4
$\begingroup$

Note: I will concatenate paths from left to right.

If $X$ is a path-connected topological space, and $p, q\in X$ are distinct, then any path $\gamma$ between $p$ and $q$ induces an isomorphism between $\pi_1(X, p)$ and $\pi_1(X, q)$, where a loop $\alpha$ based at $p$ is send to the loop $\gamma^{-1}\alpha\gamma$, which is based at $q$. If $\delta$ is another path between $p$ and $q$, then $\gamma$ and $\delta$ would induce the same isomorphism iff $\gamma^{-1}\alpha\gamma$ is homotopic (as a loops with fixed base point $q$) to $\delta^{-1}\alpha\delta$ for all $\alpha$, since these would then be in the same equivalence class and thus equal in $\pi_1(X, q)$. This would only seem to hold if every loop from $p$ to $q$ and then back to $p$ in the reverse direction (i.e., all paths of the form $\gamma^{-1}\gamma$ are homotopic.

Now, this condition is enough to answer the question, but I was wondering if it was equivalent to some simpler condition. I guess it's equivalent to all paths from $p$ to $q$ being homotopic to each other (while fixing $p$ and $q$). Is there a name for this condition?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ If and only if $\pi_1(X)$ is abelian. $\endgroup$ – Orest Bucicovschi Oct 13 '14 at 16:41
  • $\begingroup$ ^Why is that equivalent to any two paths between two points being homotopic? $\endgroup$ – Nishant Oct 13 '14 at 16:42
  • $\begingroup$ Proving what @orangeskid just said is a classic exercise in algebraic topology... you should try to prove it! $\endgroup$ – Mike Earnest Oct 13 '14 at 16:43
  • $\begingroup$ Okay! I'll get to it. $\endgroup$ – Nishant Oct 13 '14 at 16:43
  • $\begingroup$ Wait, is my conclusion that any two paths between $p$ and $q$ are homotopic incorrect? Because $S^1$ has the abelian group $\mathbb Z$ as its fundamental group, but two paths between $p$ and $q$ don't seem to be homotopic if they go around the circle a different number of times. $\endgroup$ – Nishant Oct 13 '14 at 16:51
3
$\begingroup$

It is equivalent to a simpler condition, but not quite the one you're thinking. Suppose you have two paths $\gamma_1, \gamma_2$ from $p$ to $q$. They induce isomorphisms $\phi_1, \phi_2$. Then the automorphism of $\pi_1(X,p)$ $\phi_2 \circ \phi_1^{-1}$ is just the inner automorphism given by conjugation by the loop $\gamma_1 \gamma_2^{-1}$. Note that any element of $\pi_1(X,p)$ can be realized as such a pair of loops (I leave this tothe reader). So for all isomorphisms to be the same, all inner automorphism of $\pi_1(X,p)$ must be trivial, which is precisely when $\pi_1(X,p)$ is abelian.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

One might as well state the algebraic result (as in Topology and Groupoids):

6.3.2 Let $x, x ′$ belong to the same component of the groupoid $G$. Then $a_*=b_*: G(x) \to G(x ′ )$ for all $a, b : x → x ′$ if and only if $G(x)$ is abelian.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JHance: I've long accepted a maxim of Philip Hall which I learned from Philip Higgins that one should look for the algebra which models the geometry, and not try to force the geometry unnecessarily into an already given framework. I argue that 1-dimensional homotopy theory is better modelled by groupoids rather than by groups. $\endgroup$ – Ronnie Brown Oct 13 '14 at 21:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.