24
$\begingroup$

I was asked to find out the simplicial homology groups of the torus $T=S^1\times{}S^1$ embedded in $R^3$. I triangulated the torus like this :

This was my first try

Here the $0$-simplices are $\{v_0\}$. $1$-simplices are $\{a,b,c\}$ and the $2$-simplices are $\{D_1,D_2\}$. And I found out the homology groups : $H_0(T)=\mathbb{Z}, H_1(T)=\mathbb{Z}^2,H_2(T)=\mathbb{Z}$

But my teacher said it was wrong, because the triangulation is not correct. According to her it should be:

Correct triangulation

I don't understand what is wrong with my triangulation of the torus $T$. Can someone please clarify this to me? Thanks! (Excuse the crude pictures!)

$\endgroup$
3
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Your triangulation is actually a pseudo triangulation. Namely, you identify vertices of the same triangle. So you're not dealing with a simplicial complex at the end, but with a CW-complex (which is fine by the way if you know about cellular homology). $\endgroup$
    – Pece
    Oct 1 '14 at 5:19
  • $\begingroup$ @Pece So I cannot have a $1$-simplex attached to the same $0$-simplex? i.e. "loops" are not allowed in simplicial triangulation? $\endgroup$
    – ChesterX
    Oct 1 '14 at 6:05
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It depends on what you call a triangulation. Judging by the answer of your teacher, it's probably a simplicial complex, in which case all the faces of a simplex are required to be different (simply because if a simplex is embedded in a real vector space, all its faces are different). $\endgroup$ Oct 1 '14 at 6:27
13
$\begingroup$

As said by @Pece, your computation is correct, because homology can be computed with quite general kinds of complexes.

But it sounds like your teacher wants you to understand the definition of a simplicial complex, and is probably using a definition of a triangulation which requires it to be a simplicial complex.

In a simplicial complex, every simplex is required to be embedded, but none of your 1-simplices $a$, $b$, and $c$ are embedded, because each has its two endpoints attached to the same $0$-simplex $v_0$.

Also, the intersection of any pair of simplices is required to be a simplex, but your 2-simplices $D_1,D_2$ intersect in $a \cup b \cup c$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Now I see where I went wrong : I completely overlooked the fact about the intersection! Also can you please elaborate what you meant by "every simplex is required to be embedded"? $\endgroup$
    – ChesterX
    Oct 1 '14 at 16:17
  • $\begingroup$ @ChesterX: Each $k$-simplex in a simplicial complex $X$ may be regarded as the image of a continuous map $\Delta^k \to X$, where $\Delta^k$ denotes the "standard" $k$-simplex in $\mathbb{R}^{k+1}$, and this continuous map is required to be an injection, i.e. an embedding. Notice that in the concept of a "pseudo triangulation" mentioned in the comment of Pece, the requirement of injection is weakened. $\endgroup$
    – Lee Mosher
    Oct 1 '14 at 16:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.