0
$\begingroup$

Let $\Omega_1$ and $\Omega_2$ two open, bounded and convex domains in $R^n$ with $\Omega_1 \supset \overline{\Omega_2}$ and $0 \in \Omega_2.$

Suppose that for each $x_0 \in \partial (\Omega_1 \setminus \overline{\Omega_2})$ exists a ball $B(z, \delta) \subset (\Omega_1 \setminus \overline{\Omega_2} )$ with $x_0 \in \overline{B(z, \delta) }$, where $\delta >0$ is independent of $x_0.$ (*)

A paper that I am reading says :

Then exists $\alpha > 0$, independent of $x_0, $ and $z$ (as in (*)) such that $|(z-x_0).x_0 |\geq \alpha |z - x_0| |x_0| $

Drawing pictures I cans see that the above affirmation is ocurring, but I have no idea to a proof of the affirmation. Someone could help me with a proof?

thanks in advance!

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

First observe that there exist $0 < a < b < \infty$ such that $a < \vert x_0 \vert < b$ for all $x_0 \in \partial (\Omega_1 \setminus \Omega_2)$, since $\Omega_i$ is bounded, $0 \in \Omega_2$ and $\Omega_2$ is open.

Now let $x_0$ and $z$ be arbitrary, satisfying $(*)$. Then $\vert z - x_0 \vert = \delta$, since $x_0 \in \partial B(z,\delta)$. It follows that $$\vert z - x_0 \vert \vert x_0 \vert = \delta \vert x_0 \vert \leq \delta b$$ Therefore, it suffices to show that there exists $0 < m$ (independent of $z$ and $x_0$) such that $$\vert (z - x_0).x_0\vert > m$$ as one just needs to choose $\alpha > 0$ with $\alpha \delta b < m$:

Let us proof this claim for all $x_0 \in \partial \Omega_2 \subset \partial (\Omega_1 \setminus \Omega_2)$. The proof for $x_0 \in \partial \Omega_1$ is more or less the same (note that $\partial (\Omega_1 \setminus \Omega_2) = \partial \Omega_1 \cup \partial \Omega_2$).

Let $x_0 \in \partial \Omega_2$. A supporting half space $H$ at $x_0$ is defined as a closed halfspace containing $\Omega_2$ and with $x_0$ in its boundary. It is not hard to see that there exists a supporting halfspace $H_0$ at $x_0$ which contains $B(z,\delta)$, in fact one can choose the halfspace tangent to $B(z,\delta)$ at $x_0$.

The following is a rather well known general fact: Since $\Omega_2$ is compact with $0$ in its interior, there exists $c > 0$ such that for each $x_0 \in \partial \Omega_2$ and for each supporting halfspace $H$ at $x_0$ the angle between the segment from $x_0$ to $0$ and $H$ is bigger than $c$. (A way to proof this is to assume on the contrary and consider a sequence of supporting half spaces where this angle goes to $0$. Then one can consider a limit of this half spaces which is a supporting halfspace itself containing $0$ in its boundary, contradicting the fact that $0$ is an interior point of $\Omega_2$)

Now, since $0$ is an interior point of $\overline \Omega_2$, it follows that the angle between the segment from $x_0$ to $0$ and $H_0$ is bounded below by $c$, independent of $x_0$ and $z$. Since $H_0$ is tangent to $B(z,\delta)$ at $x_0$ it follows that the angle between the segments from $x_0$ to $0$ and from $x_0$ to $z$ is bigger than $\pi/2 + c$. Translating this means that the angle between $x_0$ and $z - x_0$, say $\omega$, is smaller that $\pi/2 - \tilde c$ for some $0 < \tilde c < \pi/2$ independent of $x_0$ and $z$. Therefore, $$(z - x_0).x_0 = \cos(\omega)\vert z - x_0 \vert \vert x_0 \vert > \epsilon \vert z - x_0 \vert \vert x_0\vert = \epsilon \delta \vert x_0 \vert > \epsilon \delta a,$$ independet of $x_0$ and $z$, for some $\epsilon > 0$. Setting $m = \epsilon \delta a$ we are done.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.