80
$\begingroup$

Two events are mutually exclusive if they can't both happen.

Independent events are events where knowledge of the probability of one doesn't change the probability of the other.

Are these definitions correct? If possible, please give more than one example and counterexample.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ They are, in a sense, completely opposite features. If $A$ and $B$ are independent, knowledge that $A$ occurred does not change the probabilities that $B$ may have occurred. Where as if $A$ and $B$ are disjoint, knowledge that $A$ occurred completely changes the probabilities that $B$ may have occurred by collapsing them to $0$. $\endgroup$ – alex.jordan Feb 2 '16 at 22:56
  • $\begingroup$ I just noticed that the definitions in this question look like they've been taken from my answer here. (Not that I mind or anything.) $\endgroup$ – Oscar Cunningham Feb 19 '16 at 9:50
  • $\begingroup$ Consider taking out a card from a deck of $52$ playing cards. $S$: The card is a spade. $A$: The card is an ace. The two events are not mutually exclusive as there exists an Ace of Spades. $P(A) = \frac{4}{52}$ and $P(S) = \frac{1}{4}$. and $P(A\cap S) = \frac{1}{52} = \frac{4}{52} \frac{1}{4} = P(A) P(S)$ $\endgroup$ – dark32 Mar 19 '17 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ @alex.jordan If you wanted to highlight the analogy, you could say that independence and mutual exclusivity were defined by $P(AB)=P(A)P(B)$ and $P(A+B)=P(A)+P(B)$ respectively. $\endgroup$ – Oscar Cunningham Apr 11 '17 at 18:21
  • $\begingroup$ The book Counterexamples in Probability (Third Edition) by J. M. Stoyanov (Dover, 2013) is a treasure trove of information. In particular, Section 3 of Chapter 1 explores INDEPENDENCE OF RANDOM EVENTS. $\endgroup$ – PolyaPal Nov 28 '17 at 18:07
82
$\begingroup$

Yes, that's fine.

Events are mutually exclusive if the occurrence of one event excludes the occurrence of the other(s). Mutually exclusive events cannot happen at the same time. For example: when tossing a coin, the result can either be heads or tails but cannot be both.

$$\left.\begin{align}P(A\cap B) &= 0 \\ P(A\cup B) &= P(A)+P(B)\\ P(A\mid B)&=0 \\ P(A\mid \neg B) &= \frac{P(A)}{1-P(B)}\end{align}\right\}\text{ mutually exclusive }A,B$$

Events are independent if the occurrence of one event does not influence (and is not influenced by) the occurrence of the other(s). For example: when tossing two coins, the result of one flip does not affect the result of the other.

$$\left.\begin{align}P(A\cap B) &= P(A)P(B) \\ P(A\cup B) &= P(A)+P(B)-P(A)P(B)\\ P(A\mid B)&=P(A) \\ P(A\mid \neg B) &= P(A)\end{align}\right\}\text{ independent }A,B$$

This of course means mutually exclusive events are not independent, and independent events cannot be mutually exclusive. (Events of measure zero excepted.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ can i get a real life example for better understanding. take a look i have edited Question and made it more clear. $\endgroup$ – Adnan Ali Sep 22 '14 at 5:48
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ "This of course means..." Events of probability zero excluded. $\endgroup$ – Did Sep 22 '14 at 6:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is there any connection between independent events and mutually exclusive events? I meant to ask "If $A$ and $B$ are mutually exclusive, what can be commented on the independence of $A$ and $B$ or vice versa." Or is there no such connection at all? I guess there is none. But just want to confirm. $\endgroup$ – anir123 May 23 '15 at 15:22
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @Mahesha999 If two events are mutually exclusive, then they are NOT independent. $\endgroup$ – Pramod Jun 24 '15 at 1:11
  • $\begingroup$ I think the hint is, in Independent events, there are usually two or more events involved considered as a whole. $\endgroup$ – Anwar Feb 9 '17 at 5:10
14
$\begingroup$

Mutually exclusive event :- two events are mutually exclusive event when they cannot occur at the same time. e.g if we flip a coin it can only show a head OR a tail, not both.

Independent event :- the occurrence of one event does not affect the occurrence of the others e.g if we flip a coin two times, the first time may show a head, but this does not guarantee that the next time when we flip the coin the outcome will also be heads. From this example we can see the first event does not affect the occurrence of the next event.

