Is there a function $\,f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R},\,$ which has a limit at every $x\in\mathbb R$ and is everywhere discontinuous?

Answer. No.

Instead, the following is true: If a function $f:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ has a limit for every $x\in\mathbb R$, then $f$ is discontinuous in a set of points which is at most countable.

More specifically, we have the following facts:

Fact A. If $g(x)=\lim_{y\to x}f(y)$, then $g$ is continuous everywhere.

Fact B. The set $A=\{x: f(x)\ne g(x)\}$ is countable.

Fact C. The function $\,f\,$ is continuous at $\,x=x_0\,$ if and only if $\,f(x_0)=g(x_0)$, and hence $f$ is discontinuous in at most countably many points.

For Fact A, let $x\in\mathbb R$ and $\varepsilon>0$, then there exists a $\delta>0$, such that $$ 0<\lvert y-x\rvert<\delta\quad\Longrightarrow\quad g(x)-\varepsilon<f(y)<g(x)+\varepsilon, $$ but the above inequality implies that for every $z$, with $|z-x|<\delta$, $$ g(x)-\varepsilon \le g(z)=\lim_{y\to z}f(y) \le g(x)+\varepsilon, $$ and hence $g$ is continuous.

For Fact B, define for $\varepsilon>0$ the set $$A_\varepsilon=\{x: \lvert\,f(x)- g(x)\rvert>\varepsilon\}.$$ This set cannot have a limit point, for otherwise, $f$ would not have a limit there. Thus $A_\varepsilon$ is at most countable. Next observe that $$ A=\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb N}A_{1/n}, $$ and hence $A$, the set of discontinuities of $f$, is at most countable.

Fact C is straight-forward.

  • 1
    what a great answer! :) – Ant Oct 18 '14 at 21:58
  • 5
    One wonders what happens if one has a model of set theory such that "a countable union of a countable sets is countable" is false. – Baby Dragon Oct 18 '14 at 21:58
  • 2
    Actually, the proof of this requires the Axiom of Choice, and hence your question is indeed plausible. – Yiorgos S. Smyrlis Oct 18 '14 at 22:03
  • 1
    It doesn't require AC in full; much weaker forms of choice, which you can't do much analysis without, will do. – R.. Oct 19 '14 at 3:04
  • 1
    Since those sets are discrete subsets of a second-countable space, they can be given canonical enumerations. $\:$ (Take a countable basis, and enumerate each set according to the first basic subset whose intersection with the discrete set in exactly the given element.) $\:$ Thus the Axiom of Choice is not needed for the OP. $\;\;\;\;$ – user57159 Oct 19 '14 at 6:13

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.