5
$\begingroup$

This is the Problem 1-6 of John Lee's Introduction to smooth manifold:

Let $M$ be a nonempty topological manifold of dimension $n\geq1$. If $M$ has a smooth structure, show that it has uncountably many distinct ones. [Hint: first show that for any $s>0$, $F_s(x)=|x|^{s-1}x$ defines a homeomorphism from $\mathbb{B}^n$ to itself, which is a diffeomorphism if and only if $s=1$.]

What I tried:

It can be proved there is a atlas $\mathcal{A}$ (not maximal) which is compact with the original smooth sturcture of $M$ and has the following property: $\forall(U,\psi)\in\mathcal{A}$, $\psi(U)=\mathbb{B}^n$. I tried to define $\psi'=F_s\circ\psi$ and hope $\{(U, \psi')\}$ to form a new atlas for $M$. But $$\varphi'\circ(\psi')^{-1}=F_s\circ\varphi\circ\psi^{-1}\circ F_s^{-1}$$ may not be diffeomorphism. Any help, thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I think the idea is to modify only a single chart - find an atlas which contains a ball whose centre is not in any other chart, then compose the corresponding chart with $F_s$. Since $F_s$ is a diffeomorphism when restricted away from $0$ this should work out. $\endgroup$ – Anthony Carapetis Jul 31 '14 at 6:17
  • $\begingroup$ @AnthonyCarapetis I think you are right. Would you please coppy your comment as an anwser so I can accept it. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – Danielsen Jul 31 '14 at 10:10
4
$\begingroup$

Given a smooth structure, we would like to find a coordinate ball $(U_0,\phi_0)$ such that the center $p$ of $U_0$ is covered by only this chart. It's not hard to see that we need only find a point $p$ covered by one chart. Then we can replace this chart with $(U_0,F_s \circ \phi_0)$ and get a new smooth structure, which is not smoothly compatible with the original one.

By Thm 1.15 and Lemma 1.10, we can find a countable, locally finite open refinement of the smooth structure consisting of precompact coordinate balls. This refinement is also a smooth structure, let's work with it. Then choose an arbitrary point $q$ on the manifold, it has a neighborhood intersects finitely many smooth charts denoted them as $U_1$ ~ $U_k$.

1)If $k=1$, then $q$ is only covered by $U_1$. We can replace $(U_1,\phi_1)$ with $(U_1,F_s\circ\frac{\phi_1 - \phi_1(q)}{r+|\phi_1(q)|})$, where r is the radius of $\phi(U_1)$.

2) If $k>1$, then repeat the following procedure starting from $i=1$: If $U_i$ is covered by the rest charts, then remove it from the refinement and get a new smooth structure otherwise stop the procedure. Eventually, there is going to be a point $q'$ covered by only one precompact coordinate ball. If we stop before $i=k$, then $q' \neq q$ otherwise $q'=q$. Apply 1).

By 1) and 2), we find a smooth structure distinct from the original one. Since there are uncountably many $F_s$, we have proved that given any smooth structure of a topological manifold, there exists uncountably many distinct smooth structures on the manifold.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You are welcome to post an Answer to this two+ year-old Question, but you've structured your post as a Comment. If you wish, revise your post to benefit future Readers as a self-contained Answer. Review How do I write a good Answer? for guidelines. $\endgroup$ – hardmath Feb 6 '17 at 19:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ F_s is not a diffeomorphism, I don't understand how it yields a smooth structure. $\endgroup$ – ciceksiz kakarot Mar 3 '17 at 5:51
3
$\begingroup$

It took me a while to understand the great idea proposed by Anthony Carapetis, once I think that other people can have the same doubt that I had, I decided to write a more detailed answer using his idea.

First of all, remember the Proposition 1.17 (this proposition is very easy to prove) of John Lee's Introduction to smooth manifold: enter image description here

and note that $F_s: B(0,1) \rightarrow B(0,1)$ is an homemorfism that isn't a diffeomorphism $\forall s>0$, and $F_s: B(0,1)\setminus \{0\} \rightarrow B(0,1)\setminus \{0\}$ is a smooth diffeomorphism $\forall s>0$ ( where $B(y,r) = \{x\in \mathbb{R}^n;$ $|x-y|<r$ $\}$).

Let $\mathcal{A} = (\varphi_i,U_i)_{i \in I}$ be a smooth atlas of $M$. We will construct a smooth atlas $\mathcal{B}$ such that $\mathcal{A} \cup \mathcal{B}$ is not a smooth atlas.

