11
$\begingroup$

Today in highschool we were doing a chapter called "Roots of polynomials" where we learnt something new and interesting which is :

$ax^2+bx+c=0$ Has roots $\alpha$ , $\beta$ Then:

$$\alpha + \beta= -b/a$$

$$\alpha \beta=c/a$$

$ax^3+bx^2+cx+ d=0$ Has roots $\alpha$ , $\beta$ , $\gamma$. Then:

$$\alpha+ \beta + \gamma = -b/a$$

$$\alpha \beta + \alpha \gamma + \beta \gamma= c/a$$

$$\alpha \beta \gamma= -d/a$$

My curiosity turned to, what happens in 4th degree power polynomial. We haven't learnt in class (not in our syllabus). But is there something like a general formula for this? Coz I'm sure people who learn higher powers cannot memorise all the powers and remember when it becomes - or +. (For me I can memorize these because It's only a few set of equations and two different polynomials), what happens in higher powers and how does one memorise ? What is the general formula, if there is any?

And also : what happen in fourth power that is for :

$$ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e=0$$

enter image description here

After looking at the first comment I understood that it's Vietas formulas. And I checked in out in Wikipedia. The formulas are complicated looking, but I understood after looking for a while. But there are dots in the middle which means more equations. I tried this with my 3rd power and it works fine, but the question remains "How to do for higher degree polynomials. I don't know what are the formulas in the middle (the dots going downwards in the middle). I believe there are n number of formulas for n powers, here there is only three. Which I already knew, please help me

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ You are looking for Vieta's formulas. Just look that up on wikipedia! $\endgroup$ – Parth Thakkar Oct 14 '14 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ @ParthThakkar , thank you :) Wait let me update my question, coz there is a problem with Wikipedia that I have. $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 13:23
  • $\begingroup$ There is nothing really to memorize: see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vieta's_formulas#Proof. $\endgroup$ – lhf Oct 14 '14 at 13:27
  • $\begingroup$ @ParthThakkar I updated my question :) Please take a look :) $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 13:38
  • $\begingroup$ @lhf , I updated my question :) Please take a look :) New content is at the bottom :) $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 13:40
3
$\begingroup$

I'll give examples, then you'll understand the general pattern better.

Take a degree four polynomial. I'll denote a general fourth-degree polynomial by $P_4$. A general $5^{\text{th}}$ degree polynomial as $P_5$ and so on...

Your $P_4$ is: $ a_0x^4 + a_1x^3 + a_2x^2 + a_3x^1 + a_4$

Then, I'll get $4$ formulas:

  1. $r_0 + r_1 + r_2 + r_3 = -\dfrac{a_1}{a_0}$

  2. $r_0r_1 + r_0r_2 + r_0r_3 + r_1r_2 + r_1r_3 + r_2r_3 = +\dfrac{a_2}{a_0}$

  3. $r_0r_1r_2 + r_0r_1r_3 + r_0r_2r_3 + r_1r_2r_3= -\dfrac{a_3}{a_0}$

  4. $ r_0r_1r_2r_3 = + \dfrac{a_4}{a_0}$

The idea is, first you add products of single roots. That is, the first formula. Then, you add products containing 2 roots - second formula. Then you add products containing 3 roots - third formula. Then add products of 4 roots - fourth formula. And on the RHS, the denominator is always the coeffecient of the heighest power, and the signs alternate. The first formula always has the negative sign. The numerator is the coefficient matching with the numbers of roots in the multiplication, i. e. for product containing 4 roots, numerator should be A4.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much Parth Thakkar, I think there is a typo where you said, add "products of single roots" ? $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 14:24
  • $\begingroup$ @XNova That is not a typo. $\endgroup$ – MJD Oct 14 '14 at 14:28
  • $\begingroup$ @MJD , understood :) $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 14:38
  • $\begingroup$ @XNova, btw, writing all this down was particularly messy. I ended up writing formulas for $5$ roots :P. That means, $10$ terms in second and third formulas!!! $\endgroup$ – Parth Thakkar Oct 14 '14 at 14:42
  • $\begingroup$ @ParthThakkar , yes I understand :) thank you very much :) $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 14:45
2
$\begingroup$

As the comments say, these are called Vieta's formulas, and the plus or minus sign is not difficult to remember, because it always alternates. In general, if you have an $n$th-degree polynomial $$p(x) = a_0x^n + a_{1}x^{n-1} + a_2x^{n-2} + \cdots + a_{n-1}x + a_n$$ whose roots are $r_1, r_2, \ldots r_n$ then Vieta's formulas tell you that you can find $\frac{a_i}{ a_0}$ as follows:

Take all possible products of $i$ of the roots together; add up those products, and finally multiply by $-1$ if $i$ is odd.

