Let $R$ be a commutative ring.
My definition for the determinant over $M_n(R)$ is defined inductively as $\det_{n+1}(A)=\sum_{j=1}^n (-1)^{1+j}A_{1j} \det_n(\tilde{A_{ij}})$.
(Here, $(-1)$ denotes its sign, it does not mean the additive inverse of a unity)
($\tilde{A_{ij}}$ is given by removing $i$-th row and $j$-th column of $A$)
With this definition, I have proved the following:
Let $A\in M_n(R)$
Then, $\forall x\in R$, $\det(xA)=x^n \sum_{\sigma\in S_n} \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)\prod_{i=1}^n A_{i,\sigma(i)}$.
However, I want to show that $\det(A)$ is exactly $\sum_{\sigma\in S_n} \operatorname{sgn}(\sigma)\prod_{i=1}^n A_{i,\sigma(i)}$. (I think this is true)
If $R$ has a unity, then this is trivial. However, if it does not contain a unity, how do I show this?