definitions before the actual question ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
1 vote
0 answers
50 views

How to define terms categorically before constructing the classifying category (Equational Logic)

I'm reading Pitts' Categorical logic and I'm having a hard time with some basic things. My goal is to construct the classifying category and give its universal property, but I wanted to understand a ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
2 votes
2 answers
140 views

"Classical" bicartesian closed category?

Every Heyting algebra can be thought of as a bicartesian closed category through which is also a poset. We may interpret classical logic in a Heyting algebra if we ask of their pseudocomplements to be ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
1 vote
1 answer
72 views

"Axioms are the containments in $C$."

On the nlab page for internal logic it says The Internal Logic as a Functor As described above, a model of a given theory $T$ in a category $C$ consists of an assignment \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
1 vote
0 answers
62 views

Free monoidal category out of multicategory

There's a known adjoint pair $Cat \rightarrow MonCat \dashv MonCat \rightarrow Cat$. See here. The question is: is there a similar construction $Multicat \rightarrow MonCat \dashv MonCat \rightarrow ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
0 votes
1 answer
80 views

A subobject is regarded as a proposition - internal logic

a subobject $\ \phi\hookrightarrow A\ $ is regarded as a proposition: by thinking of it as the subcollection of all those things of type $A$ for which the statement $\phi$ is true First of all I ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
1 vote
0 answers
97 views

A doctrine is a categorification of a theory

So it says in the nlab page of doctrine. Let's focus on first order theories for simplicity. I have two questions, one regarding vertical categorification and another regarding horizontal ...
Julián's user avatar
  • 1,459
5 votes
0 answers
109 views

Images are stable under pullback if and only if covers are

Let's say that an arrow $ f\colon X\to Y $ in a category $ \mathcal C $ have an image if there exists a mono $ \iota\colon \operatorname{Im} f\rightarrowtail Y $ through which $ f $ factors, such that ...
GeometriaDifferenziale's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
245 views

What *is* a geometric formula?

In logic (and categorical logic) one learns that infinitary logic is like finitary logic, only that the formulas may contain set-indexed disjunctions and conjuctions such as $\bigvee_{i\in I}\phi_i$. ...
Nico's user avatar
  • 4,360
0 votes
1 answer
71 views

Conditions on when a functor $F: Syn_0 \to Set$ arises from a model

In Lecture 4 of Lurie's notes on categorical logic, it is proved when a functor $F: Syn_0(T) \to Set$ arises from a model of the weak syntactic category. I think I can follow most of the argument, up ...
Proficiscor's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
33 views

What does "full first-order logic" mean?

I see this phrase in the categorical logic literature, but always undefined. What does the "full" mean in "full first-order logic"?
IllogicalUser's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
111 views

Classifying Topos of a Classical First-order Theory

This nlab page shows a chart describing the structure of the classifying topos of a theory in various logics, but it doesn't have an entry for the classifying topos of a classical first-order theory. ...
IllogicalUser's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
118 views

is the NNO in a sheaf topos a model of classical PA?

In their book Models for Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis Moerdijk and Reyes claim that the natural number object in any Grothendieck topos is a model of all classical provable statements of first order ...
Nico's user avatar
  • 4,360
2 votes
2 answers
154 views

Why is $V(xy)$ the (geometrically correct) union of the two axis (as a scheme)?

Consider $\newcommand{\Spec}{\operatorname{Spec}}V(xy) \subset \Spec \mathbb C[x,y]$ as a closed subscheme. We think of $V(xy)$ as the union of the two axis in $\mathbb A_\mathbb C^2$. But why? The ...
Nico's user avatar
  • 4,360
2 votes
1 answer
83 views

Is there a decent notion of "double Lawvere theory?"

I've been playing with the idea of a "double Lawvere theory" for mechanizing first order logical theories. I've been able to find only a tiny amount of detail online though and want feedback ...
Ms. Molly Stewart-Gallus's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
302 views

Linear logic and linearly distributive categories

1. Context On page two of the introduction to their paper Weakly distributive categories on linearly distributive categories Cockett and Seely write: It turns out that these weak distributivity maps, ...
Max Demirdilek's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
214 views

Mistake in B. Jacobs book Categorical Logic and Type Theory?

Lemma 1.8.9 in B. Jacobs book Categorical Logic and Type Theory describes how a collection of fibre-wise adjoints of a morphism of fibrations can be promoted to a global adjoint. Let $p: \mathbb E \...
Nico's user avatar
  • 4,360
2 votes
0 answers
108 views

Name of functor from "Propositions"/"Properties" to "Power set" implied (in part?) by axiom schema of specification?

