Let $\{ e_i \}$ be a basis for $V$, then the space of tensors $V \otimes V$ could be identified with the space of all formal sums $\sum_{ij} \alpha_{ij} (e_i, e_j)$ (I know a base independent approach would be preferable, but I want to keep it short).

In the finite-dimensional setting each tensor $T = \sum_{ij} \alpha_{ij} (e_i \times e_j)$ could be identified with a bilinear map $T(u,v) = \sum_{ij} \alpha_{ij} \cdot e_i^*(u) \cdot e_j^*(v)$, where $e_i^*$ denotes the dual basis element defined by $e_i^*(e_j) := \delta_{ij}$, vice versa each bilinear map $T : U \times V \to K$ could be written as a tensor, because the maps $\{ \phi_{ij} \}$ with $\phi_{ij}(u,v) := e_i^*(u)\cdot e_j^*(u,v)$ form a basis of the space of all bilinear maps.

Now for a vector space $V$ set $A(V) := \mbox{span}\{ v \otimes v : v \in V \}$ and define $V \wedge V := V \otimes V / A(V)$. Now I read that $V \wedge V$ could be identified with the space of all alternating forms $V \times V \to K$ (and in many differential geometry books it is defined that way). But how is this identification achieved?

Now I computed an example for $V \wedge V$, let $V = \mathbb R^2$ and let $e_1, e_2$ be the standard bases, then a basis of $V \otimes V$ is $(e_1, e_1), (e_1, e_2), (e_2, e_1), (e_2, e_2)$. And for $v = \alpha e_1 + \beta e_2$ we have $$ v \otimes v = \alpha^2 (e_1, e_1) + \alpha \beta (e_1, e_2) + \beta \alpha (e_2,e_1) + \beta^2 (e_2, e_2) $$ looking at the coordinates, I found that $A(V)$ equals the space where the second and third coordinates equals, i.e. we have $$ A(V) = \mbox{span}\{ (e_1, e_1), (e_2, e_2), (e_1, e_2) + (e_2, e_1) \} $$ and these vector form a basis. With the above interpretation I found that $A(V)$ equals the space of all symmetric bilinear forms.

Now consider $V \wedge V = V \otimes V / A(V)$, then this space is $1$-dimensional, and because $(e_1, e_2) \notin A(V)$ we have $$ V \wedge V = \mbox{span}\{ (e_1, e_2) + A(V) \}. $$

So now in what sense could $V \wedge V$ be identified with the space of all alternating bilinear maps? For example when I try an approach similar as the above, I would identify $\alpha(e_1, e_2) + v$ and $v = \beta(e_1, e_1) + \gamma(e_2, e_2) + \delta( (e_1,e_2) + (e_2, e_1) ) \in A(V)$ with $$ \varphi(u,v) = \alpha e_1^*(u)e_2^*(v) + \beta e_1^*(u)e_1^*(v) + \gamma e_2^*(u)e_2^*(v) + \delta e_1^*(u)e_2^*(v) + \delta e_2^*(u)e_1^*(v). $$ But then not every such element gives an alternating form, for example $(e_1, e_2) + v$ itself, the map $\varphi(u,v) = e_1^*(u) \cdot e_2^*(v)$ is not alternating because $\varphi(e_1, e_2) = 1$, but $\varphi(e_2, e_1) = 0$.

So what went wrong here, and how could this identification achieved?

  • $\begingroup$ for dimension two there is only one base alternating bilinear map which is the determinant of 2x2 matrices, so any other bilinear map is a scalar multiple of this. $\endgroup$ – janmarqz Oct 24 '14 at 2:06
  • $\begingroup$ I know that this space must have dimension $1$ in this case (and dimension $\binom{n}{2}$ in general), I asked about the specific identification and how is it related to my example/computation. $\endgroup$ – StefanH Oct 24 '14 at 9:01
  • $\begingroup$ Ok.. in the other hand you can get alternating bilinear maps if you choose the components $\alpha_{ij}$ satisfying the antisymmetry condition i.e. $\alpha_{ij}=-\alpha_{ji}$ and choosing as basis for the subspace generated by $e^*_i\wedge e^*_j:=e^*_i\otimes e^*_j-e^*_j\otimes e^*_i$. Observe that $e^*_i\wedge e^*_j(v,w)=v_iw_j-v_jw_i$ $\endgroup$ – janmarqz Oct 25 '14 at 19:43

The main trick here is

$$(x+y) \otimes (x+y) - x \otimes x - y \otimes y = x \otimes y + y \otimes x $$

I bet you're making things much harder by trying to do things in terms of a basis, rather than using tensor algebra.

Also, you're probably contributing to your confusion by identifying elements of $V \otimes V$ with as bilinear forms on $V$: it would be better to identify them with bilinear forms on $V^*$, or consider $V^* \otimes V^*$ instead.

  • $\begingroup$ How is this "main trick" applied, sorry I do not understand... $\endgroup$ – StefanH Oct 22 '14 at 22:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Stefan: On the one hand, I had misread your posting, and was trying to hint at something related to my misreading. But on the other hand, recognizing that $\wedge$ is antisymmetric is useful anyways. You can actually find an injective homomorphism $V \wedge V \to V \otimes V$. Either way, I think my other comments still apply. $\endgroup$ – Hurkyl Oct 22 '14 at 23:22
  • $\begingroup$ Surely is there an injection $V \wedge V \to V \otimes V$, because it is a quotient, every representation system would give such an injection... but in what way is this related to my question, what have my construction's to to with the correspondence between $V \wedge V$ and the space of alternating linear forms? $\endgroup$ – StefanH Oct 22 '14 at 23:38
  • $\begingroup$ But, it is of interest consider elements $Q$ of $V\otimes V$ as a bilinear form $V\times V\to \mathbb{F}$ defined via $(v,w)\mapsto v^{\top}[Q]w$, where $[Q]$ is the matrix $[Q(b_i,b_j)]$ and the $b_i$ basis for $V$. $\endgroup$ – janmarqz Nov 20 '14 at 17:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.