1
$\begingroup$

Find a basis of the transformations such that the $\mathcal{B}$-matrix is diagonal.

  1. Orthogonal projection $T$ onto the plane $3x_1+x_2+2x_3=0$ in $\mathbb{R^3}$.

  2. Reflection $T$ about the plane $x_1+2x_2+x_3=0$ in $\mathbb{R^3}$.

In both cases, the $\mathcal{B}$-matrix will be diagonal iff $T(v_i)=kv_i$ for all vectors $v_i$ in the basis.

For number 1, we know the plane is defined by $\left( \begin{array}{ccc}3 \\ 1\\2 \end{array} \right)$, and we choose our basis to be three vectors $v1 = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}3\\1\\2 \end{array} \right), v_2 = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}2\\0\\-3 \end{array} \right), v_3 = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}1\\-3\\0 \end{array} \right)$ so that $v_2$ and $v_3$ are perpendicular to $v_1$. Then we have $T(v_1) = v_1$, but I'm not sure how to calculate $T(v_2)$ and $T(v_3)$.

For number 2, we know the plane is defined by $\left( \begin{array}{ccc}1\\2\\1 \end{array} \right)$ and we again consider three vectors $v1 = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}1\\2\\1 \end{array} \right), v_2 = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}1\\0\\-1 \end{array} \right), v_3 = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}2\\-1\\0 \end{array} \right)$ so that $v_1$ is parallel to the plane and $v_2,v_3$ are perpendicular to the plane. In this case, I know $T(v_1)=v_1$, but again I'm not sure how to calculate $T(v_2)$ and $T(v_3)$.

In either case, is my initial work a correct procedure? Also, how do we calculate $T(v_2)$ and $T(v_3)$ in either case for $\mathbb{R^3}$. It doesn't seem so clear to see this geometrically as it is in $\mathbb{R^2}$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

For 1: $v_2$ and $v_3$ are constructed to be in the plane under question. Thus, the projection leaves these vectors as they are, $T(v_2)=v_2$ and $T(v_3)=v_3$. (Expanded: These vectors are already in the plane on which $T$ projects. The projection onto a plane takes vectors outside the plane and throws them onto the plane. If such a vector is already on a plane, then the projection does nothing.)

Moreover, $v_1$ is the direction normal to the plane, hence $T(v_1)=0$.

For 2: With similar considerations, one finds $T(v_1)=-v_1$, $T(v_2)=v_2$ and $T(v_3)=v_3$.

(Expanded: Reflection changes the direction of incoming rays. If the ray is perpendicular to the plane (or the mirror) it gets thrown back and its direction changes: $T(v_1)=-v_1$.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please elaborate? I'm trying to imagine these geometrically and I'm failing to see what you describe. For the first one, I understand why $T(v_1)=0$, but I don't understand why $T(v_2)=v_2$ and $T(v_3)=v_3$. Also for the second one, why is $T(v_1)=-v_1$? Why is it not $T(v_1)=v_1$ if we're just reflecting the plane on itself (thus keeping it the same)? And I honestly don't understand the $T(v_2)$ nor $T(v_3)$ here either. $\endgroup$ – Joel B Oct 14 '14 at 10:14
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, I'm not sure I understand why $T(v_1)=0$. Isn't the orthogonal of something onto itself just that something? $\endgroup$ – Joel B Oct 14 '14 at 10:29
  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projection_%28linear_algebra%29 $\endgroup$ – daw Oct 14 '14 at 11:10
  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflection_%28mathematics%29 $\endgroup$ – daw Oct 14 '14 at 11:11
  • $\begingroup$ Can you explain why $v_1$ is perpendicular to the plane in both cases? I thought $v_1$ was parallel to the planes. Similarly, why are $v_2,v_3$ parallel to the plane? $\endgroup$ – Joel B Oct 15 '14 at 8:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.