$\newcommand{\Inj}{\operatorname{Inj}}$$\newcommand{\Prop}{\operatorname{Prop}}$Consider the "category of propositions" or "of properties" $\Prop$, where objects are logical ...
hasManyStupidQuestions's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
103 views

Models of pretoposes vs. models of coherent categories

I'm confused about these lecture notes. Theorem 4 states, roughly, that for each coherent category $C$ there is a pretopos $C^\mathrm{eq}$ such that for any pretopos $D$, morphisms of coherent ...
user1015467's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
62 views

Does the forgetful functor from the category of models of a cartesian theory preserve and create limits?

It is well-known that a monadic functor preserves and creates limits, which in particular shows that any algebraic category, or equivalently, any category of models of an algebraic theory, has limits, ...
Lingyuan Ye's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
78 views

Categories of presheaves with topologies stronger than $\neg\neg$-topology

In any topos, the Lawvere-Tierney topology given by $\neg\neg:\Omega\to\Omega$ is the strongest for which the morphism $0\to 1$ is closed. In most of the examples I am familiar with (admittedly, these ...
Malice Vidrine's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
263 views

Intuition for Exists and Forall functors

This question gives a concise definition of the exists and forall functors, in the form invented (I gather) by Lawvere. Quoting: Let $f:X\rightarrow Y$ be an arrow in $\mathsf{Set}$. $f$ induces ...
Theo H's user avatar
  • 257
8 votes
0 answers
243 views

Precise statement of the syntactic category of a logic/type theory, in maximum generality?

I've been trying to understand the notion of syntactic category for a type theory/logic. This entry in the ncatlab is the closest I've found to a clear explanation. It seems like a fairly good article,...
user56834's user avatar
  • 13.1k
2 votes
0 answers
128 views

categorical logic and computation

After encountering the field of Categorical Logic recently, and more specifically the nLab page on Computational Trilogy as well as this paper, I'm under the impression that we have a pretty complete ...
H. Jenkins's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
262 views

Why realizability topos instead of category of assemblies?

A realizability topos is the exact completion of a category of assemblies. If I understood correctly, the major achievement of the completion is having (1) subobject classifier and (2) finite colimits,...
S.Park's user avatar
  • 61
6 votes
1 answer
191 views

Why is coherence important in the LCCC interpretation of substitution in dependent type theory?

Reading about the categorical models of dependent type theory (DTT) I have faced many articles pointing out the coherence problem for the interpretation of DTT in locally cartesian closed categories (...
Mayk Alves de Andrade's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
31 views

How does the universal property of the classifying category and generic algebra characterize them up to equivalence and isomorphism respectively?

I have been working through a multi-sorted, categorical presentation of equational logic. Given a collection of equations in context $ Th $, there is a syntactic construction of the "classifying ...
user38770's user avatar
  • 549
6 votes
0 answers
139 views

Universal property of the codomain fibration

Let $\mathcal{C}$ a category with pullbacks. Does $\mathsf{cod}: \mathcal{C}^{\to}\to\mathcal{C}$ have any kind of universal property in the category of (co)fibrations over $\mathcal{C}$? I'd want it ...
eta's user avatar
  • 129
2 votes
2 answers
154 views

Decidability of bi-cartesian closed categories

This is actually in reference to the question posed here https://stackoverflow.com/posts/66285948/edit but is more appropriate as a question to be posed on a non-coding site. I provide a partial ...
Lydia Marie Williamson's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
67 views

Which context weakening rules are derivable in this system of equational logic?

I am trying to work through Andrew Pitts' chapter on categorical logic: Categorical Logic. On page 7 he presents a system of equational logic. The rules are listed below: $$\dfrac{}{M = M : \sigma \ [\...
user38770's user avatar
  • 549
3 votes
1 answer
189 views

Strong induction for natural number object

From Lawvere's paper about ETCS we know that we can do induction for natural number object. My aim is to prove the strong induction principle for an NNO in a topos by translating this argument https://...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,267
1 vote
0 answers
74 views

Proving the following is a equalizer by proving factorization for $1$ implies factorization for every object

I am reading the following document about Lawvere's ETCS: http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/11/tr11.pdf My question is about Theorem 6 in this document. The aim is to prove an equivalence ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,267
1 vote
0 answers
114 views

Existence of subobject classifier in Lawvere's ETCS

I am reading this document: http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/reprints/articles/11/tr11.pdf Compared with the ordinary definition of a topos, the axioms of ETCS do not assume the existence of a subobject ...
Y.X.'s user avatar
  • 4,267
1 vote
1 answer
463 views

Why is intuitionistic type theory without dependent types more powerful than Martin-Löf type theory?

In the preface of Introduction to higher order categorical logic, Lambek and Scott write (emphasis mine): [L]ogicians have made three attempts to formulate higher order logic, in increasing power: ...
user828672's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
91 views

Counterexample to Frobenius reciprocity in a 1st-order classical hyperdoctrine?

Is there an intuitively-reasonable hyperdoctrine for classical first-order logic that doesn't satisfy the Frobenius condition, eg where $[\exists y. P^*(x) \land Q(x, y)] \ne [P(x) \land \exists y. Q(...
Nate's user avatar
  • 2,225