For example, suppose $n=6$ and we want to find $\frac{a_3}{a_0}$, the coefficient of the $x^3$ term. (Here we have $i=3$.) Say the roots are $r_1\ldots r_6$. We find the products of the roots in groups of three: $$\begin{array}{cccc} r_1r_2r_3 + & r_1r_2r_4 +& r_1r_2r_5 +& r_1r_2r_6 +\\ r_1r_3r_4 + & r_1r_3r_5 +& r_1r_3r_6 +& r_1r_4r_5 +\\ r_1r_4r_6 + & r_1r_5r_6 +& r_2r_3r_4 +& r_2r_3r_5 +\\ r_2r_3r_6 + & r_2r_4r_5 +& r_2r_4r_6 +& r_2r_5r_6 +\\ r_3r_4r_5 + & r_3r_4r_6 +& r_3r_5r_6 +& r_4r_5r_6 \hphantom{=} \end{array}$$

There are 20 of these products, and we add up all 20. Then, because 3 is odd, we multiply by $-1$, and we have $\frac{a_3}{a_0}$.

(You may be interested to observe that this works even for $i=0$, if you understand the empty product correctly; this and similar considerations are what leads mathematicians to understand empty products the way they do.)

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank You. Im trying to grasp it :) Give me some seconds. $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 13:46
  • $\begingroup$ I have a few questions :) I don't understand what you mean by: Take all the possible products of $i$ . What is i? I thought i is just a number you used to denote $a_i$ where i is from 0 to n in this case. What does products of i mean? :) And also I realized that you have taken all the three pairs and multiplied and then if it's odd we should multiply by -1. What about product of all the possible 4 pairs? Is it only 3 pairs we take? (Just like in 3rd power)? $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ It's not “take all the possible products of $i$”. It's “take all the possible products of ($i$ of the roots together)”, just like in the example, where we take all possible products of three of the roots together, because we are looking for $a_3$. $\endgroup$ – MJD Oct 14 '14 at 13:57
  • $\begingroup$ Im sorry I don't understand this answer well :/ I think its because Im only a high school student. I upvoted :) because I have an instinct that this answer will be really useful for other students who has a better knowledge than me. Thank you very much. $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 14:20
  • $\begingroup$ we are speaking English :) don't say sorry :) im sure this answer will be most appreciated by others. $\endgroup$ – user170349 Oct 14 '14 at 14:25
1
$\begingroup$

For the fourth power

$$ax^4+bx^3+cx^2+dx+e=0$$ has roots $\alpha$ , $\beta$ , $\gamma$ , $\delta$

Then :

$$ \begin{align} \alpha+\beta+\gamma+\delta & = -\frac ba \\ \alpha\beta + \alpha\gamma + \alpha\delta + \beta\gamma + \beta\delta+\gamma\delta & = \hphantom{-}\frac ca \\ \alpha\beta\gamma + \alpha\beta\delta + \alpha\gamma\delta + \beta\gamma\delta & = -\frac da \\ \alpha\beta\gamma\delta & = \hphantom{-}\frac ea \end{align} $$

(original screenshot)

The way I remember this is you start with the additonal of individual roots (which is - sign) and then you go +,-,+ alternatively. After adding single roots (all the combinations) then you go onto double roots (take the sum of the double root possibilites).

And so on, until when you reached your nth formula of your nth power polynomial (with n powers) . So you have n pair of possibilities to sum, and so obviously there is only one term (all n roots multiplied).

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ clearly written. With simple use of latex type formatting, the answer is more beautiful with the alignment... Thanks $\endgroup$ – mtk Sep 5 '16 at 13:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy