4
$\begingroup$

Let $U \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$ an open subset and let $f:U\rightarrow \mathbb {R}^2$ is be a continuous function.
I have the following version of Invariance of Domain Theorem (in $\mathbb{R}^2$):
If $f$ is injective then $f$ is homeomorphism.

I need to show:
a) If $f$ is locally injective then $f$ is open map.
b) If there is $a\in U$ such that $f^{-1}(a)$ is discrete subset, and $f$ is locally injective in $U\setminus {a}$, then $f$ is open map.

For (a) I tried: If $f(U)=\emptyset$ then there is nothing to prove. So I took some $y\in f(U)$, $y=f(x)$ for an $x\in U$. then there is an open subset $V\subseteq U$ such that $x\in V$ and $f|_V$ is injective. I tried to look at $\overline V$ and somehow use the invariance of domain theorem above, but I can't figure what to do.
For (b) - I'm lost.

can someone help me?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The thesis of the IDM actually tells you: $f$ is a homeomorphism of $U$ with an open subset of $\mathbb{R}^2$. Does this answer your question? I guess in b you mean $f^{-1}(f(a))$. $\endgroup$ Oct 17 '14 at 19:51
2
$\begingroup$

The full statement of the Invariance of Domain Theorem: if $f$ is injective then $f$ is a homeomorphism between $U$ and the open set $f[U]$. (It also holds for all $n$, not just the planar case $\mathbb{R}^2$ with $n=2$.)

So now your start of the proof can be finished: let $O$ be non-empty open, let $y \in f[O]$, so $y = f(x)$ for some $x \in U$. Then $x$ has a neighbourhood $U$ such that $f$ restricted to $U$ is 1-1. Then $O \cap U$ is also a neighbourhood, $f$ is still 1-1 on it, so the Invariance of Domain (in my statement) shows us that $y \in f[O \cap U] \subset f[O]$, and $f[O \cap U]$ is open, showing that $y$ is an interior point of $f[O]$, as we needed to show.

As to the second part (where I'll assume you mean that $F = f^{-1}[\{f(a)\}]$ is discrete): suppose $O$ is again, non-empty open. If $y = f(x) \in f[O]$, and $y \neq f(a)$, then $x$ misses the discrete set $F$, so a small neighbourhood of $x$ can be chosen that misses $F$ and such that $f$ is injective on it. Apply the IoD theorem again, as above. And if $f(x) = f(a)$, we have a neighbourhood $O$ of $x$ such that $F \cap O = \{x\}$. Then I'd try to show that $f[O]$ is open. But $f$ need not (I think) be 1-1 on a small neighbourhood of $x$, a sone would hope. So some more thought needed there.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.