Is there also an other way to show the equality: $\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor + \left\lceil \frac{n}{2} \right\rceil=n$?

Question

I want to show that:

$$ \left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor + \left\lceil \frac{n}{2} \right\rceil=n$$

That's what I have tried:

• $ \left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor=\max \{ m \in \mathbb{Z}: m \leq \frac{n}{2}\}$
• $\left\lceil \frac{n}{2} \right\rceil= \min \{ m \in \mathbb{Z}: m \geq \frac{n}{2}\}$

If $n=2k,k \in \mathbb{Z}$,then: $\frac{n}{2} \mathbb{Z}$,so $$\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor=\max \left\{ \frac{n}{2}, \frac{n-2}{2}, \dots \right\}=\frac{n}{2} \\ \left\lceil \frac{n}{2} \right\rceil=\min \left\{ \frac{n}{2}, \frac{n+2}{2}, \dots \right\}=\frac{n}{2}$$

Therefore, $ \left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor + \left\lceil \frac{n}{2} \right\rceil=n$.

If $n=2k+1, k \in \mathbb{Z}$,then $\frac{n}{2} \notin \mathbb{Z}$.So:

$$\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor=\max \left\{ \frac{n-1}{2}, \frac{n-3}{2}, \dots \right\}=\frac{n-1}{2}\\ \left\lceil \frac{n}{2} \right\rceil=\min \left\{ \frac{n+1}{2}, \frac{n+3}{2}, \dots \right\}=\frac{n+1}{2}$$

Therefore, $ \lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor + \lceil \frac{n}{2} \rceil=\frac{n-1}{2}+\frac{n+1}{2}=n$

Is there also an other way to show the equality or is it the only one?

Answer 1

Since the function $f(x)=\{x\}=x-\lfloor x\rfloor$ is periodic with period one, the function: $$ g(n) = \left\lfloor\frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor+\left\lceil\frac{n}{2}\right\rceil -n$$ is periodic with period $2$. Since $g(0)=g(1)=0$, $g(n)=0$ for every $n\in\mathbb{N}$.

Answer 2

For even $n$, $\lfloor\frac n2\rfloor=\lceil\frac n2\rceil=\frac n2$.

For odd $n$, $\lfloor\frac n2\rfloor=\frac{n-1}2$, and $\lceil\frac n2\rceil=\frac{n+1}2$.

Answer 3

Well, here's another one. In fact, it is possible to prove that for any integer $n$ and any real number $\alpha$, we have $$n=\lfloor (1-\alpha) n\rfloor +\lceil \alpha n\rceil.$$

First, we have $$\alpha n\leq\lceil\alpha n\rceil,$$ therefore, $$n-\lceil\alpha n\rceil\leq (1-\alpha)n,$$ but then, since $n-\lceil\alpha n\rceil$ is an integer, this means $$n-\lceil\alpha n\rceil\leq \lfloor (1-\alpha)n\rfloor.$$

Similarly, we have $$\lfloor (1-\alpha)n\rfloor\leq (1-\alpha)n,$$ therefore, $$\alpha n\leq n-\lfloor (1-\alpha)n\rfloor,$$ but then again, $$\lceil\alpha n\rceil\leq n-\lfloor (1-\alpha)n\rfloor,$$ from the above, we get $$\lfloor (1-\alpha) n\rfloor +\lceil \alpha n\rceil\leq n\leq \lfloor (1-\alpha) n\rfloor +\lceil \alpha n\rceil.$$