I will ignore the sum because of the linearity of differentiation [1]. And I will ignore the bias because I think the derivation for $w$, which I will show, is sufficiently similar. For what it's worth, I think the key is to really understand the chain rule [2]. You might also find these rules helpful. Let's first compute the derivatives of each of the functions separately:
$$
l(a) = \ln(a) = z
$$
$$
l^{\prime}(a) = \frac{\partial z}{\partial a} = \frac{1}{\ln(e)(a)} = \frac{1}{a}
$$
$$
f(b) = 1 + e^b = v
$$
$$
f^{\prime}(b) = \frac{\partial v}{\partial b} = e^b
$$
$$
g(c) = -yc = u
$$
$$
g^{\prime}(c) = \frac{\partial u}{\partial c} = -y
$$
$$
h(w) = wx = t
$$
$$
h^{\prime}(w) = \frac{\partial t}{\partial w} = x
$$
Composing these functions:
$$
l(f(g(h(w)))) = \ln(1 + e^{-y(wx)})
$$
$$
l^{\prime}(f(g(h(w))))
= \frac{\partial z}{\partial v} \frac{\partial v}{\partial u} \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} \frac{\partial t}{\partial w}
=
\frac{1}{1+e^{-y(wx)}} \times e^{-y(wx)} \times -y \times x
=
\frac{-yxe^{-y(wx)}}{1+e^{-y(wx)}}
$$