$\phi_n \rightarrow \phi$ weakly-$*$, then $\|\phi\|\leq \limsup_n \|\phi_n\|$. 
$\phi_n \rightarrow \phi$ weakly-$*$, then $\|\phi\|\leq \limsup_n
 \|\phi_n\|$.

My attempt:
$$\|\phi\| = \sup_{\|x\| = 1} |\phi(x)| \leq \sup_{\|x\| = 1} \lim_n |\phi_n(x)|$$
Using an epsilon-argument, there exists an $x_0$ with norm one such that 
$$\|\phi\| \leq \lim_n |\phi_n(x_0)| + \epsilon$$
then
$$\|\phi\| \leq \limsup_n \sup_{\|x\| = 1} |\phi_n(x)| + \epsilon = \|\phi_n\| + \epsilon.$$
Question:
could you please provide an explicit example such that $\phi_n \rightarrow \phi$ weakly-$*$ and
$$\|\phi\| > \liminf \|\phi_n\|.$$
Thank you very much!
Edit: For the counter example, $\phi_n$ has to converge weakly-$*$ to something that is not the zero functional. We want
$$\|\phi\| > \liminf \|\phi_n\|,$$
not 
$$\|\phi\| < \liminf \|\phi_n\|.$$
I know $\|\phi\|\leq \liminf \|\phi_n\|$ holds for $\phi_n \rightarrow \phi$ weakly. When the space is not reflexive, weak-$*$ convergence does not imply weak convergence, so I was hoping to find a counter example for this inequality.
Basically, I want to know why the inequality in the problem is a $\limsup$ but not $\liminf$ (which holds for weak convergence).
 A: The correct inequality is $||\phi|| \le \lim \inf ||\phi_n||\ $. $\ $Let's prove it. Let $M = ||\phi||$. Take $\epsilon >0$ arbitrary. There exists $x$ of norm $1$ so that $|\phi(x)| > M -\epsilon$. Since $\phi_n(x)$ converges to $\phi(x)$ we also have $|\phi_n(x)| \to |\phi(x)|$. Therefore $|\phi_n(x)|> M-\epsilon$ for $n$ large enough. But $||\phi_n|| \ge |\phi_n(x)|$ since $||x||=1$.
We conclude that $||\phi_n|| > M-\epsilon$ for $n$ large enough and therefore $\lim \inf ||\phi_n|| \ge M -\epsilon$. Since $\epsilon > 0$ was arbitrary we conclude
$\lim \inf ||\phi_n|| \ge M$ that is 
$$\lim \inf ||\phi_n|| \ge ||\phi||$$
This inequality can be strict. Consider an infinite dimensional Hilbert space. A Hilbert space is self dual so we may consider vectors instead of functionals. Let $(\phi_n)$ an orthonormal system. Then $\phi_n \to 0$ weakly and $||\phi_n|| = 1$ for all $n$. 
Also, $\phi_n + \phi_0 \to \phi_0$ weakly and $||\phi_n + \phi_0 ||= \sqrt{2}$, $||\phi_0|| =1$.
A: I guess that the OP meant:
$$\|\phi\| \leqslant \liminf_{n\to\infty}\|\phi_n\|,$$
which is always true. The inequality can be however strict.
Take $(\phi_n)_{n=1}^\infty$ to be the canonical basis of $\ell_2 = \ell_2^*$. It converges weak* to 0 but it consists of unit vectors. A similar situation takes place in dual spaces of all infinite dimensional Banach spaces; this is the famous Josefson–Nissenzweig theorem:

If $X$ is an infinite-dimensional Banach space, then there exists a sequence $(\phi_n)_{n=1}^\infty$ of unit vectors in $X^*$ which converges to 0 weak*.

For the references, see

B. Josefson, Weak sequential convergence in the dual of a Banach space does not imply norm convergence, Ark. Mat. 13 (1975), 79–89.
A. Nissenzweig, $w^*$ sequential convergence, Israel J. Math. 22 (1975), 266–272.

