1
$\begingroup$

I have $$H(\psi_1(t),\psi_2(t),x_1(t),x_2(t),u(t))= -1 + \psi_1(3x_1+x_2) + \psi_2(4x_1+3x_2 +u)$$

Note: $\psi_1 = -2Ae^t + 2Be^{5t}$, $\psi_2 = Ae^t + Be^{5t}$

Hence we have

$$\frac{\partial H}{\partial u}=\psi_2$$

$$\frac{\partial^2 H}{\partial u^2}= 0 $$

What... I always get some $\frac{\partial^2 H}{\partial u^2}= f(u,\psi_i) $

The second derivative test failed,now what??

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It seems to me that $\dfrac{\partial H}{\partial u}=\psi_2'$, not $\psi_2$. Then $\dfrac{\partial^2 H}{\partial u^2}=\psi_2''=Ae^{4x_1+3x_2+u}+25Be^{5(4x_1+3x_2+u)}$. What are you trying to show? $\endgroup$ – robjohn Oct 28 '14 at 14:33
  • $\begingroup$ @robjohn $\psi_2' = -\frac{\partial H}{\partial x_2}$. Where did $\frac{\partial H}{\partial u} = \psi_2'$ come from? $\endgroup$ – Partly Putrid Pile of Pus Oct 29 '14 at 6:38
  • $\begingroup$ Your notation is very confusing. You write $\psi_1(t)=-2Ae^t+2Be^{5t}$ and $\psi_2(t)=Ae^t+Be^{5t}$, yet $H(\psi_1,\psi_2,x_1,x_2,u)=-1+\color{#C00000}{\psi_1}(3x_1+x_2) +\color{#C00000}{\psi_2}(4x_1+3x_2+u)$. Perhaps you meant the red $\psi_k$'s not to be functional applications. Would it be accurate to say instead $H(\psi_1,\psi_2,x_1,x_2,u)=-1+(3x_1+x_2)\psi_1+(4x_1+3x_2+u)\psi_2$? $\endgroup$ – robjohn Oct 29 '14 at 7:24
  • $\begingroup$ @robjohn Oh my god wow, I am sorry, I didn't even think of it that way. The problem came in that I derived $\psi_1$ & $\psi_2$ after trying to find that $\frac{\partial H}{\partial u}$ $\endgroup$ – Partly Putrid Pile of Pus Oct 29 '14 at 11:23
  • $\begingroup$ @robjohn Note a friend is working on this with me, here: meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/4666/… . We are solving a question by another user, and it is similar content to in class exam soon $\endgroup$ – Partly Putrid Pile of Pus Oct 29 '14 at 11:24
0
$\begingroup$

Base on your calculation, I guess $\psi_1$, $\psi_2$ are constants. In that case, $H$ is linear (or rather affine). Hence, $H$ doesn't have any critical points. That said, you shouldn't be applying second derivative test here.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ All of $x_1,x_2,u$ are functions of time, and I want to maximise $H$ as a function of $u$ $\endgroup$ – Partly Putrid Pile of Pus Oct 28 '14 at 7:54
  • $\begingroup$ and $\psi_1 = -2Ae^t + 2Be^{5t}$ and $\psi_2 = Ae^t + Be^{5t}$ $\endgroup$ – Partly Putrid Pile of Pus Oct 28 '14 at 7:58
  • $\begingroup$ Still, $H$ is linear in $u$, no critical points. It doesn't work unless you are maximizing $H$ as a function of $t$ and $u$ (which you should, as you are using partial derivatives here). $\endgroup$ – Quang Hoang Oct 28 '14 at 8:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.