Call an integer 'n' that is not a square or a prime power or a square-free a 'square-in'.Let n be square-in. Then between n and (2 n) is there another square-in? This is a kind of 'variation' on Bertrand's Postulate.

  • $\begingroup$ Let there exist Sr and S(r+1) ; two consecutive square-ins where S(r+1)/ S(r) > 2. So S(r) < 2S(r) < S(r+1) yet (2 S(r)) would be square-in. Contradiction. Therefore for any square-ins S(r) and S(r+1) ; S(r+1)/ S(r) <= 2 . If there is an integer n such that between n and 2n there is no square-in then there exists square-ins S(t) and S(t+1) where S(t) < n < 2n < S(t+1) yet S(t+1)/S(t) <= 2 , contradiction. Does this prove the above? $\endgroup$ – user128932 Sep 21 '14 at 4:38

For $n > 8$ the answer is certainly, as we just need to look at multiples of four, and at least one of them is not a square.

$n=1$ false, $n = 2$ false, $n = 3$ false, $n = 4$ true if we allow the upper bound of the range. $5 \leq n \leq 8$ all true due to either $8,12$. So depending on the definition, take $n \geq 4$ or $n > 4$.

EDIT: It has been noted that you require $n$ to be square-in, the first of which is $8$. So the claim is true.

  • $\begingroup$ Due to the restriction that $n$ is square-in, the hypothesis is true for all positive $n$, since the first positive square-in $n$ is $8$. $\endgroup$ – Fengyang Wang Aug 15 '14 at 3:09
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, yes. I missed that. $\endgroup$ – JHance Aug 15 '14 at 3:10
  • $\begingroup$ Between 12 and 24 there is 18 and 20. Between 20 and 40 there is 24, 28,and 36( forgive errors) So for n (such that 12 <= n <= 35) there is a square-in between n an 2 n. $\endgroup$ – user128932 Sep 6 '14 at 4:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $8$ is a prime power, so isn't the first square-in actually $12$? $\endgroup$ – Barry Cipra Sep 8 '14 at 8:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.