2
$\begingroup$

I'm studying Lie algebras as purely algebraic objects, without much of a background in the differential geometry surrounding Lie groups.

The definition of $\mathfrak{sl}(n)$ has been given to me as the algebra of traceless $n\times n$ matrices with multiplication $$[A,B]=AB - BA$$ With my limited knowledge of differential geometry, I roughly understand that $\mathfrak{sl}(n)$ is defined as the tangent space of the Lie group $SL(n)$ at the identity, but I don't see how this leads to the definition of $\mathfrak{sl}(n)$ as the traceless $n\times n $ matrices.

I was hoping that someone would be able to roughly explain (or point me in the direction of a not-too-differential-geometry-technical article):

1) What is the reason $\mathfrak{sl}(n)$ is taken to be the algebra of traceless $n \times n$ matrices?

2) What is the connection between $\mathfrak{sl}(n)$ and $SL(n)$?

3) What is the motivation for this definition?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You exponentiate elements of $sl(n)$ to get elements in $SL(n)$. There is a nice relationship between traces and determinants which supplies the proof that $sl(n) $ is the set of traceless matrices. This definition is an equivalent form of the usual definition of the Lie algebra given a Lie group, which becomes apparent after you trudge through the hint I gave. $\endgroup$ – Cameron Williams Jul 18 '14 at 13:18
5
$\begingroup$

For a Lie group $G$, there is an exponential map $\operatorname{exp}:g\to G$ (where $g$ is the corresponding Lie algebra) such that $\operatorname{exp}\{tA\}$ is just the one-parameter subgroup of $G$ with tangent vector $A$ at $e$. For matrix groups, this is just the usual matrix exponential $e^{At}$. Now note that $\operatorname{det}e^A=e^{\operatorname{tr}A}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is there an easy way to see why $\det e^A = e^{\operatorname{tr}A}$ holds? $\endgroup$ – Mathmo123 Jul 18 '14 at 13:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes. First prove it for a diagonal matrix (for intuition), then for a Jordan form matrix, then for any matrix (use the Taylor expansion of the exponent function). $\endgroup$ – LinAlgMan Jul 18 '14 at 13:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @LinAlgMan Alternatively: $\frac{d}{dt}e^{At}=Ae^{At}$. Hence $\frac{d}{dt}\operatorname{det}(e^{At})=\operatorname{tr}A\operatorname{det}(e^{At})$ by Liouville's theorem. $\endgroup$ – Vladimir Jul 18 '14 at 13:38
5
$\begingroup$

There is a purely geometrical explanation. First, let $n=2$, and consider $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})$.

Let $X : [0,1) \to \mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})$ be a smooth path, with $X(0) =E$, where $E$ is the identity.

$$X(t) = \left[\begin{array}{cc} a(t) & b(t) \\ c(t) & d(t) \end{array}\right]$$ where $\det[X(t)] = (ad-bc)(t) = 1$ for all $t$. The derivative $X'(t)$, as $t$ tends to zero, gives a tangent vector to $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})$ at $E$. We have $$X'(t) = \left[\begin{array}{cc} a'(t) & b'(t) \\ c'(t) & d'(t) \end{array}\right]$$

Since $ad-bc \equiv 1$ we can differentiate to give $$a'd+ad'-b'c-bc'\equiv 0$$ Since $X(0)=E$ we know that $a(0)=1$, $b(0)=0$, $c(0)=0$ and $d(0)=1$. Hence: $$\begin{eqnarray*} a'd+ad'-b'c-bc' &\equiv& 0 \\ \\ a'(0)\,d(0)+a(0)\,d'(0)-b'(0)\,c(0)-b(0)\,c'(0) &=& 0 \\ \\ a'(0)+d'(0) &=& 0 \end{eqnarray*}$$ This tells us that $X'(0)$ must be a traceless matrix.

General Dimension

Jacobi's Formula tells us that

$$\det(X)' = \mathrm{tr}\! \left[ \mathrm{adj}(X)X' \right] $$

Since $\det(X) \equiv 1$ we have $\det(X)'\equiv 0$. When $t=0$, $X=E$ and so $\mathrm{adj}(X) = E$. Hence $$\mathrm{tr}\!\left[X'(0)\right]=0$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.