I'm trying to prove the equivalence of the following statements:

Suppose $M^m$ and $N^n$ are smooth manifolds, $S\subseteq M\times N$ immersed, and $\pi_M$ and $\pi_N$ the projection maps. TFAE:

1) $S$ is the graph of a smooth function $f\colon M\to N$

2) $\pi_M|_S$ is a diffeomorphism from $S$ onto $M$,

3) For each $p\in M$, the submanifolds $S$ and $\{p\}\times N$ intersect transversely in exactly one point.

I've shown $(1)\iff (2)$, and $(2)\implies (3)$. I can include that work if needed. Right now I'm just trying to show $(3)$ implies either of the other two.

If $S$ and $\{p\}\times N$ intersect transversely in one point, then the inclusion $\iota\colon S\to M\times N$ is transverse to $\{p\}\times N$, and $\iota^{-1}(p\times N)$ is a singleton. Then this means there exists some $(p,q)\in S$ such that $(p,q)\in p\times N$, thus $\pi_M|_S$ is surjective, and it must be injective since $\iota^{-1}(p\times N)$ is a singleton.

The transversality condition implies $$ T_{(p,q)}(p\times N)+d\iota_{(p,q)}(T_{(p,q)}S)\simeq T_{(p,q)}N+T_{(p,q)}(S)=T_{(p,q)}(M\times N) $$

so necessarily $\dim(T_{(p,q)}(S))\geq m$, by dimension considerations.

As a bijection, it's enough to show $\pi_M|_S$ is either of constant rank, or a local diffeomorphism to prove it's a diffeomorphism. As a projection map, I feel like it should be a submersion onto $M$, and that would do the trick.

Note: This is Theorem 6.32 in John Lee's Intro to Smooth Manifolds.

  • $\begingroup$ Yes. Check out the proof of parametrized transversality in Guillemin and Pollack. $\endgroup$ – Charlie Frohman Aug 18 '14 at 4:03
  • $\begingroup$ @CharlieFrohman Where is that? I'm scanning sections 1.6 and 2.3 on Transverality, but don't see it in either. $\endgroup$ – Clara Aug 18 '14 at 4:47
  • $\begingroup$ Oops, 1.5 not 1.6 $\endgroup$ – Clara Aug 18 '14 at 16:35

You've got 99% of the proof already. Hint: Suppose $d\pi_M|_S$ is not surjective and think about the isomorphisms $T_{(p,q)} S+ T_{(p,q)}(\{p\} \times N) \cong T_{(p,q)}(M \times N) \cong T_p M \times T_q N$.

Click/rollover for full answer below:

Full answer. Given $(p,q)\in S$ and $v \in T_p M$, transversality implies that $(v,0) \in T_p(M \times N)$ equals $a+b$ for some $a \in T_{(p,q)} S $ and $b \in T_{(p,q)}(\{p\} \times N)$. Since $T_{(p,q)}(\{p\} \times N)$ lies in the kernel of $d\pi_M$, $v$ lies in the image of $d(\pi_M|_S)$: $v=d\pi_M(a+b)=d\pi_M(a)+d\pi_M(b)=d(\pi_M|_S)(a)+0=0.$ So $d(\pi_M|_S)$ is surjective at $(p,q)$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks squirrel. How do you know $(v,0)\in T_{(p,q)}S$? Are you writing $(v,0)=a+b$ for $a\in T_{(p,q)}S$, $b\in T_{(p,q)}(\{p\}\times N)$, and then applying $d\pi_N$ to get $0=d\pi_N(a)+d\pi_N(b)$ or something? And then the result follows from $d(\pi_M|_S)(v,0)=v$? $\endgroup$ – Clara Aug 19 '14 at 4:45
  • $\begingroup$ My phrasing may have been unclear. How's this: $v=d\pi_M(a+b)=(d\pi_M)|_{T_{(p,q)}S} (a)+(d \pi_M)|_{T_{(p,q)}(\{p\}\times N)}(b)=(d\pi_M)|_{T_{(p,q)}S} (a)+0=d(\pi_M|_S)(a).$ $\endgroup$ – Kyle Aug 19 '14 at 12:43
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for catching my error. I realized I didn't mean "$(v,0) \in T_{(p,q)}S$" but rather $"(v,\text{[something]}) \in T_{(p,q)}S$". I edited the original post accordingly. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Aug 19 '14 at 14:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.