Let $f$ be differentiable on $[0,+\infty)$, such as$$\lim_{x\to+\infty}\left([f'(x)]^2+f^3(x)\right)=0$$show that $$\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=\lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=0$$

I think this problem is similar to this link and (the background)

For my problem I guess that if $$\lim_{x\to+\infty}\left([f'(x)]^{2m}+f^{2n+1}(x)\right)=0,m,n\in N^{+},n,m>1$$ then we have $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=\lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=0$.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ [] is the integer part ? $\endgroup$ – Donbeo Aug 14 '14 at 14:41
  • $\begingroup$ For your first statement, $f$ is positive right ? $\endgroup$ – Krokop Aug 23 '14 at 12:12

Added: Here's a more concise way of phrasing the argument in (II.) and (III.), that is, of completing the proof once it is established that $f$ must be eventually monotonic (see Paramanand's argument, which I replicate in I). If $f$ is eventually monotonic and satisfies $(1)$ but not $(2)$, then $f$ must eventually be bounded away from $0$, and $f'$ must eventually have constant sign. In that case, $(1)$ implies that $\lim_{x\to\infty} f'(x)/|f(x)|^{b/a}$ exists and is equal to either $1$ or $-1$. For $b/a>1$, this can't be true; otherwise, for sufficiently large $A$, \begin{align*} \limsup_{x\to\infty} \left|{1\over|f(x)|^{b/a-1}} - {1\over|f(A)|^{b/a-1}}\right| &= \limsup_{x\to\infty} \left|(-b/a+1)\int_A^x {f'(t)\over |f(t)|^{b/a}}\,dt\right|\\ & = |-b/a+1|\int_A^\infty {|f'(t)|\over |f(t)|^{b/a}}\,dt \\ & \geq |-b/a + 1| \int_A^\infty {1\over2}\,dt, \end{align*} say. The last quantity is infinite, but the first must be finite since $f$ is bounded away from $0$, and this is our contradiction. (Like I said, this is basically a rephrasing of the argument below.)

Here is I think the (or at least a) proper generalization, together with a complete proof (borrowing, in places, from Paramanand's answer): If $f$ is differentiable on $[0,\infty)$ and there exist $a$ and $b$ with $0<a<b$ such that \begin{align*} \lim_{x\to\infty}{|f'(x)|^a - |f(x)|^b} = 0, \tag{1} \end{align*} then \begin{align*} \lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x) = \lim_{x\to\infty} f(x) = 0. \tag{2} \end{align*} This resolves China Math's problem, since $\left|f'(x)^2 + f(x)^3\right|\geq \left||f'(x)|^2-|f(x)|^3\right|$, and so we can take $a = 2$ and $b = 3$. I suspect that the statement is sharp in the sense that, whenever $0< b\leq a$, there exist functions that satisfy $(1)$ but not $(2)$ (mike's answer suggests that this is true for $b<a$ and the exponential function shows that this is certainly true when $a = b$, though it is also true that $(2)$ is satisfied when $a = b = 1$ if the quantity in $(1)$ is replaced with $f'(x) + f(x)$), but I haven't really attempted to construct them. I suppose you could also ask what happens when $a$ and $b$ are permitted to be negative, but I'm tired.

Anyway, to prove this, I'll follow Paramanand's lead to show (I.) that a function satisfying $(1)$ but not $(2)$ must be eventually monotonic; (II.) that such a function must be unbounded; and (III.) that no function satisfying $(1)$ can be unbounded. This last step—that no unbounded, monotonic function can satisfy $(1)$ but not $(2)$—is the only thing that Paramanand didn't get around to proving, and it basically boils down to the proposition that there is no unbounded, monotonic function $f$ eventually satisfying $|f'|>|f|^\nu$ for some $\nu>1$. Apologies for the recitation of Paramanand's arguments toward the beginning, but I wanted to be complete.

I. If $f$ is not eventually monotonic, then, as Paramanand has pointed out, the set of points, call it $E$, at which it attains a local extremum is unbounded. Since $f'$ vanishes at each point of $E$, we may conclude that $f(x)\to0$ as $x\to\infty$ through $E$. But $\limsup_{x\to\infty}|f(x)| = \limsup_{x\in E, x\to\infty} |f(x)|$, and so it must be that, if $f$ is not eventually monotonic, $f(x)\to0$ as $x\to\infty$.

II. We may now suppose $f$ to be monotonic. If it is bounded, then $f(x)$ does tend to a limit, call it $L$, as $x\to\infty$. The equation $(1)$ then implies that $|f'(x)|$ converges to $|L|$ as $x\to\infty$. A variation on Paramanand's mean value argument then establishes that $L = 0$: \begin{align*} \text{$|f(x+1) - f(x)| = |f'(\xi)|$ for some $\xi\in(x,x+1)$}; \end{align*} as $x\to\infty$, the left side of the equation vanishes while the right side necessarily tends to $L$. Thus $L = 0$, and we are done in case $f$ is bounded.

III. Finally, assume that $f$ is unbounded. (We also retain, of course, the assumption that $f$ is monotonic.) Then $|f(x)|\to\infty$ and $f$ does not vanish for sufficiently large $x$—I'm going to show that this cannot happen when the growth of $f'$ is a lot greater than that of $f$. Since $0<a<b$, we may choose $\nu$ with $1<\nu < b/a$. I claim now that $|f'(x)|>|f(x)|^\nu$ for all sufficiently large $x$. Otherwise, the set of $x$ for which \begin{align*} |f'(x)|^a - |f(x)|^b < |f(x)|^{a\nu} - |f(x)|^b \end{align*} would be unbounded, and that is not so because the left hand side is supposed to vanish in the limit $x\to\infty$, while the right hand side tends to $-\infty$ by virtue of the facts that $|f(x)|\to\infty$ with $x$ and $0 < a\nu < b$. My claim is justified.

