2
$\begingroup$

Let ∼ be the equivalence relation on $\mathbb{R^2}$ defined by $(x, y) ∼ (x_0 , y_0 )$ if and only if there is a nonzero $t$ with $(x, y) = (tx_0 , ty_0$ ). Prove that the quotient space $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼ $ is compact but not Hausdorff.

My attempt : $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼ $ is homeomorphic to $\{e^{i\theta} \ | \ 0 \leq \theta < \pi\} \bigcup \{(0,0)\}$ which is homeomorphic to $[0,1]$ (if we consider the standard topology on $\mathbb{R^2}$ and $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$) by the homeomorphism $f:\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼ \to [0,1]$ defined by $$f(e^{i\theta})=1-\frac{\theta}{\pi} \ \ \ \ \ \ 0 \leq \theta < \pi$$ and $$f((0,0))=0$$ This function is bijective and continuous (since preimage of any open set is open in $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$) with a continuous inverse $$f^{-1}: [0,1] \to \mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$$ $$f^{-1}(x)=e^{\pi(1-x)} \ \ \ if \ \ 0 < x \leq 1$$ and $$f^{-1}(0)=(0,0)$$ Because of this homeomorphism $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$ is compact. But in the standard topology this space is not Hausdorff , since any neighborhood of $(0,0) \in \mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$ contains every other point in $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$ .

Is my argument about compactness and Hausdorffness of $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$ correct ?

But I was thinking : If we give the discrete topology to $\mathbb{R^2}$, this topology induces discrete topology on $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$ as the quotient topology, in that case $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$ is indeed Hausdorff but NOT compact since $\mathbb{R^2}/ ∼$ is infinite.

I already appreciate any helpful comments/answers , Thanks !

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\Bbb R^2/\sim$ can't be homeomorphic to $\{e^{i\theta} \ | \ 0 \leq \theta < \pi\} \bigcup \{(0,0)\}$; one is Hausdorff, but the other (purportedly) is not $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Aug 11 '14 at 0:19
1
$\begingroup$

The maps you claim to be homeomorphisms are not homeomorphisms. So, your argument for compactness is inherently flawed. I would use the following:

Note that the image of $D = \{(x,y) : x^2 + y^2 \leq 1\} \subset \Bbb R^2$ under the quotient map $\Bbb R^2 \to \Bbb R^2 /\sim$ is the entirety of the target space. That is, there is a continuous map from $D$ onto $\Bbb R^2 /\sim$. Note that $D$ is compact.

Your idea about the space not being Hausdorff is ostensibly correct; the space is not Hausdorff because every (open) neighborhood of $(0,0)/\sim$ is the entire space.

Your statement about the discrete topology is also correct.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much !Can you please shortly explain why there is a continuous map from $D$ onto $\mathbb{R^2} / \sim $ ? $\endgroup$ – the8thone Aug 11 '14 at 2:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The quotient map from $\Bbb R^2 \to \Bbb R^2/\sim$ is continuous. So is its restriction to $D \subset \Bbb R^2$. $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Aug 11 '14 at 12:29
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your helpful answer! $\endgroup$ – the8thone Aug 11 '14 at 16:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.