Note that for every $x$ $\in$ $M$, $\exists$ a chart $(\varphi_x,U_x)$ $\in$ $\mathcal{A}$, satisfying $x$ $\in$ $U_x$. Using that $\varphi(U_x) \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is open, $\exists$ $\delta_x >0$, such that, $B(\varphi(x), \delta_x) \subset \varphi (U_x)$.

So, we can define a smooth atlas $\mathcal{C} = (\varphi_x, \varphi^{-1}_x \left( B(\varphi(x),\delta_x) \right) )_{x \in M}$, which has the same smooth structure of $\mathcal{A}$.

Also, notice that for every $x\in M$, $\exists$ $\xi_x : B(\varphi(x), \delta_x) \rightarrow B(0,1)$, smooth diffeomorphism between $B(\varphi(x), \delta_x)$ and $B(0,1)$ (In fact, $\xi_x(y) = \frac{1}{\delta_x}(y-\varphi(x) )$ ).

Consequently, we are able to define a new smooth atlas $\mathcal{D} = (\xi_x \circ \varphi_x, \varphi_x^{-1}(B(\varphi(x), \delta_x) )_{x \in M}$, which has the same smooth structure of $\mathcal{A}$ and $B(0,1) = \xi_x \circ \varphi^{-1}_x(B(\varphi(x),\delta_x ))$, $\forall$ $x$ $\in$ $M$.

Now, fixed $x_0$ $\in$ $M$, and using that $M$ is Hausdorff, for every $y$ $\in$ $M$ ($y$ $\neq$ $x$), exists a neighborhood $V_y$ of $y$, such that $x$ $\notin$ $V_y$.

Therefore, $\mathcal{E} = (\xi_{x_0} \circ \varphi_{x_0}, \varphi_x^{-1}(B(\varphi(x_0), \delta_{x_0}) ) \cup (\xi_y \circ \varphi_y, \varphi_y^{-1}(B(\varphi(y), \delta_y) \cap V_y )_{y \in M\setminus \{x_0\}}$ is a smooth atlas which has same smooth structure of $\mathcal{A}$.

So, we can finally use Carapetis' idea. Define $$\mathcal{B} = (F_s \circ \xi_{x_0} \circ \varphi_{x_0}, \varphi_x^{-1}(B(\varphi(x_0), \delta_{x_0}) ) \cup (\xi_y \circ \varphi_y, \varphi_y^{-1}(B(\varphi(y), \delta_y) \cap V_y )_{y \in M\setminus \{x_0\}},$$

Now, we need to prove that $\mathcal{B}$ is a smooth atlas, the only nontrivial property that needs to be checked is if, for all $y$ $\in$ $M\setminus \{x_0\}$

$$F_s \circ \xi_{x_0} \circ \varphi_{x_0} \circ (\xi_{y} \circ \varphi_y)^{-1}: \xi_y \circ \varphi_y (Z_y) \rightarrow F_s \circ \xi_{x_0}\circ \varphi_{x_0} (Z_y), $$

( where $Z_y = \left( V_y \cap \varphi_y^{-1}(B(\varphi(y), \delta_{y})) \right) \cap \varphi_{x_0}^{-1}(B(\varphi(x_0), \delta_{x_0}))$ ) is a smooth diffeomorphism. This follows directly from the fact that $\xi_{x_0} \circ \varphi_{x_0} \circ (\xi_{y} \circ \varphi_y)^{-1}$ and $F_s\vert_{ \xi_{x_0} \circ \varphi_{x_0} \circ (\xi_{y} \circ \varphi_y)^{-1}(Z_y)}$ are diffemorfisms, because $0$ $\notin \xi_{x_0} \circ \varphi_{x_0} \circ (\xi_{y} \circ \varphi_y)^{-1}(Z_y)$, sinse $x_0$ $\notin$ $U_y$.

Then $\mathcal{B}$ is a smooth atlas, but $\mathcal{B} \cup \mathcal{D}$ isn't a smooth atlas, because

$$F_s = F_s \circ \xi_{x_0} \circ \varphi_{x_0} \circ ( \xi_{x_0} \circ \varphi_{x_0})^{-1} : B(0,1) \rightarrow B(0,1) $$

don't is a smooth diffeomorphism.

Using Proposition 1.17, we conclude that the smooth structure determined by $\mathcal{B}$ is different of smooth structure determined by $\mathcal{A}$ (because of smooth structure determined by $\mathcal{A}$ $=$ smooth structure determined by $\mathcal{D}$ $\neq$ smooth structure determined by $\mathcal{B}$ ). Once this result holds for all $s>0$, we can construct uncountable many differents smooth atlas $\mathcal{B}$, which all have different smooth structures among them. Which completes the demonstration.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.