We have to prove the following identity:

$$z_1 \bar{z_2} = \frac{1}{4}(|z_1 + z_2|^2 + i|z_1 + iz_2|^2 - |z_1 - z_2|^2 - i|z_1 - iz_2|^2)$$

It says to use the identity we just proved, which is $\Re(z_1 \bar{z_2}) = \frac{1}{4}(|z_1 + z_2|^2 - |z_1 - z_2|^2)$

I get that we consider the identity we have proven with $\bar{z_2}$ and also with substituting $\bar z_2 \to i \bar z_2$. We also use the fact that $z = \Re(z) + i \Im(z)$, but I'm confused to the signs: Since $\Re(iz) = - \Im (z)$, shouldn't the terms multiplied by $i$ have the opposite sign than they do in the identity?

  • $\begingroup$ Here since modulus is taken. Sign does not matter actually. $\endgroup$ – Ri-Li Sep 23 '14 at 18:35
  • $\begingroup$ That's just $\Re(z_1 \bar z_2) + i \Re(z_1 \bar z_2)$..? $\endgroup$ – MCT Sep 23 '14 at 18:36
  • $\begingroup$ No $\Re (z_1\bar z_2) + i \Im (z_1\bar z_2)$ $\endgroup$ – Ri-Li Sep 23 '14 at 18:42
  • $\begingroup$ The sign does matter since I'm talking about the sign outside of the modulus brackets. And placing an "i" outside of the real part of a number does not magically make that real part the imaginary part. ex $z = x+iy$, you gave me $x+ix$ not $x+iy$. $\endgroup$ – MCT Sep 23 '14 at 18:45

Note that


So the identity in your question is actually correct.

  • $\begingroup$ Oh right, I didn't account for the fact that all of $iz_2$ was under the bar sign. Thanks. +1 $\endgroup$ – MCT Sep 23 '14 at 18:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.