1
$\begingroup$

I have read a book called "Proofs From The Book", but it defined many terms and contains much terminology, so I couldn't understand how to obtain a proof by using Bricard's condition. However, I couldn't understand the proof of Bricard's condition either, so I have no hope to understand the formal proof, hope you could give me the intuition behind the proof.

Thanks in advance!

P.S. And how do we define split of tetrahedra?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I imagine if there was intuition behind any of Hilbert's problems, they wouldn't be as infamous as they are! $\endgroup$ – Adam Dec 31 '11 at 19:47
4
$\begingroup$

Bricard proved a special case of scissors congruence: Any two polyhedra that are mirror images of one another are scissors congruent. And along the way, he discovered a precursor to the Dehn invariant. There is intuition behind the Dehn invariant, essentially relying on a distinction between dihedral angles that are rational multiples of $\pi$ and those that are not. The cube is not scissors congruent to the regular tetraheron basically because the latter has irrational (multiples of $\pi$) dihedral angles while the cube has rational dihedral angles, $\frac{1}{2}\pi$. Of course, there is much more, but this is somehow the essence.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.