If $(x_{\alpha})_{\alpha \in \Lambda}$ is a net, then $x$ is an accumulation point of the net if for every $A \in \mathcal F_x$, the set $\{\alpha \in \Lambda: x_{\alpha}\in A\}$ is cofinal in $\Lambda$. Prove that $x$ is an accumulation point of the net if and only if there is a subnet of $(x_{\alpha})_{\alpha \in \Lambda}$ that converges to $x$.

I couldn't do much of the exercise. Here is what I've thought for the first implication:

If $S=\{\alpha \in \Lambda: x_{\alpha}\in A\}$ is cofinal in $\Lambda$, then, by definition, for every $\alpha \in \Lambda$, there is $\beta \in S$ such that $\beta \geq \alpha$. I want to construct a subnet that converges to $x$. For every open set $U: x \in U$, there must be an element $y_U$ of the subnet such that $y_U \in U$. I know that the elements of the subnet are going to be some (or all) elements of $S$. I am pretty lost on how to construct the subnet

As for the other implication I have no idea how to show it. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Should it not be: iff there exists a subnet that converges to $x$? That I can prove. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Aug 20 '14 at 14:23
  • $\begingroup$ What definition of subnet do you use? There are 3 different such notions. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Aug 20 '14 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ THanks for the correction, I am using this definition en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subnet_%28mathematics%29 $\endgroup$ – user16924 Aug 20 '14 at 16:55

Suppose that $(y_\beta)_{\beta \in B}$ is a subnet of $(x_\alpha)$ via the map $h:B \rightarrow A$, and this subnet converges to $x$. Let $O$ be an open subset of $X$ that contains $x$. Then by the convergence we have some $\beta_0 \in B$, such that for all $\beta \ge \beta_0$ we have that $(y_\beta) \in O$. Then consider the set $A_O=\{ \alpha \in A: x_\alpha \in O \}$; we have to show it is cofinal in $A$ to see that $x$ is an accumulation point of the original net.

To this end, pick $\alpha \in A$. Then as $h[B]$ is cofinal in $A$, there is some $\beta_1 \in B$ such that $h(\beta_1) \ge \alpha$. Then, as $B$ is directed, there is some $\beta_2 \in B$, such that $\beta_2 \ge \beta_1, \beta_2 \ge \beta_0$. Now $y_{\beta_2} \in O$, and also $y_{\beta_2} = x_{h(\beta_2)}$ (definition of subnet) and as $\alpha \le h(\beta_1) \le h(\beta_2)$ (using that $h$ is increasing), we have an index larger than $\alpha$ that is in $A_O$, so indeed this set is cofinal.

Now suppose that $x$ is an accumulation point of $(x_\alpha)$. Now define the set $$B= \{(\alpha, U): \alpha \in A, U \text{ open and such that } x_\alpha \in U \}\text{.}$$ Define a partial order by $(\alpha_1, U_1) \le (\alpha_2, U_2) \text{ iff } \alpha_1 \le \alpha_2, \text{ and } U_2 \subseteq U_1$. One easily checks that this makes $B$ a directed set, and defining $h: B \rightarrow A$ by $h((\alpha, U)) = \alpha$, and again a small check shows that setting $y_\beta = y_{(\alpha,U)} = x_\alpha$ defines a subnet via $h$ (do these checks yourself!). And $(y_\beta)_{\beta \in B}$ converges to $x$: let $O$ be an open neighbourhood of $x$. Then the set $A_O$ (as defined above) is cofinal in $A$, so pick any $\alpha_0 \in A$ such that $x_{\alpha_0} \in O$. Then $\beta_0 = (\alpha_0, O) \in B$, and if $\beta = (\alpha, U) \ge \beta_0$, we know in particular that $U \subset O$, and $y_\beta = x_\alpha \in U \subset O$, so indeed all net elements with index larger than $\beta_0$ are in $O$, as required.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.