2
$\begingroup$

So I have recently started to delve into integral representation theory and I was wondering if a particularly useful theorem survives the transition to integral rep theory. Basically, suppose we have two $\mathbf{Z}G$ modules $M$ and $N$ such that their representations are isomorphic. Clearly this means they have equal characters. What I am wondering is whether this implies $M\cong N$, and if so, where I can find such a proof. I am interested in this since obviously this holds over fields of characteristic zero which are algebraically closed. Any help in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am a little unsure what you mean here. Do you mean you have two $\mathbf{Z}G$-modules with equal characters, and you want to know if this implies that the modules are isomorphic? $\endgroup$ – Tobias Kildetoft Aug 12 '14 at 13:43
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that is what I mean. $\endgroup$ – Sam Williams Aug 12 '14 at 13:50
2
$\begingroup$

If you want an example where the modules are free over $\mathbb{Z}$, then let $G=\langle g\rangle$ be a cyclic group of order $2$, let $M=\mathbb{Z}G$ be the regular $\mathbb{Z}G$-module, and let $N=U\oplus V$ be a direct sum of two copies of $\mathbb{Z}$, where $g$ acts trivially on $U$ and by multiplication by $-1$ on $V$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Jeremy, thank you for answering. Perhaps I am being a bit slow but are you supposing this is a counter example to my question? $\endgroup$ – Sam Williams Aug 12 '14 at 22:20
  • $\begingroup$ @SamWilliams Yes, both modules have the regular character, but they are not isomorphic, since $N$ is a direct sum of two rank $1$ modules but $M$ is not. $\endgroup$ – Jeremy Rickard Aug 13 '14 at 5:39
  • $\begingroup$ Ah okay, now this makes more sense. Do you know if there is ever a case where this holds? Such as for lattices etc? $\endgroup$ – Sam Williams Aug 13 '14 at 14:02
  • $\begingroup$ @SamWilliams If by "lattice" you mean a $\mathbb{Z}$-free $\mathbb{Z}G$-module, then the modules in my example are both lattices. $\endgroup$ – Jeremy Rickard Aug 13 '14 at 15:36
  • $\begingroup$ By lattice I meant a $\mathbf{Z}G$ module whose underlying abelian group is both finitely generated and torsion free. $\endgroup$ – Sam Williams Aug 13 '14 at 19:51
1
$\begingroup$

The answer is no. One example to keep in mind is the 2 dimensional representation of $\mathbb{Z}/p$ over $\mathbb{F}_p$ where 1 acts by the matrix $$\left( \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1\end{array} \right)$$

This representation has trivial character.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps I m missing your point but that is because we are working over a finite field, rather than the integers which are certainly infinite. $\endgroup$ – Sam Williams Aug 12 '14 at 22:17
  • $\begingroup$ Working over a finite field is over the integers. ZG modules are just abelian groups with G actions. $\endgroup$ – jspecter Aug 12 '14 at 22:36
  • $\begingroup$ Note that in Jeremy's answer $M \otimes \mathbb{F}_2$ is exactly the representation of $Z/p$ described in my answer for $p = 2.$ In fact, the fact $M \not\cong N$ can be attributed to exactly this problem at 2 as $M[1/2] \cong N[1/2].$ $\endgroup$ – jspecter Aug 12 '14 at 22:39
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this has cleared up things for somewhat $\endgroup$ – Sam Williams Aug 13 '14 at 14:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.