The field of rational numbers is not such a number field. That is, there does not exist a smooth projective morphism $X\to\text{Spec } \mathbf{Z}$ such that the generic fibre is a curve of genus $\geq 1$.

Which number fields allow (or do not allow) the existence of such curves?

For any number field $K/\mathbf{Q}$ of degree $>1$, does there exist a smooth projective geometrically connected curve $X$ over $K$ with good reduction over $K$?

  • 1
    "For any number $K/\bf Q$ of positive degree" should be "For any number field $K/\bf Q$ of degree $>1$" (number field, not number; and the degree $[K:{\bf Q}]$ is automatically positive). – Noam D. Elkies Oct 1 '13 at 3:21
  • See – Watson Dec 2 at 21:57
  • Possibly relevant: "GENUS TWO CURVES WITH EVERYWHERE TWISTED GOOD REDUCTION" available at According to this Master thesis, « A possibly easier, but to the author’s knowledge still open, problem is the following: fix an integer $g >2$ and find an explicit example of a number field $K$ and a curve of genus g over K with good reduction at all places of $K$ » – Watson Dec 3 at 12:55
  • (The MathOverflow question I quoted above only deals with potential good reduction, while in our case, $K$ is fixed at the beginning ; so it doesn't address your question. However, this MO question seems to be related to the open problem quoted above). – Watson Dec 3 at 13:23
  • Related: – Watson Dec 4 at 16:59

This is an interesting question.

Here is, I think, a partial result for genus $1$. Take everything I write with a grain of salt (edit: make that a whole pinch. See the discussion in the comments.).

Let $X$ be the projective curve over $\mathbf Q$ given by the homogeneous equation of degree 12 $$-16(4a^3+27b^2) = d^{12}$$ in the three variables $(a,b,d)$, where $a$ has graded degree $4$, $b$ has graded degree $6$, and $d$ has graded degree $1$.

Proposition: Let $P=(a_P, b_P, d_P)$ be a $\overline{\mathbf Q}$-point of $X$, with field of definition $K_P = \mathbf Q(a_P, b_P, d_P)$. If $d_P \neq 0$, then the elliptic curve

$$E_P \: : \: y^2 = x^3 +a_Px + b_P$$

defined over $K_P$ has good reduction everywhere.

Indeed, the condition for $E_P/K_P$ to have good reduction at some prime $\mathfrak p$ of $\mathcal O_K$ is that the minimal model of $E_{P, \mathfrak p} : =E_P\times_{K}K_{\mathfrak p}$ over $K_\mathfrak p$ have unit discriminant; this is so if and only if $\mathcal v(\Delta_{E_P}) \equiv 0 \mod 12$, i.e. $\Delta_{E_P}$ is a twelvth-power in $K^\times$ (by Tate's algorithm) (Edit: the "only if" part isn't right. See the comments.). This is precisely what the equation defining $X_\Delta$ expresses.

What this shows in fact is that $X_\Delta$ is a $12$-sheeted (ramified, singular) cover of the projective $j$-line $\mathbf P^1_j$, which pulls apart into twelve the fibres of the fake universal elliptic curve over $\mathbf P^1_j$.

A setback of the Proposition is that its converse is false, i.e. not all elliptic curves over $K$ with everywhere good reduction correspond to a $K$-point of $X$. Indeed, what if the discriminant $\Delta(E) \in K^\times$ satisfies $\nu(\Delta(E)) \equiv 0 \mod 12$ for each place $\nu$ of $K$, but is not a global $12$-th power in $K$? This obstruction is measured by the finite Galois-cohomological object $$K(S,m) := \{ x \in K^\times/(K^\times)^m : \nu(x) \equiv 0 \mod 12 \: \forall \: \nu\}$$ which we could call the $\mathbf Z/m\mathbf Z$-module of 'Weil periods'. To get the right correspondence, I believe we should extend the scalars of $X_\Delta$ from $\mathbf Q$ to the 12-th cyclotomic field $\mathbf Q(\zeta_{12})$.

Remark: I'm not quite sure what the genus of (the normalization of) $X_\Delta$ is, but it is certainly greater than $1$. Together with Falting's theorem, this seems to imply:

Claim: Let $K$ be a number field. Then, up to $K$-isomorphism, there are finitely many elliptic curves over $K$ with good reduction everywhere.

  • Careful: the condition that $\Delta$ be a 12th power is necessary but not sufficient for $E$ to have good reduction. For example, the elliptic curve $y^2 = x^3 - 4x$ has discriminant $2^{12}$. – Noam D. Elkies Oct 1 '13 at 3:03
  • @NoamD.Elkies Hmmm, you are right! I guess funny things happen at $2$ and $3$. Can it be salvaged? By the way, it is an honor for me! Regards, – Bruno Joyal Oct 1 '13 at 3:11
  • The finiteness result is true but I don't think the geometrical picture is right. At any rate, this isn't just a small-primes phenomenon: for any prime $p$ there are curves with bad reduction at $p$ whose discriminant has $p$-valuation $12m$ (e.g. with a I$_{12m}$ fiber). – Noam D. Elkies Oct 1 '13 at 3:18
  • @NoamD.Elkies I see! I think that I misunderstood the criterion. Oh well, I will leave it up so others can learn from my mistake. At any rate, thank you for reading it! – Bruno Joyal Oct 1 '13 at 3:30

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.