Sir,I have two questions related to this recurrence relation. It has been messing with me for long. Because of this I couldn't proceed my work for some time .This contains a polynomial term n+2 in sequence. I tried almost all known methods to me. I tried generating functions,general methods all etc . So it makes difficult for solving it. Would you provide the solution for it

$ R_{n}=\frac{1}{n} \{C_1 R_{n-1} +C_2 R_{n-2}\}, R_0 = A_0 ,R_1 = A_1 $

Here $C_1$ and $C_2 $ are constants

Question 1 ::a) What is the solution of this in terms of n for $R_n $ b) What is the summation($ \sum_{n=0}^{n= \infty} R_n$) of it, in-terms of n if possible provided $R_0,R_1,C_1,C_2, R_n $ are numerical constants of singular matrices. Means normal case,numerical constants

Question 2 ::a) What is the solution of this in terms of n for $R_n$ and What is the summation($ \sum_{n=0}^{n= \infty} R_n$) of it, in-terms of n if possible provided $ R_0,R_1,C_1,C_2 $ are matrices of order $3\times 3 $?

  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean $R_{n+2} = \cdots$ or $R_n = \cdots$? $\endgroup$ – johannesvalks Jul 14 '14 at 14:47
  • $\begingroup$ Sir , it can be made like that by substituting n = n-2 . Then it becomes $R_n = $ $\endgroup$ – Nirvana Jul 14 '14 at 14:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What you wrote means that $R_2$ and $R_3$ are undefined... Because given $R_0$ and $R_1$ the next you calculate is $R_4$. $\endgroup$ – johannesvalks Jul 14 '14 at 14:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To be more specific, should you not write $$ R_{n}=\frac{1}{n} \{C_1 R_{n-1} +C_2 R_{n-2}\}, R_0 = A_0 ,R_1 = A_1 $$ $\endgroup$ – johannesvalks Jul 14 '14 at 14:54
  • $\begingroup$ Yes.Sir .I agree there is a typing error I will change that now . It is changed .. $\endgroup$ – Nirvana Jul 14 '14 at 14:58

For now I'll treat only the case in which the terms of the recurrence are scalars. My strategy will be to introduce the generating function $R(x) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty$, simply it as best as possible, and then examine $R(1)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty$. Rewriting your recurrence relation slightly, we want to solve $$(n+2) R_{n+2} = C_1 R_{n+1}+C_2 R_{n}.$$ If we sum over $x^n$ on both sides we obtain the sums \begin{align} \sum_{n=0}\,(n+2) R_{n+2} x^n &= \sum_{n=2}^\infty\, n R_n x^{n-2} \\ &= \frac{1}{x^2}\left[\left(\sum_{n=0}^\infty\,n R_n x^n\right)-R_1 x\right]\\ &=\frac{1}{x^2}\left[x \frac{d}{dx}\left(\sum_{n=0}^\infty R_n x^n\right)-R_1 x\right] \\ &= \frac{1}{x}\left[R'(x) - R_1 \right], \end{align} $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty R_{n+1} x^n =\frac{1}{x} \sum_{n=0}^\infty R_{n+1}x^{n+1} =\frac{1}{x}\left[R(x)-R_0\right].$$ Therefore $$\frac{1}{x}\left(R'(x) - R_1 \right) = \frac{C_1}{x}\left[R(x)-R_0\right]+C_2 R(x),$$ which gives the inhomogeneous ODE $$R'(x)-(C_1 +C_2 x) R(x) = R_1-C_1 R_0.$$ By introducing an appropriate integrating factor we can rewrite this as $$\frac{d}{dx}\left(e^{-C_1 x-C_2 x^2/2}\right)=e^{-C_1 x- C_2 x^2/2}\left(R_1-C_1 R_0 \right)$$ and then integrate both sides to obtain the formal solution \begin{align} R(x) &=e^{C_1 x+C_2 x^2/2}\left[R_0+\left(R_1-C_1 R_0\right)\int_0^x dy\, e^{-C_1 y- C_2 y^2/2} \right]\\ &=e^{C_1 x+C_2 x^2/2}\left[R_0+\left(R_1-C_1 R_0\right) e^{C_1^2/2 C_2} \sqrt{\frac{\pi }{2 C_2}} \left(\text{erf}\left(\frac{C_1+C_2 x}{\sqrt{2 C_2}}\right)-\text{erf}\left(\frac{C_1}{\sqrt{2 C_2}}\right)\right)\right] \end{align}

The summation is now easy to extract as \begin{align} R(1) &=e^{C_1+C_2/2}\left[R_0+\left(R_1-C_1 R_0\right) e^{C_1^2/2 C_2} \sqrt{\frac{\pi }{2 C_2}} \left(\text{erf}\left(\frac{C_1+C_2}{\sqrt{2 C_2}}\right)-\text{erf}\left(\frac{C_1}{\sqrt{2 C_2}}\right)\right)\right] \end{align}

This represents the final answer in the scalar case (at least discounting possible algebra errors...)

What about generalizing to $R$ and $C$ being $N\times N$ matrices? I haven't as much expertise in this realm, but I think that everything remains the same up to the ODE (I see no matrix multiplication going on). The formal solution should be the same, except that now the integrating factors are matrix exponentials in $(C_1,C_2)$. So in principle 'all' one needs to do is compute these exponentials... (See Reyal's newer question for discussion of such.)

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Sir.. I am now working on matrix notation. I will post the answer soon for verification $\endgroup$ – Nirvana Jul 15 '14 at 9:56
  • $\begingroup$ Would you explain how did you get $\frac{d}{dx}\left(e^{-C_1 x-C_2 x^2/2}\right)=e^{-C_1 x- C_2 x^2/2}\left(R_1-C_1 R_0 \,x\right)$ from $R'(x)-(C_1 +C_2 x) R(x) = R_1-C_1 R_0\, x.$ . Which method you are using? And also please mention what do you mean by erf? Thanks $\endgroup$ – Nirvana Jul 15 '14 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ @RejoyRejoy: 1) Details on using integrating factors can be found at Wikipedia here. I'm going to put together an answer for your newer problem, so I'll try to make my answer there clarify this point. 2) erf is the error function---it's just a certain kind of definite integral. See the Wikipedia page here for details. $\endgroup$ – Semiclassical Jul 15 '14 at 14:00
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm... the RHS of the inhomogeneous ODE should be $R_1 - C_1 R_0$. $\endgroup$ – achille hui Jul 15 '14 at 15:44
  • $\begingroup$ @achillehui: Why? I may have made other errors in there, but I don't see $C_0$ as having been defined in this problem. $\endgroup$ – Semiclassical Jul 15 '14 at 15:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.