The following is an exercise appearing page 148 in Knapp's book, representation theory of semisimple groups.

Let $G$ be a connected linear non-compact Lie group with simple Lie algebra $\mathfrak g$. Let $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{k}\oplus \mathfrak{p}$ be the Cartan decomposition of $\mathfrak{g}$. We have $[\mathfrak{p},\mathfrak{p}]=\mathfrak{k}$ since $\mathfrak{g}$ is simple.

Prove that any finite dimensional uniatry representation of $G$ is trivial.

How to prove it ?


$\def\su{\mathfrak{su}} \def\g{\mathfrak{g}}$

Suppose there exists a non-trivial $n$-dimensional unitary representation of $G$ i.e. a homomorphism of Lie groups from $G$ to $SU(n)$. Then, since $\su(n)$ is a simple Lie algebra, the induced map from $\g \rightarrow \su(n) $ is an isomorphism. Hence, the map from $G$ to $SU(n)$ has discrete kernel and is surjective (as $SU(n)$ is connected).This implies that $G$ is a covering group of $SU(n)$.

However, note that $SU(n)$ is a compact group, and the fundamental group of compact groups is finite. Hence, $G$ is a fiber product of compact $SU(n)$ and a finite (and hence compact) group. Hence, $G$ is compact, by a variation of Tychonoff's theorem of products of compact spaces. This is a contradiction. Hence, $G$ does not have a nontrivial finite dimensional unitary representation.

EDIT: I made a pretty big mistake in the above paragraph. The map from $\g \rightarrow \su(n)$ is only injective, not surjective. Hence, we only get a covering map from $G$ onto a connected subgroup of $SU(n)$. This shows that the existence of a unitary representation of a connected, noncompact, "simple" Lie group $G$ is equivalent to the existence of a noncompact, connected, "simple" subgroup of $SU(n)$ for some $n.$ I can't think of an explanation for why such a subgroup does not exist.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Why is the map $\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathfrak{su}(n)$ surjective? $\endgroup$ – Jason DeVito Jul 13 '14 at 18:26
  • $\begingroup$ It's not necessarily. I was being dumb. I'll fix it in a bit. $\endgroup$ – Siddharth Venkatesh Jul 14 '14 at 7:39
  • $\begingroup$ If the center of $G$ is finite, then your same argument should yield a finite covering map $G\rightarrow SU(n)$ with image a subgroup $H$ of $SU(n)$. Finite covering maps are closed, and so $H$ should be closed, hence compact. We then have an isomorphism $G/\operatorname{Ker}(\rho )\rightarrow H$, $\rho :G\rightarrow SU(n)$ the representation. As the quotient of a noncompact group $G$ by a finite group $\operatorname{Ker}(\rho )$ cannot be compact, this is a contradiction. $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Gleason Sep 21 '15 at 17:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.