1
$\begingroup$

I have no idea where to start...this is the statement:

If a polynomial of degree not greater than 5 with rational coefficients has multiple roots, it has also a rational root, except in the case when the degree is 4 and the polynomial is a perfect square.

Any help would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It seems like the statement is false? Take $x^2 + 1.$ It has rational coefficients, degree no greater than $5$, and has multiple roots, but none rational ($\pm i$). It's neither degree $4$ nor a perfect square. $\endgroup$ – John Jul 6 '14 at 20:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But it doesn't have multiple roots, one is $i$ and the other $-i$ $\endgroup$ – CIJ Jul 6 '14 at 20:51
  • $\begingroup$ Ahh, OK. "Has multiple roots" means "has roots with multiplicity greater than one," not "has more than one root." That's where I was confused. $\endgroup$ – John Jul 6 '14 at 22:20
1
$\begingroup$

Outline: Suppose the polynomial $P(x)$ is irreducible over the rationals. Then there are no multiple roots. For if $\alpha$ is a multiple root of $P(x)$, then $\alpha$ is a root of $P'(x)$, and hence of $\gcd(P(x),P'(x))$. Thus the gcd $D(x)$ divides $P(x)$.

If the degree of $P(x)$ is $\le 3$, reducibility forces a rational root. The only way we could fail to have a rational root is if $P(x)$ is a product of two irreducible quadratics, or the product of an irreducible quadratic and an irreducible cubic.

If $P(x)$ is the product of two irreducible quadratics, each with roots $\alpha$ and $\beta$, then $P(x)$ is almost a perfect square. (The problem has a mistake: $2(x^2+1)^2$ and $-(x^2+1)^2$ are not perfect squares. But $P(x)$ must be a constant times a perfect square.)

Finally, we show that irreducible quadratic and irreducible cubic is impossible. For let $\alpha$ be a root of the irreducible quadratic. Then since $\alpha$ is a root of the cubic, it is a root of their gcd. Thus the quadratic divides the cubic.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Awesome, thanks! $\endgroup$ – CIJ Jul 6 '14 at 21:44
  • $\begingroup$ You are welcome. I have left out a smallish amount of detail. $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas Jul 6 '14 at 21:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.