7
$\begingroup$

Following Urysohn's metrization theorem, I would like to prove or disprove that $\omega_1$ is metrizable. I know it is hausdorff, but I'm not sure whether or not it is second countable, and I'm at loss on how I can prove or disprove it is second countable. And if I'll disprove it, will it tell me that $\omega_1$ is not metrizable, or is Urysohn's theorem only an 'if' and not an 'iff'?

Or perhaps there is a more comfortable-to-use in here theorem to prove/disprove $\omega_1$ being metrizable?

$\endgroup$
9
$\begingroup$

(1) $\omega_1$ is not only Hausdorff, it is normal, as is every linearly ordered set in its order topology.

(2) $\omega_1$ is not second countable, because the intervals $[0,\alpha)$ for $\alpha\lt\omega_1$ are an open cover with no countable subcover.

(3) $\omega_1$ is not separable. Proof: Let S be any countable subset of $\omega_1$. Then $\sup S\lt\omega_1$. Let $\alpha=\sup S$. Then $S$ is a subset of the closed set $[0,\alpha]$, so the closure of $S$ is a subset of $[0,\alpha]$ which is a proper subset of $\omega_1$, so $S$ is not dense in $\omega_1$.

(4) $\omega_1$ is sequentially compact. Proof: Every sequence in $\omega_1$ has a monotonic sequence, which converges.

(5) If a metric space is not separable, then it is not sequentially compact. Proof: Let $X$ be a metric space. If $X$ is not separable, then for some $\varepsilon\gt0$ there is an uncountable set of points such that the distance between any two is at least $\varepsilon$. An infinite sequence of those points can not converge, and it can not have a convergent subsequence. Therefore $X$ is not sequentially compact.

From (3), (4), and (5) it follows that $\omega_1$ is not metrizable. Namely, if $\omega_1$ were metrizable, then, since by (3) it is not separable, it would follow by (5) that it is not sequentially compact, contradicting (4).

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Just a couple of comments. (1) An alternative way of showing that $\omega_1$ is not second-countable is to note that $\{ \alpha+1 \}$ is open in $\omega_1$ for all $\alpha < \omega_1$, and so any base for $\omega_1$ must contain all of these uncountably many singletons. (2) In metrizable spaces the notions of compactness, countable compactness, and sequential compactness are equivalent. (So $\omega_1$ is not metrizable since it is sequentially, and countably, compact, but not compact, or even Lindelöf.) $\endgroup$ – user642796 Oct 17 '14 at 14:31
  • $\begingroup$ @ArthurFischer Thanks for your comments. Also $\omega_1$ is not metrizable because it's not paracompact or even meta-Lindelöf. A subspace $X$ of $\omega_1$ is metrizable if and only if $X$ is a nonstationary subset of $\omega_1$. $\endgroup$ – bof Oct 17 '14 at 21:32
  • $\begingroup$ Hi bof can you guide us with the next please math.stackexchange.com/questions/2440926/… $\endgroup$ – mathd Sep 27 '17 at 4:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.