Followed by the well-know theorem:

(A,B) is controllable iff poles of A-BK can be arbitrarily assigned. (A,B) is stabilizable iff poles of A-BK can be arbitrarily assigned on the LHP
LHP = left-half plane.

My question is we all want the poles of A-BK on the LHP; by doing so the system is stable.

Based on that, it seems redundant for the requirement that (A,B) is controllable, since (A,B) is stabilizable is enough.

I am confused about the hope for controllable of (A,B)


It is obvious that if a system is controllable it is also stabilizable since all eigenvalues can be assigned to LHP. But the stabilizability condition you gave is not accurate since there may exist some eigenvalues that are already in LHP but cannot be arbitrarily assigned. The condition should be that all eigenvalues of $A-BK$ can be assigned to LHP, but not necessarily arbitrarily.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.