I'm having trouble understanding a remark in Hartshorne: Let $X$ be the nonsingular projective cubic defined by $y^2z = x^3 - xz^2$ and put $P_0 = (0,1,0)$. The claim is that $\mathscr{L}(P_0)$ is not very ample because it is not generated by its global sections, and that this in turn is because $X$ is not rational, so $P_0$ cannot be equivalent to another point of $X$.

But why would $\mathscr{L}(P_0)$ being generated by its global sections imply $P_0$ is equivalent to another point? This is not clear to me. A less precise question: to what extent does this remark apply to $\mathscr{L}(P)$ for other points $P \in X$, or even other nonsingular projective curves of positive genus?

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Take a global section with a pole at $P_0$, say $f$. Since $X$ is nonsingular projective the divisor $(f)$ must have exactly one zero somewhere since the degree of $(f)$ is zero, say $Q$. By definition of linear equivalence $Q-P_0 = (f) \sim 0$, so $Q\sim P_0$. $\endgroup$
    – Matt
    Commented Dec 31, 2011 at 22:55
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Matt! It did not occur to me that there must be a global section with a pole at $P_0$. Even after you said this I had to think about it... $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 1, 2012 at 1:20

1 Answer 1


Let $f$ be a global section of the sheaf with a pole at $P_0$. We now consider the divisor $(f)$. Since $X$ is a nonsingular projective curve the divisor has degree $0$ which means that there is exactly one zero somewhere else. Call this point $Q$. Now we see that $Q-P_0 = (f)\sim 0$, so $Q\sim P_0$.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .