2
$\begingroup$

I have one query, concerning the newest edition of this monograph.

  1. At page 7, section 1.2, at the bottom of the page, it's written that: " It is easily seen that $\zeta(s)=2$ for $s=\alpha$, where $\alpha$ is a real number greater than 1..."

I am quite sure that for $\alpha=2$ which is real and greater than 1, $ \zeta(s)=\frac{\pi^2}{6} \neq 2$, what do you think did Titchamarsh meant here?!

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Irrelevant comment: I looked for Titchmarsh on Google Books, and they appear to have it filed under "Architecture > History > General"! $\endgroup$ – David Loeffler Jan 16 '12 at 16:03
4
$\begingroup$

I will take a stab at this. I think he is saying that for some real number $s > 1$, $\zeta(s) = 2.$ We know that on the interval $(1,\infty)$ the $\zeta$ function is continuous and monotonically decreasing. Since $\zeta(t) \to \infty$ as $t \downarrow 1$ and $\zeta(2) = \pi^2/6 < 2$, there must be some $s \in(1,2)$ with $\zeta(s) = 2.$

His writing somewhat obscures the existential nature of the statement he is making.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In short, T is saying $\zeta(\alpha)=2$ for some $\alpha$, not claiming $\zeta(\alpha)=2$ for every $\alpha$. $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Jan 16 '12 at 20:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I wonder why T is cheap with words. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – MathematicalPhysicist Jan 17 '12 at 9:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.