If we consider the Cantor staircase function, let us say $f:[0,1]\to\mathbb{R}$, as a distribution, I was wondering whether there is an explicit way to express its generalised derivative as a distribution, which is defined by$$\varphi\mapsto-\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f(x)\varphi'(x)dx$$where $\varphi$ is a fundamental function, i.e. an infinitely differentiable function equal to 0 outside a finite interval.

I am not sure whether there is a "more direct" way to express it and I have not been able to find one -I already find it quite difficult to handle the definition of $f$, which I find quite clear here-, but I think it is an interesting issue. Thank you very much for any contribution!


The distributional derivative of any increasing function is a positive measure on the real line. The Wikipedia article hints at what this measure is for the Cantor function $f$:

[the Cantor function] is the cumulative probability distribution function of a random variable that is uniformly distributed on the Cantor set. This distribution, called the Cantor distribution, has no discrete part. That is, the corresponding measure is atomless.

The measure $f'$ can be described as the pushforward of the Lebesgue measure under the map described in terms of binary and ternary expansions as: $$0.01100010111_2\mapsto 0.02200020222_3$$ Alternatively, the measure can be obtained as the limit of the natural measures on pre-Cantor sets: just restrict the Lebesgue measure to pre-Cantor set $C_n$ and normalize it so that the total measure is $1$. Let's call the resulting measure $\mu_n$. The weak* limit of $\mu_n$ exists and is the distributional derivative of the Cantor function.

And here is why. Let $f_n$ be the cumulative distribution function of $\mu_n$. Then $f_n$ is continuous and piecewise linear; in particular it's a Lipschitz function. Hence, its distributional derivative is its pointwise derivative, which is [the density function of] $\mu_n$. Observe that $f_n$ converge uniformly to the Cantor function $f$. Uniform convergence implies convergence in the sense of distributions. And when $f_n\to f$ distributionally, it follows that $f_n'\to f'$ distributionally.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.