$\endgroup$
12
$\begingroup$

After reading the answers above I still could not understand clearly the difference between mutually exclusive AND independent events. I found a nice answer from Dr. Pete posted on math forum. So I attach it here so that op and many other confused guys like me could save some of their time.

If two events A and B are independent a real-life example is the following. Consider a fair coin and a fair six-sided die. Let event A be obtaining heads, and event B be rolling a 6. Then we can reasonably assume that events A and B are independent, because the outcome of one does not affect the outcome of the other. The probability that both A and B occur is

P(A and B) = P(A)P(B) = (1/2)(1/6) = 1/12.

An example of a mutually exclusive event is the following. Consider a fair six-sided die as before, only in addition to the numbers 1 through 6 on each face, we have the property that the even-numbered faces are colored red, and the odd-numbered faces are colored green. Let event A be rolling a green face, and event B be rolling a 6. Then

P(B) = 1/6

P(A) = 1/2

as in our previous example. But it is obvious that events A and B cannot simultaneously occur, since rolling a 6 means the face is red, and rolling a green face means the number showing is odd. Therefore

P(A and B) = 0.

Therefore, we see that a mutually exclusive pair of nontrivial events are also necessarily dependent events. This makes sense because if A and B are mutually exclusive, then if A occurs, then B cannot also occur; and vice versa. This stands in contrast to saying the outcome of A does not affect the outcome of B, which is independence of events.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

If I toss a coin twice, the result of the first toss and the second toss are independent.

However the event that you get two heads is mutually exclusive to the event that you get two tails.

Suppose two events have a non-zero chance of occurring.

Then if the two events are mutually exclusive, they can not be independent.

If two events are independent, they cannot be mutually exclusive.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Aren't the last two sentences saying the exact same thing? $\endgroup$ – Mr Reality Dec 4 '17 at 15:44
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, just for emphasis. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Dec 4 '17 at 15:54
1
$\begingroup$

Think simple,for independents events we have two events (two different events like tossing coin and rolling a disc,tossing two coins).So,probability of occurence of one does not effect the probability of occurence of other.In case of mutually exclusive events we have also two evevts(may be more than two) but difference is that the events are derived from the same events (rolling dices with even number red coloured and odd number green coloured.here both events have from the only single dice not for two).

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Answers have been useful. You have learnt it.

I am just sharing my learning here, just because the discussion help us solidify our understanding. Usually we talk about coins, dies in terms of trying to either understand or explain probabilistic events. If I don't use certain concepts for a while, I forget them. Then I hit another subject, module say biology where Mendelian inheritance (genetics) actually incorporate probability, specifically independent events and mutually exclusive events.

It was quite interesting and let me revise my own concept gaps. I hope this will let you think from another application point of view.

Product rule applies to independent events. You can be tall regardless of your skin colour. You can be fair regardless of your height. So you can be tall and fair at the same time, (no offence to anyone, just taking the dominant traits here) These are two independent events, that can come about together.

Another way, you like to swim, your brother/sister likes to play rugby. Both of you could be Olympians, racing in your competitions at the same time and taking two medals away together. You can't swim in a rugby ground, so you will not influence his medal in anyway, so is he.

You like to play the piano, your friend likes to play the violin. Both of you can play together and conduct a concert or an orchestra (if you may). You don't influence each other in anyway.

Thus, swim AND rugby taking place = p(swim) * p(rugby)

Sum rule applies to mutually exclusive events. Imagine, only one swimmer will be chosen from the country to represent in Olympics for 100m freestyle. Lets say you are from Australia, and coaches must select one person for the team. One person, either you or Kyle Chalmers.

In this case if you are selected, Kyle can't and vice versa. Both of you can't swim at the same time.

Thus probability of you OR Kyle swimming in Olympics = p(you) + p(Kyle)

Coming back to the genetics simple example for mutual exclusiveness, you can either be tall or short, fair or dark.

Maths is life, explains physics, chemistry, biology, and what not. So Good luck!

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Events are Independent when happening of one does not influence happening of other. Eruption of volcano on Earth and orbit of Mars do not influence each other, so are independent events.

Growth of human population and preservation of many other species are mutually exclusive, as the one can only happen if the other does not happen.

Strictly speaking, mutually exclusive does not imply that one of them must happen. If there is a large asteroid impact on Earth, then neither human population grows nor endangered species are preserved.

$\endgroup$

protected by Jyrki Lahtonen Aug 21 '15 at 19:10

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.