What's the natural deduction of this exercise?

Premise: $\lnot p \lor \lnot q$
Conclusion: $\lnot(p\land q)$

I must have something like the following, but I do not know how to start.

enter image description here


Proof sketch:

  1. $\lnot p \lor \lnot q$ (premise)

  2. $\quad |\underline{\text{(Assume)}\; p\land q}\;$ (Assumption)

  3. $\quad |\;p\;$ ("$\land$-elimination")

  4. $\quad |\; q\;$ (simplification/$\land$-elimination)

  5. $\qquad |\underline{\;\; \lnot p\;}$ (assumption)

  6. $\qquad | \;\;p \land \lnot p\;$ $\land$-Intro (3, 6)

  7. $\qquad | \;\;$ Contradition. (6)

  8. $\qquad | \underline{\;\; \lnot q\;}$ (assumption)

  9. $\qquad | \;\;q\land \lnot q\;\;\land$-Intro (4, 8)

  10. $\qquad | \;\;$Contradiction (9)

  11. $\quad |\;\;$ Contradiction $\lor$-Elimination (1, 5-10)

  12. $\lnot (p\land q)$ (2-10). Our assumption $p\land q$ leads to a contradiction, so that $\lnot(p \land q)$ is therefore true.

  • $\begingroup$ Sophie, the last step, 12 (conclusion) is justified by "negation introduction". $\endgroup$ – Namaste Aug 6 '14 at 14:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.