2
$\begingroup$

I just finished intermediate algebra in college. I liked it and breezed through it. I feel like at this level of math I can only expect dull and unenthusiastic teachers (which has been the case throughout my entire school career). I want to get to a level where my interest in math allows me to connect with other enthusiastic and passionate individuals. I've started self-studying precalc. In the process I have come up with several serious questions:

1) Is precalc worth self-studying if I'm just going to take the course in a couple months?

2) Should I just keep studying it and branch out into higher levels of math purely out of interest and disregard the slow pace of school?

3) How do I stay motivated in order to get to the more commendable levels of math? (all my friends have completed calculus or higher so I feel kind of stupid trying to pursue something I'm already far behind in, which is very discouraging.)

Ask questions if you'd like clarity. I would really appreciate some answers because I'm a real noob at this. I don't even know whether precalc is a good start either. I just picked it up because it is literally pre-calculus and I thought it might be necessary for calculus.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ one good reason to self-study prior to taking a course, is that you can turn what may have been a challenging course into a free A+. I knew all of my freshman calculus before I even stepped into the classroom. $\endgroup$
    – John Joy
    Commented Oct 11, 2014 at 1:46

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

I want to get to a level where my interest in math allows me to connect with other enthusiastic and passionate individuals.

  • If you're starting self-study of precalculus, you already have a good level of interest.
  • Ask questions here. This community is enthusiastic and passionate.

To your specific questions:

  1. Sure. Why not?
  2. Sure. Why not?
  3. Look at your progress, not your friends'.
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I always prefer to have some exposure to material before I take a math class. For me, part of learning math is putting the ideas in my brain then letting them simmer for a while. The longer I give myself to do this, the more densely interconnected the ideas have the opportunity to become.

Plus, if you've already grappled with the surface questions of a subject then you can spend the semester mulling over the subtleties instead.

I can't comment on what pace is "best," but I'll say this: I go on occasional benders of trying to push myself forward as far as I can manage, if only to identify what concepts I need to strengthen before I can approach newer ideas. The deeper I go in math, the more enjoyment I get from connecting ideas that I originally didn't realize were connected...but in math, it turns out that lots and lots of the ideas are.

For me, motivation comes from having unanswered questions, but everyone will have different opinions on what kind of unanswered questions are even interesting. At your level, though, a book on discrete mathematics might make for enlightening reading. It's the kind of math that you can count, you can write down...meaning it's not terribly abstract, so you can really grapple with the ideas without them feeling vague.

A few years back, I spent the summer reading the chapters of a discrete math book (Gossett, Discrete Mathematics with Proof) that hadn't been covered in my discrete math class the previous semester, then I studied through a another discrete math text (Kolman, Busby, Ross, Discrete Mathematical Structures) that had some chapters with introduction to groups (which are something discussed in abstract algebra), and that gave me the confidence to start reading an abstract algebra book (Pinter, A Book of Abstract Algebra) that I had picked up. For me, the ideas of abstract algebra give me a lot of motivation, because the concepts of homomorphism and isomorphism are the sort of thing that start to show up all over the place, when you're looking for them...and that's the sort of thing that makes me enjoy math: Recognizing ideas in places where I didn't know the idea would be lurking. Once I had those concepts of homomorphism and isomorphism in my head, I studied through my linear algebra book (Anton, Rorres, Elemnetary Linear Algebra) again, this time feeling like I was getting a much more meaningful story. And this left me feeling prepared to read through a book on applied analysis (Holland, Applied Analysis by the Hilbert Space Method), which is the sort of math that really keeps me engaged with the subject. (I'm looking to do mathematical physics in grad school and beyond...so if your interests with math are up a different avenue, your path may be substantially different.)

Neither discrete math nor introductory linear algebra require calculus per se, although calculus ideas tend to pop up in the textbooks (but often as optional sections). What might make linear algebra difficult at your level may be the tendency to only think of the geometric interpretation of linear algebra. (It is, after all, the math used to do 3D video game engines and whatnot.) But it's the abstract side of linear algebra that makes it such a compelling subject, like what happens when you say to yourself, "I need to stop thinking about vectors as 'pointing in a direction' and 'having a length' and all that, and ask why it is that the math works when I take a group of functions and call them vectors, then interpret the concepts like orthogonality and projections." It was these sort of questions that, for me, really started to raise deeper questions and provoke a deeper interest in the subject.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .