invertible matrices connected or not The question asks "Is the set of all $3\times3$ real invertible matrices connected?"
My intuitive idea is that we can establish a separation consisting of matrices with positive and negative determinant respectively, whose union will be the whole set but with no intersections. However I am not sure how to show intersection of one set with the closure of the other set is empty, according to the definition of being disconnected. (My guess is that the closure for real matrices with negative determinant is just itself union matrices with 0 determinant)
So what will be a rigorous proof of this, using only tools in point-set topology and knowledge in linear algebra? 
I know that $3\times3$ matrices can be viewed as homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^9$, but how do we define the topology on this subspace (i.e. set of all $3\times3$ matrices)? What will an open set look like in this topology?
 A: The set of invertible matrices is open.
To see this, first note that if $\|\cdot\|$ is a sub-multiplicative norm, and
$\|X\| <1$, then the series $\sum_{n=0}^\infty \|X^n\|$ is bounded and so the matrix $Y=\sum_{n=0}^\infty (-1)^nX^n$ is well-defined. It is easy to check that $Y(I+X) = I$, and so the matrix $\|I+X\|$ is invertible. To emphasise, if we 'perturb' the identity $I$ by an amount $X$, then $I+X$ is invertible whenever $\|X\|<1$.
Now suppose $A$ is invertible. Then $A+X = A(I+A^{-1} X)$, hence if $\|A^{-1} X\| < 1$, we see that $A+X$ is invertible. In particular, if $\|X\| < {1 \over \|A^{-1}\| }$, then $A+X$ is invertible. Hence the set of invertible matrices is open. (I am implicitly using the fact that all norms on finite-dimensional spaces are equivalent, so the particular norm used doesn't matter.)
If the set of invertible matrices was connected, then since open, this would imply path connected as well.
Hence we could connect $A$ to $-A$ by some path, but since you are dealing with a $3 \times 3$ matrix, we have  $\det (-A) = - \det A$, hence at some point the path would pass through zero (by continuity).
(A more detailed analysis, see How many connected components does $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb R)$ have? for example, shows that there are exactly two connected components.)
A: $$\det(\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\})^{-1}=\underbrace{\det(\langle-\infty;0\rangle)^{-1}}_{A}\cup\underbrace{\det(\langle0;+\infty\rangle)^{-1}}_{B}$$
Since $\det()$ is continous, then $A,B$ are two open sets, non empty, disjoints in clousure, so $\det(\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\})^{-1}$ is disconnected.
A: *

*The image of a connected subset under a continuous map is connected.

*The determinant is a surjective continuous map $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{R}) \to \mathbb{R}^*$.

*The space $\mathbb{R}^*$ is not connected.


Now conclude. :)
By the way, one can show that $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{R})^+ = \{A \in \mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{R}) : \det(A)>0\}$ is connected, and likewise $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{R})^-$, so that $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{R})$ has two connected components. But $\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})$ is connected.
A: With regard to Luis Felipe VillavicencioLopez request for a credible source: a proof can be found in Frank W. Warner, Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups, Theorem 3.68 (page 131 in my copy).
