1
$\begingroup$

Let introduce the "Exactly $\{m_{1},m_{2}\}$-SAT" problem : Given a CNF formula $F$ and $2$ integers $m_{1}$ and $m_{2}$, is it true that $F$ has exactly $m_{1}$ or $m_{2}$ models ?

I guess Exactly $\{m_{1},m_{2}\}$-SAT ($m_{1}\leq m_{2}$) is many-one polynomial time reducible to the parametrized problem "Exactly $m_2$-SAT" with $m_2$ considered as a parameter : Given a CNF formula $F$ is it true that $F$ has exactly $m_{2}$ models.

Is it correct ?

Thank you for your answer.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

No, that's not correct. Finding the solution to an Exactly {$m_1$,$m_2$}-SAT problem can't be done with a single call to an Exactly {$m$}-SAT solver for any $m$, so there is no many-one reduction from the former to the latter. The weaker Turing reduction does apply, since you can solve Exactly {$m_1$,$m_2$}-SAT problem with at most two calls to an Exactly {$m$}-SAT solver.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Tks for your answer. Let me reformulate the question : consider $m_1$ and $m_2$ as parameters, is it possible to solve Exactly $\{m_1,m_2\}$-SAT in polynomial time with a single call to Exactly $m_2$-SAT ? $\endgroup$ – Xavier Labouze Jan 2 '12 at 22:34
  • $\begingroup$ Only if $m_1 = m_2$. Otherwise the call tells you nothing useful about the $m_1$ case. $\endgroup$ – Kyle Jones Jan 2 '12 at 23:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.