From Differential Equations (Blanchard, Devaney, and Hall, page 35).

My question is about the model. I let $x$ be the amount of salt and $t$ the minutes passed. Then


Some algebra gives me


and I integrate


to obtain $-10\ln|5-2x|=t+C$. After some algebra, and keeping in mind that $x(0)=0$, I get


I have two sets of solutions: $x=\frac52\left(1-e^{-\frac{t}{10}}\right)$ and $x=\frac52\left(1+e^{-\frac{t}{10}}\right)$.

At this point I'm confused about what to do. Either model provides "sensible" answers, in that the amount of salt I have is positive, as we might expect. So which one do I use?

Solution: (With help from the Ian's answer.) We have an implicit solution $|5-2x|=Ce^{-\frac{t}{10}}$ which implies that $5-2x=Ae^{-\frac{t}{10}}$ where $A=\pm C$. Then we use our initial condition to find that $A$ is restricted to $5$, so we have $5-2x=5e^{-\frac{t}{10}}$, so that our explicit equation for salt is $x=\frac52\left(1-e^{-\frac{t}{10}}\right)$.

To answer questions (a), (b), through (d) requires a calculator and plugging in. To answer (e) we take the limit $\lim_{t\to\infty}x(t)=\frac52$.


So before anything else, your second solution has $x(0)=5$, so that can't be right.

As for what really happened, you got the general implicit solution:

$$-10 \ln |5-2x| = t + C$$

Since $x(0)=0$, the left side starts out at $-10 \ln(5)$, with the positive logarithm. It will not cross over into the other one; if that ever happened, from continuity your division by $5-2x$ would become a division by $0$ which would be invalid. So you'll have the positive logarithm the entire time. Accordingly:

$$-10 \ln(5-2x) = t + C \\ -10 \ln(5) = C \\ -10 \ln(5-2x) = t - 10 \ln(5) \\ 10 \ln(5-2x) = 10 \ln(5) - t \\ 10 \ln((5-2x)/5) = -t \\ (5-2x)/5 = e^{-t/10}$$


The cleanest explanation, which also avoids the issue of treating differentials as separate variables, is to write

$$\frac{20}{5-2y} \frac{dy}{ds} = 1$$

and then integrate both sides with respect to $s$:

$$\int_0^t \frac{20}{5-2y} \frac{dy}{ds} ds = \int_0^t ds$$

then change variables on the left side:

$$\int_{x(0)}^{x(t)} \frac{20}{5-2y} dy = \int_0^t ds$$

Then change variables again, and twiddle some minus signs:

$$\int_{5-2x(t)}^{5-2x(0)} \frac{10}{u} du = \int_0^t ds$$

Now the integral on the left side is over a positive range of $u$, since $5-2x(0)=5>0$, so we wind up with a positive logarithm on the left side.

  • $\begingroup$ The last part you edited in was how I learned separation of variables. Since $\frac{dy}{dx}$ isn't actually a fraction, the notion of multiplying by $dx$ is hard to justify until you integrate and change the variables. $\endgroup$ – user161694 Jul 9 '14 at 2:09

Keeping in mind that $x(0) = 0$ you might wish to rethink the statement that $\frac{5}{2}\left( 1+ e^{-t/10} \right)$ hwich has $x(0) = 5$ is "sensible."

As an aside, you also may wish to recheck your units: A pound of salt is not equivalent to a gallon of water.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The units are fine. Half a gallon of water leaves the tank. This is a tenth of the volume of the tank, and the tank is well-mixed, so a tenth of the amount of salt in the tank leaves with the water. $\endgroup$ – Ian Jul 8 '14 at 19:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.