0
$\begingroup$

Suppose we want to find the electrostatic potential $\phi$(r) inside of some volume $V$ with known boundary conditions. The physical field configuration should minimize the electrostatic potential energy function, which is defined as

$U[\phi] = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \int_v ( \nabla \phi)^2$d r

Show that requiring $\phi$ to be a stationary point of $U$ is equivalent to Laplace's equation, $\nabla^2\phi = 0$.

A hint I was given: take a small deformation of $\phi$, that is $\phi + \delta\phi$, such that $\delta\phi$ vanishes on the boundary of V. We must show that $\delta U = U[\phi + \delta\phi] - U[\phi] = 0$, to linear order in $\delta\phi$.

I have tried limits from first principles and first order taylor expansions. I always seem to just move in a loop however, constantly reaching no conclusion. If anyone is able to show me how this can be done, that would be fantastic.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\angles}[1]{\left\langle\, #1 \,\right\rangle} \newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace\, #1 \,\right\rbrace} \newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack\, #1 \,\right\rbrack} \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\,\left\lceil\, #1 \,\right\rceil\,} \newcommand{\dd}{{\rm d}} \newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}} \newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,{\rm e}^{#1}\,} \newcommand{\fermi}{\,{\rm f}} \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\,\left\lfloor #1 \right\rfloor\,} \newcommand{\half}{{1 \over 2}} \newcommand{\ic}{{\rm i}} \newcommand{\iff}{\Longleftrightarrow} \newcommand{\imp}{\Longrightarrow} \newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left(\, #1 \,\right)} \newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\pp}{{\cal P}} \newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\vphantom{\large A}\,#2\,}\,} \newcommand{\sech}{\,{\rm sech}} \newcommand{\sgn}{\,{\rm sgn}} \newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{{\rm d}^{#1} #2}{{\rm d} #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\ul}[1]{\underline{#1}} \newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\, #1 \,\right\vert}$ \begin{align} \verts{\nabla\pars{\phi + \delta\phi}}^{2} - \verts{\nabla\phi}^{2} &=\pars{\nabla\phi + \nabla\delta\phi}\cdot\pars{\nabla\phi + \nabla\delta\phi} -\pars{\nabla\phi}^{2} \\[5mm]&=2\nabla\phi\cdot\nabla\delta\phi + \pars{\nabla\delta\phi}^{2} \end{align}

Up to $\ds{\delta\phi^{2}}$, it becomes $\ds{2\nabla\cdot\pars{\delta\phi\nabla\phi} - 2\delta\phi\nabla\cdot\nabla\phi =2\nabla\cdot\pars{\delta\phi\,\nabla\phi} - 2\delta\phi\,\nabla^{2}\phi}$

Then, $$ 0=\delta{\rm U}=\int\bracks{2\nabla\cdot\pars{\delta\phi\,\nabla\phi} - 2\delta\phi\,\nabla^{2}\phi}\,\dd{\bf r} =2\int_{S}\delta\phi\,\nabla\phi\cdot\dd\vec{\rm S} -2\int\delta\phi\,\nabla^{2}\phi\ \dd{\bf r} $$

For 'arbitrary variations' $\ds{\delta\phi}$, it leads to $\ds{\color{#66f}{\large\nabla^{2}\phi = 0}}$ provided $\ds{\int_{S}\delta\phi\,\nabla\phi\cdot\dd\vec{\rm S}}$ vanishes out.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.