Notation of list expansion to a tuple I have a set $S$ that I want to expand to a $|S|$-tuple. How is the notation for that?
Currently I have something like that:
$$
T = (f(x) : x \in S)
$$
An example:
$$
S = (A,B,C)\\
T = (f(A), f(B), f(C))
$$
In Mathematica the Map Function does what I want.
So basically I want to expand a set of elements and add an entry to a tuple for every element of the set. I need the same functionality a summation does, without building the final sum - if that is of any help.
Can I express this the way I did?
UPDATE
As I want the order of the resulting tuple to be preserved, it is necessary to map from a tuple to a tuple - so $S = (A,B,C)$ instead of $S = \{A,B,C\}$.
Also if you're having the same issue, the Wikipedia Set-builder notation is a good place to start with.
 A: If you have a set $S$ and you want the set of values that you can get by applying $f$ to elements of $S$, you can write $$\{f(s) \mid s\in S\}.$$ This is the set of all values of the form $f(s)$, for some $s$ in $S$.  This notation is standard.
If you say up front “We will use the notation $f^*(S)$ to abbreviate the set $\{f(s) \mid s\in S\}$”, nobody will complain.  
Your question asks for tuples, which are different, because the elements of a tuple have an order, whereas the elements of a set don't. (The sets $\{1,2,3\}$ and $\{3,1,2\}$ are the same, but the tuples $\langle 1,2,3\rangle$ and $\langle 3,1,2\rangle$ are different.) But I think you are looking for sets and not for tuples.
If you really do want tuples, you can still do the same thing:  You can say “When $T$ is a tuple, we will use the notation $f^*(T)$ to mean the tuple obtained by applying $f$ to the components of $T$ individually.”
Or if you don't like my $f^*$ suggestion, feel free to make up whatever seems convenient.  Instead of writing $f^*$ you could write $\operatorname{map}[f]$. Notation is flexible. You can use what seems convenient, as long as you explain it clearly.
