2
$\begingroup$

As we know, a minimal projection must be Abelian, An Abelian projection must be finite. A minimal projection correspond to a rank one operator, a finite projection correspond to a finite rank operator, what kind of operator be corresponded with the Abelian projection?

I find some book use Abelian projections to define the type I von-Neumann algebras, but others use minimal projections instead. In general, how close are minimal projections to Abeilian projections?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

You cannot define type I von Neumann algebras in terms of minimal projections, since many don't have them; $L^\infty[0,1]$, for example. What you probably saw is that some texts only care about factors, and in a factor the abelian projections are precisely the minimal ones.

Rank one projections (not "operators") are an example of a minimal projection. But minimality is a condition inside the algebra. If you consider an infinite projection $p$ and let $M=\{\alpha p+\beta(1-p):\ \alpha,\beta\in\mathbb C\}$, then $M$ is a von Neumann algebra with $p$ a minimal projection; I wouldn't call it a "rank one operator".

The same with finite projections. Finite rank projections are the finite projections of the von Neumann algebra $B(H)$. But all projections in a II$_1$-factor are finite, and no one would call those "finite-rank".

As $B(H)$ is a factor, its only abelian projections are the minimal ones. So there is no natural operators that you would call "abelian projections".

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, yes, it is factor! In general, does any abelian projection can be decomposed into a minimal projection and a projection in an Abelian von Neumann algebra(each part maybe zero)? $\endgroup$
    – Strongart
    Aug 19, 2014 at 5:32
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry but I cannot really make sense of how you want to write your projection. What do you mean by "a projection in an Abelian von Neumann algebra"? $\endgroup$ Aug 19, 2014 at 5:42
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I do not get the standard word to say this ideal, roughly speaking, you give an example L∞[0,1] which has no minimal projections, the projection in it is an example, maybe we can call it "Abelian projection containing no minimal projection". $\endgroup$
    – Strongart
    Aug 19, 2014 at 14:03
  • $\begingroup$ I think I understand what you are saying. Suppose your vN algebra is $\mathbb C^2\oplus M_2(\mathbb C)$. Then $(1,1)\oplus 0$ is an Abelian projection, and $(1,0)\oplus0$ and $(0,1)\oplus 0$ are proper minimal projections below your Abelian projection. $\endgroup$ Aug 19, 2014 at 15:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Probably because they have been called "factors" for the last 80 years. $\endgroup$ Aug 22, 2014 at 12:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.