4
$\begingroup$

show that $$\dfrac{\sqrt{2}}{2}<f(n)=\dfrac{\sqrt{2n+1}-1}{1+\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{3}}+\cdots+\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{n}}}<\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$$

I know this $$\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{2}{2\sqrt{n}}<\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{n}+\sqrt{n-1}}=2(\sqrt{n}-\sqrt{n-1})$$

By the way I can use Stolz lemma find the $$\lim_{n\to\infty}f(n)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\dfrac{\sqrt{2n+1}-\sqrt{2n-1}}{\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{n}}}=\dfrac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$$

but this can't prove this inequality,Thank you

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm getting a feeling that our target shall remain to simplify the denominator first! This will help us to go further from this point. $\endgroup$ – Kushashwa Ravi Shrimali Jun 25 '14 at 13:04
  • $\begingroup$ If you rationalize each term in the denominator, you get: $$ 1 + \cfrac{\sqrt{2}}{2} + \cfrac{\sqrt{3}}{3} + \dots + \cfrac{\sqrt{n}}{n} $$ $\endgroup$ – Kushashwa Ravi Shrimali Jun 25 '14 at 13:05
5
$\begingroup$

The estimate $1/\sqrt{n} < 2(\sqrt{n}-\sqrt{n-1})$ yields

$$\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} < 1 + \sum_{k=2}^n 2(\sqrt{k}-\sqrt{k-1}) = 2\sqrt{n} - 1,$$

and so

$$\frac{\sqrt{2n+1}-1}{\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}}} > \frac{\sqrt{2n+1}-1}{2\sqrt{n}-1} > \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}.$$

For an upper bound, we could look at the analogous $1/\sqrt{n} > 2(\sqrt{n+1}-\sqrt{n})$, which yields

$$\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{k}} > 2(\sqrt{n+1}-1).$$

That would leave

$$\frac{\sqrt{2n+1}-1}{\sqrt{n+1}-1} < \sqrt{3}$$

to be shown, or

$$\sqrt{3}-1 < \sqrt{3(n+1)}-\sqrt{2n+1} = \frac{n+2}{\sqrt{3(n+1)}+\sqrt{2n+1}}.$$

A trivial estimate shows the right hand side is $> \frac{\sqrt{n+2}}{\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{2}}$, which yields the inequality for $n \geqslant 7$.

The cases $1 \leqslant n \leqslant 6$ can be verified by hand.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Does estimating like that is considered to be the best way? Just asking, no offense. $\endgroup$ – Kushashwa Ravi Shrimali Jun 25 '14 at 13:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The "best" way is always the easiest that gives you the bounds you want/need. So what is the best way depends. For me, at this time, estimating like that was the best way. If one knows a slick inequality that one can apply to the expression, that would probably be considered a better way. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Jun 25 '14 at 13:24
  • $\begingroup$ That's a positive response Daniel. I appreciate it. Thank You! And Excellent Work. :) $\endgroup$ – Kushashwa Ravi Shrimali Jun 25 '14 at 13:42
0
$\begingroup$

Let's start from that Stolz lemma. We see that it converges down to $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$, and we feel that expression under limit in the middle of equality it must be monotonically decreasing. Let's check that.

So, let's $$g(n)=\frac{\sqrt{2n+1} - \sqrt{2n-1}}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}}.$$ Continue it on to real line: $$g(x)=\frac{\sqrt{2x+1} - \sqrt{2x-1}}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}}.$$ Now we calculate $$g'(x)=\frac{-\frac{4 x}{\sqrt{2 x-1}}+\frac{4 x}{\sqrt{2 x+1}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 x-1}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 x+1}}}{2 \sqrt{x}}.$$ Our goal now is to prove that this expression is less that zero $\forall\,x>0.$ It's kinda trivial.

So we have now that $g'(x)<0\ \ \forall\,x>0$, therefore $g(x)$ is decreasing, therefore $g(n)$ is decreasing when $n>1$. Then, I cannot right now strictly prove that the same can we say about $\ f(n)$, but I'm pretty sure you can get some inspiraton in the proof of Stolz lemma (beautiful lemma in my opinion). So let's say that $f(n)$ is monotonically decreasing to $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$. Now we only got to prove that $f(1)$ satisfies your inequality, and then every single $f(n)$ will be jailed below $\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$ monotonically converging down to $\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}$. This particular case is trivial too.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.