7
$\begingroup$

I am trying to prove that $\|A\|=\sup_{||x||=1}|\langle x,Ax\rangle|$ for some selfadjoint bounded operator A on a Hilbertspace.

Can anyone give me a hint how to prove it.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We need some more information to be able to help you here. What definition are you given for $\|A\|$ for an arbitrary operator $\|A\|$? What ideas have you had so far, and where do you think you got stuck? $\endgroup$ – Ben Grossmann Jul 7 '14 at 18:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well $\|A\|:=\sup_{\|x\|=1}\|A x \|$. I tried: $\|A\|^2=\sup \langle Ax,Ax\rangle =\sup \langle x,A^2 x\rangle = \|A^2\|$. So I can conclude that $\|A^2\|=\sup \langle x,A^2 x\rangle$. So by setting $\sqrt{|A|}:=\sqrt{\sqrt{A^2}}$, I have $ \| |A| \|=\sup \langle x, |A| x\ \rangle$. $\endgroup$ – Peter Jul 7 '14 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ You're assuming what you're trying to prove there. I'll update my answer to expand a bit. $\endgroup$ – Ben Grossmann Jul 7 '14 at 19:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Now I think I don't assume that as $\|A\|^2 = \|A^2\|$ for self-adjoint operators. $\endgroup$ – Peter Jul 7 '14 at 19:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Omnomnomnom: You definitely can use the spectral theorem, because you can reduce to a multiplication operator with a real function and the theorem holds for such an operator. More importantly, the same property can be shown to hold for any normal operator, as shown in Theorem 12.25 in the book Functional Analysis by Rudin. $\endgroup$ – Jonas Dahlbæk Jul 7 '14 at 19:30
15
$\begingroup$

It is clear that $|\langle Tx,x\rangle|\leq \|T\|$ for $\|x\|=1$. For the converse, it suffices to show that $|\langle Tx,y\rangle|\leq \alpha$ for all $\|x\|=\|y\|=1$, with $\alpha=\sup\bigl\{|\langle Tx,x\rangle|: \|x\|=1\bigr\}$. We can clearly assume $\langle Tx,y\rangle \in\mathbb R$. Then $$ \langle Tx,y\rangle = (\langle T(x+y),x+y\rangle - \langle T(x-y),x-y\rangle)/4. $$ But then $$ |\langle Tx,y\rangle|\leq\alpha(\|x+y\|^2+\|x-y\|^2)/4=\alpha, $$ by the parallelogram identity.

I have paraphrased this nice derivation from the book Essential Results of Functional Analysis, by Zimmer.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why does It suffice to work with $|\langle Tx,y\rangle|$? I have been thinking about it and WOL you can suppose that $||T|| = 1$ (dividing by $||T||$ at both sides), but $||T||^2=\sup\bigl\{||Tx||^2 : \|x\|=1\bigr\}=\sup\bigl\{<Tx,Tx> : \|x\|=1\bigr\}$. If I call $y=Tx$ I get something similar to your expression but I don't think this is the correct way... $\endgroup$ – Guillermo Mosse Jul 1 '17 at 15:11
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ For $y=Tx/\lVert Tx \rVert$, we have $\lVert Tx \rVert=\langle Tx,y\rangle.$ $\endgroup$ – Jonas Dahlbæk Jul 1 '17 at 15:17
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @JonasDahlbæk Where do you use the fact that the operator is selfadjoint? $\endgroup$ – Teodorism Nov 17 '19 at 7:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Teodorism To get the first displayed formula, you have to use that $\langle Ty,x\rangle=\langle Tx,y\rangle$, which follows from self-adjointness and the assumption the first value is real. (late answer, but for the benefit of other readers) $\endgroup$ – Wojowu May 10 at 20:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.