But now consider the function $g(x) = |f(x)|^{-\nu+1}$. Because $f(x)$ doesn't vanish for sufficiently large $x$, $g$ is differentiable for sufficiently large $x$, and because $\nu>1$ and $|f(x)|\to\infty$ with $x$, we can be sure that $g(x)\to0$ as $x\to\infty$. We can also be sure, however, that for $x$ sufficiently large (large enough that $g$ is differentiable at $x$ and $|f'(x)|>|f(x)|^\nu$) \begin{align*} |g'(x)| = |(-\nu+1)f(x)^{-\nu}f'(x)| > |-\nu + 1|. \end{align*} This, together with the mean value theorem, raises a problem: if $x$ and $y$ are sufficiently large, as above, then, for some $\xi\in (x,y)$, \begin{align*} |g(x) - g(y)| & = |g'(\xi)(x-y)| \\ & > |-\nu + 1||x-y|. \end{align*} Since $|-\nu+1|>0$, the right hand side tends to infinity with $x$ if we hold $y$ fixed. That is the desired contradiction, because we should have $\lim_{x\to\infty}g(x) = 0$ and hence the left hand side should tend in the limit $x\to\infty$ to the finite quantity $|g(y)|$.

  • $\begingroup$ The last argument which I could not provide is really a gem! +1 $\endgroup$ – Paramanand Singh Aug 27 '14 at 9:29

This is not a rigorous answer. I just need the space to easily type the equations.

Let us consider the ODE holds near $x\to\infty$:

$$(f'(x))^2+f^3(x)=0 \tag{1}$$

The solution to (1) is:

$$f(x)=-\frac{4}{(x+c)^2} \implies f'(x)=\frac{8}{(x+c)^3}$$

So $$\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=0,\lim_{x\to\infty}f'(x)=0 \tag{2}$$

Now let us consider the next ODE holds near infinity:

$$(f'(x))^{2m}+f^{2n+1}(x)=0,m,n\in N^{+},n,m>1\tag{3}$$

The solution to (3) is given by:

$$f(x)= 4^{m/(1 - 2m + 2n)} \left(\frac{i^{1/m}(-1 + 2m - 2n)(1 + x)}{m}\right)^{(2m)/(-1 + 2m - 2n)}\tag{4}$$

where the integration constant is set to be $i^{1/m}$. When we set $m=3,n=2$, we obtain:

$$f(x) = -\frac{(1 + x)^6}{46656}, f'(x)=-\frac{(1 + x)^5}{7776} \tag{5}$$

Clearly $f(x),f'(x)$ of (5) do not satisfy (2).


Let's try in the following manner (a style taken from Hardy's Pure Mathematics for the problem related to $f'(x) + f(x) \to 0$).

Suppose $f'(x) \geq 0$ for sufficiently large $x$. Then $f(x)$ is increasing and hence tends to a limit or to $\infty$. It follows that $f(x)$ has a constant sign for sufficiently large $x$. Since $\{f'(x)\}^{2} + \{f(x)\}^{3} \to 0$, it follows that $f(x)$ must be negative for large $x$. It follows that $f(x) \to A$ where $A \leq 0$. This means that $f'(x) \to (-A)^{3/2}$. When both $f'(x)$ and $f(x)$ tend to a limit then $f'(x) \to 0$ (this is easy to see if consider the equation $f(x) - f(x/2) = (x/2)f'(c)$ by MVT). Thus we see that $A = 0$ and we are done.

Same way we can handle the case when $f'(x) < 0$ for sufficiently large $x$.

If $f'(x)$ changes sign for all sufficiently large $x$ (meaning that given any real number $N > 0$, there is an $x_{1} > N$ such that $f'(x_{1}) < 0$ and an $x_{2} > N$ such that $f'(x_{2}) > 0$) then this means that there are sufficiently large values of $x$ which serve as extrema points of $f$. Since $\left[\{f(x)\}^{3}\right]' = 3\{f(x)\}^{2}f'(x)$ it follows that these points are also the extrema of $\{f(x)\}^{3}$. At these extrema points we have $f'(x) = 0$ and also $\{f'(x)\}^{2} + \{f(x)\}^{3} \to 0$ so that $f(x) \to 0$ when $x$ is tending to $\infty$ through these extrema points. Since the values of $f$ at the extrema points tends to $0$ then the values of $f$ at other large points $x$ will also tend to $0$. It follows that $f(x) \to 0$. And then from condition $\{f'(x)\}^{2} + \{f(x)\}^{3} \to 0$ we get $f'(x) \to 0$.

Update: I think we can't handle the case when $f'(x) < 0$ for sufficiently large $x$. Because in this case it is possible to have $f(x)$ decreasing to $-\infty$ and $f'(x)$ also decreasing to $-\infty$ and thereby lead to a case when $\{f'(x)\}^{2} \to \infty$ and $\{f(x)\}^{3} \to -\infty$ in such a way as to have the sum tending to $0$. I guess we need to tackle this case in some other manner or there exists a counterexample to the question in this case. Hence this should be considered a partial answer.

  • $\begingroup$ A good "partial answer!" (+1) and Happy Holidays Paramanand! -Mark $\endgroup$ – Mark Viola Dec 23 '16 at 15:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.